Cited by 155Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Missing data in clinical trials: from clinical assumptions to statistical analysis using pattern mixture models

Ratitch, Bohdana, O'Kelly, Michael, Tosiello, Robert·2013·Pharmaceutical Statistics

Abstract

The need to use rigorous, transparent, clearly interpretable, and scientifically justified methodology for preventing and dealing with missing data in clinical trials has been a focus of much attention from regulators, practitioners, and academicians over the past years. New guidelines and recommendations emphasize the importance of minimizing the amount of missing data and carefully selecting primary analysis methods on the basis of assumptions regarding the missingness mechanism suitable for the study at hand, as well as the need to stress‐test the results of the primary analysis under different sets of assumptions through a range of sensitivity analyses. Some methods that could be effectively used for dealing with missing data have not yet gained widespread usage, partly because of their underlying complexity and partly because of lack of relatively easy approaches to their implementation. In this paper, we explore several strategies for missing data on the basis of pattern mixture models that embody clear and realistic clinical assumptions. Pattern mixture models provide a statistically reasonable yet transparent framework for translating clinical assumptions into statistical analyses. Implementation details for some specific strategies are provided in an Appendix (available online as Supporting Information), whereas the general principles of the approach discussed in this paper can be used to implement various other analyses with different sets of assumptions regarding missing data. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pst.1549

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ratitch, B., O'Kelly, M., & Tosiello, R.
Affiliations
  • IQVIA (United States) (US)
  • Quintiles Dublin Ireland
  • Sunovion (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Ratitch, Bohdana
Venue
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-04
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
337-347
ISSN
  • 1539-1604 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-1612
OpenAlex
W1977634030
Cited by
155
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmaceutical Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
missing data, clinical trials, pattern-mixture models, missing data mechanisms, sensitivity analysis
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review