The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antidiabetic herbal drugs officially approved in China
Abstract
Over the centuries, Chinese herbal drugs have served as a major source of medicines for the prevention and treatment of diseases including diabetes mellitus (known as ‘Xiao‐ke’). It is estimated that more than 200 species of plants exhibit hypoglycaemic properties, including many common plants, such as pumpkin, wheat, celery, wax guard, lotus root and bitter melon. To date, hundreds of herbs and traditional Chinese medicine formulas have been reported to have been used for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. This paper provides a brief review of the antidiabetic drugs of plant origin that have been approved by the Chinese health regulatory agency for commercial use in China. It was believed, through pharmacological studies, that medicinal herbs were meticulously organized in these antidiabetic drug formulas such that polysaccharide containing herbs restore the functions of pancreatic tissues and cause an increase in insulin output by the functional beta cells, while other ingredients enhance the microcirculation, increase the availability of insulin and facilitate the metabolism in insulin‐dependent processes. Pharmacological and clinical evaluations indicated that these drugs had a mild, but significant, blood glucose lowering effect and that the long‐term use of these agents may be advantageous over chemical drugs in alleviating some of the chronic diseases and complications caused by diabetes. Additionally, the use of these natural agents in conjunction with conventional drug treatments, such as a chemical agent or insulin, permits the use of lower doses of the drug and/or decreased frequency of administration which decreases the side effects most commonly observed. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress: Its Role in Disease and Novel Prospects for Therapy
Schönthal, A. H. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/857516 · Cited by 353
The hypoglycaemic effect of pumpkins as anti-diabetic and functional medicines
Adams, G. G., Imran, S., Wang, S., Mohammad, A., Kok, S., Gray, D. A., Channell, G. A., Morris, G. A., & Harding, S. E. (2011) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2011.03.016 · Cited by 175
Badr, S. E. A., Shaaban, M., Elkholy, Y. M., Helal, M. H., Hamza, A. S., Masoud, M. S., & El Safty, M. M. (2011) · Natural Product Research · doi:10.1080/14786410903312991 · Cited by 75
Agu, K. C., Eluehike, N., Ofeimun, R. O., Abile, D., Ideho, G., Ogedengbe, M. O., Onose, P. O., & Elekofehinti, O. O. (2019) · Clinical Phytoscience · doi:10.1186/s40816-019-0116-0 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, W., Gao, W., & Tang, L.
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1127-1134
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W2164357968
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.