Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Possible anti-diabetic potentials of Annona muricata (soursop): inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities

Open access

Abstract

Annona muricata has been used in folklore in the management of diabetes. A major strategy in decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetes involves the inhibition of carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes - α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Thus, this study evaluated the in vivo and in vitro inhibitory potentials of the different parts (fruit-pulp, leaf, stem-bark and root-bark) of Annona muricata . A total of 120 Wistar rats were treated with methanol extracts for 28 days after which blood and tissue samples were collected for α-amylase assay. In vitro inhibitory properties of methanol, ethyl acetate and dichloromethane extracts of the various parts of the plant on α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities were performed using standard procedures. The mode and mechanism of interactions between the enzymes and extracts (and isolated acetogenin) were determined using various kinetic interpolations and in silico experiments. The fruit-pulp and root-bark methanolic extracts better -inhibited plasma and tissue amylase in vivo. The in vitro studies revealed that the stem-bark methanolic, fruit-pulp ethyl acetate, and leaf dichloromethane extracts, better inhibited α-amylase activity compared with the standard acarbose. Also, the leaf methanol, fruit-pulp ethyl acetate, and root-bark dichloromethane extract better inhibited α-glucosidase activity. These observations were corroborated with their higher Bmax and Vmax and lower Kd values. All the extracts exhibited an “uncompetitive” type of inhibition pattern. Also, the isolated acetogenin (15-acetyl guanacone) from the fruit-pulp showed a better binding affinity compared to the standard drug, Metformin. Better natural remedy for diabetics can be obtained from Annona muricata with minimal or no adverse side effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40816-019-0116-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aguiree F, Brown A, Cho NH et al.,.IDF Diabetes Atlas, 2013.
  2. Mitra A. Some salient points in dietary and lifestyle survey of rural Bengal particularly tribal populace in relation to rural diabetes prevalence. Studies on Ethnomedicine. 2008;2(1):51–6.
  3. Bischoff H, Puls W, Krause HP, Schutt H, Thomas G. Pharmacological properties of the novel glucosidase inhibitors BAY m 1099 (miglitol) and BAY o 1248. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1985;1:53–62.
  4. Valiathan MS. Healing plants. Curr Sci. 1998;75(11):1122–7.
  5. Worthington V., 1993. Αlpha-amylase. In Worthington Enzyme Manual: Worthington Biochemical Corp. Freehold, NJ., pp. 36–41.
  6. Worthington V., 1993. Maltose-α-glucosidase. In Worthington Enzyme Manual: Worthington Biochemical Corp. Freehold, NJ., pp. 261.
  7. McConkey BJ, Sobolev V, Edelman M. The performance of current methods in ligand-protein docking. Curr Sci. 2002;83:845–56.

Cited by

See all 53

Metadata

Authors
Agu, K. C., Eluehike, N., Ofeimun, R. O., Abile, D., Ideho, G., Ogedengbe, M. O., Onose, P. O., & Elekofehinti, O. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Benin (NG)
  • Adekunle Ajasin University (NG)
Corresponding author
Eluehike, Nkeiruka
Venue
Clinical Phytoscience
Published
2019-06-13
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2199-1197 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952831681
Cited by
53
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Phytoscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
Annona muricata, antidiabetic activity, α-amylase inhibition, α-glucosidase inhibition, acetogenins, postprandial hyperglycemia, enzyme kinetics, uncompetitive inhibition, plant extracts, fruit pulp, root bark

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Possible anti-diabetic potentials of Annona muricata (soursop): inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40816-019-0116-0
The paper
Agu, K. C., Eluehike, N., Ofeimun, R. O., Abile, D., Ideho, G., Ogedengbe, M. O., Onose, P. O., & Elekofehinti, O. O. (2019). Possible anti-diabetic potentials of Annona muricata (soursop): inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities. Clinical Phytoscience. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40816-019-0116-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.