Effects of glycowithanolides from Withania somnifera on an animal model of Alzheimer's disease and perturbed central cholinergic markers of cognition in rats
Abstract
Abstract The active principles of Withania somnifera (WS, 20–50 mg/kg, p.o.), consisting of equimolar amounts of sitoindosides. VII–X and withaferin A, were investigated for putative nootropic activity in an experimentally validated Alzheimer's disease (AD) model. The syndrome was induced by ibotenic acid (IA) lesioning of the nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) in rats. Cognitive deficits induced in NMB‐lesioned rats were assessed by attenuation of a learned active avoidance task and a decrease in frontal cortical and hippocampal acetylcholine (ACh) concentrations, choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity and muscarinic cholinergic receptor (MCR) binding. IA‐induced NBM lesioning in rats caused a marked cognitive deficit, as evidenced by severe reduction of the learned task, and was accompanied by a significant decrease in frontal cortex and hippocampal ACh levels, ChAT activity and MCR binding. WS (50 mg/kg) significantly reversed both IA‐induced cognitive deficit and the reduction in cholinergic markers after 2 weeks of treatment. The findings validate the medharasayan (promoter of learning and memory) effect of W. somnifera, as has been reported in Ayurveda.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extract containing sitoindosides VII-X and withaferin A (50 mg/kg, p.o for two weeks) reversed ibotenic acid-induced cognitive deficit and reduction in cholinergic markers (e.g., ACh and ChAT) in rats.
“The extract containing sitoindosides VII–X and withaferin A (50 mg/kg, p.o for two weeks) reversed ibotenic acid-induced cognitive deficit and reduction in cholinergic markers (e.g., ACh and ChAT) in rats [156].”
From Indian Medicinal Herbs and Formulations for Alzheimer’s Disease, from Traditional Knowledge to Scientific Assessment (2020) · cites this paper as [156]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 112
- Authors
- Bhattacharya, S. K., Kumar, A., & Ghosal, S.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Indian Institute of Technology BHU (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Ghosal, Shibnath
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-113
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W2164176196
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Withania somnifera, withaferin A, Alzheimer's disease, ibotenic acid lesions, nucleus basalis magnocellularis, cholinergic system, acetylcholine, choline acetyltransferase, muscarinic receptor binding, cognitive impairment, nootropic activity, hippocampus, frontal cortex, Ayurveda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review