Toxicological evaluation of fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifidain vitro and in vivo
Abstract
The potential toxicity of fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida was investigated in vitro and in vivo. By the Ames test, fucoidan showed no mutagenicity up to 500 microL/plate, and inhibited the mutagenicity induced by 4-nitro-quinoline-1-oxide, by up to 71%, compared with controls. In the bone marrow micronucleus test, fucoidan, at all levels tested, did not change the micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte percentage ratio in mouse bone marrow cells. As an acute in vivo toxicity test, fucoidan from 0 to 2000 mg/kg body weight per day was administered orally to Sprague-Dawley rats for 28 days. No significant toxicological change was induced by fucoidan treatment up to 1000 mg/kg body weight per day in biochemical analyses, hematological analyses, necropsy and liver histopathology. The plasma ALT level was slightly, but significantly, increased in male rats at 2000 mg/kg/day. The consumption of fucoidan from Undaria pinnatifida, up to 1000 mg/kg body weight per day, may be safe in rodents, with no sign of toxicity after up to 28 days of daily administration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fucoidans have attracted attention as practically nontoxic natural products with antitumor, immunomodulatory, and other useful properties.
“This research is necessary for the solution of problems of standardization of preparations on the basis of fucoidans, which have attracted attention as practically nontoxic natural products [25,26,27] with antitumor, immunomodulatory, and other useful properties [24,28,29,30].”
From Anticancer and Cancer Preventive Properties of Marine Polysaccharides: Some Results and Prospects (2013) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Chung, H., Jeun, J., Houng, S., Jun, H., Kweon, D., & Lee, S.
- Affiliations
- Korea University (KR)
- Kolon Life Science (South Korea) (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Sung‐Joon
- Venue
- Phytotherapy Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-24
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1078-1083
- ISSN
- 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1573
- OpenAlex
- W2069542180
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
- Keywords
- fucoidan, Undaria pinnatifida, brown seaweed polysaccharides, toxicity, mutagenicity, Ames test, micronucleus test, acute oral toxicity, hepatotoxicity, ALT elevation, safety assessment
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Animals, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Organ Size, Polysaccharides, Micronucleus Tests, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Toxicity Tests, Undaria, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review