Cited by 33Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntimicrobial agents and applicationsAntimicrobial Peptides and Activities

A Comprehensive Review of Antimicrobial Agents Against Clinically Important Bacterial Pathogens: Prospects for Phytochemicals

Ghosh, Soumyadip, Basu, Soumya, Anbarasu, Anand, Ramaiah, Sudha·2025·Phytotherapy Research

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) hinders the effective treatment of a range of bacterial infections, posing a serious threat to public health globally, as it challenges the currently available antimicrobial drugs. Among the various modes of antimicrobial action, antimicrobial agents that act on membranes have the most promising efficacy. However, there are no consolidated reports on the shortcomings of these drugs, existing challenges, or the potential applications of phytochemicals that act on membranes. Therefore, in this review, we have addressed the challenges and focused on various phytochemicals as antimicrobial agents acting on the membranes of clinically important bacterial pathogens. Antibacterial phytochemicals comprise diverse group of agents found in a wide range of plants. These compounds have been found to disrupt cell membranes, inhibit enzymes, interfere with protein synthesis, generate reactive oxygen species, modulate quorum sensing, and inhibit bacterial adhesion, making them promising candidates for the development of novel antibacterial therapies. Recently, polyphenolic compounds have been reported to have proven efficacy against nosocomial multidrug-resistant pathogens. However, more high-quality studies, improved standards, and the adoption of rules and regulations are required to firmly confirm the clinical efficacy of phytochemicals derived from plants. Identifying potential challenges, thrust areas of research, and considering viable approaches is esse…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ptr.8365

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Ghosh, S., Basu, S., Anbarasu, A., & Ramaiah, S.
Affiliations
  • Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Ramaiah, Sudha
Venue
Phytotherapy Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-11-04
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
138-161
ISSN
  • 0951-418X (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1573
OpenAlex
W4404028303
Cited by
33
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research (2021‐11889)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, phytochemicals, antibacterial agents, bacterial membrane disruption, multidrug-resistant bacteria, nosocomial infections, polyphenols, quorum sensing inhibition, reactive oxygen species, bacterial adhesion, enzyme inhibition, plant-derived antimicrobials
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Humans, Quorum Sensing, Phytochemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review