Cited by 8Meteorological Phenomena and SimulationsOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesAtmospheric aerosols and clouds

Ten years of ENVISAT observations at ECMWF: a review of activities and lessons learnt.

Dragani, R., Abdalla, S., Engelen, R. J., Inness, A., Thépaut, J.‐N.·2015·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

In 2002, the European Space Agency (ESA) launched theENVIromentalSATellite(ENVISAT), which carried ten instruments to provide continuous observation of Earth's land, atmosphere, oceans and ice caps. During the satellite's lifetime, the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) has routinely monitored a variety of products from many of its instruments. A subset of these data has also been assimilated in the ECMWF operational system, along with two of its applications: the reanalysis and the Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) systems. This article reviews those activities and summarizes the lessons learnt in monitoring and assimilating data from a research satellite within a numerical weather prediction system. The value of continuous data monitoring and the benefits that a close collaboration between data provider and data user can bring to both parties are highlighted. For observations that were assimilated, impact assessments on the ECMWF products have been performed periodically. Two cases are presented in this article. The first one shows that the assimilation of ocean wave information can reduce the wave‐height model random error by up to 8% at the analysis time, with benefits at later forecast times extending to up to 5 days in the Tropics. The second example shows that the assimilation of two ENVISAT ozone products improves the agreement of the ozone analyses with independent ozone observations obtained from sondes and the Microwave L…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.2380

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems.

    “However, satellite scatterometer, altimeter, and synthetic aperture radar data are providing valuable assimilation constraints for wind and sea-state forecasts by NWP systems (Isaksen and Janssen, 2004;Dragani et al., 2015).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Dragani et al., 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dragani, R., Abdalla, S., Engelen, R. J., Inness, A., & Thépaut, J. ‐.
Affiliations
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB)
Corresponding author
Dragani, R.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-04
Volume
141
Issue
687
Pages
598-610
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2131928123
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • European Commission
  • Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Keywords
Envisat, satellite data assimilation, numerical weather prediction, reanalysis, MACC, Microwave Limb Sounder, data reprocessing, long-term data preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review