Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 755

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales

Open access
Bechtold, Peter, Köhler, Martin, Jung, Thomas, Doblas‐Reyes, Francisco, Leutbecher, Martin, Rodwell, Mark J., Vitart, Frederic, Balsamo, Gianpaolo·2008·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model are presented that stem from revisions of the convection and diffusion parametrizations. The revisions concern in particular the introduction of a variable convective adjustment time‐scale, a convective entrainment rate proportional to the environmental relative humidity, as well as free tropospheric diffusion coefficients for heat and momentum based on Monin–Obukhov functional dependencies. The forecasting system is evaluated against analyses and observations using high‐resolution medium‐range deterministic and ensemble forecasts, monthly and seasonal integrations, and decadal integrations with coupled atmosphere‐ocean models. The results show a significantly higher and more realistic level of model activity in terms of the amplitude of tropical and extratropical mesoscale, synoptic and planetary perturbations. Importantly, with the higher variability and reduced bias not only the probabilistic scores are improved, but also the midlatitude deterministic scores in the short and medium ranges. Furthermore, for the first time the model is able to represent a realistic spectrum of convectively coupled equatorial Kelvin and Rossby waves, and maintains a realistic amplitude of the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) during monthly forecasts. However, the propagation speed of the MJO is slower than observed. The higher tropical tropospheric wave activity also results in better stratospheric temperatures and winds through the deposition of momentum. The partitioning between convective and resolved precipitation is unaffected by the model changes with roughly 62% of the total global precipitation being of the convective type. Finally, the changes in convection and diffusion parametrizations resulted in a larger spread of the ensemble forecasts, which allowed the amplitude of the initial perturbations in the ensemble prediction system to decrease by 30%. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.289

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 755

Metadata

Authors
Bechtold, P., Köhler, M., Jung, T., Doblas‐Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M., Rodwell, M. J., Vitart, F., & Balsamo, G.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-07
Volume
134
Issue
634
Pages
1337-1351
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2163088949
Cited by
755
References
1
FWCI
17.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.289
The paper
Bechtold, P., Köhler, M., Jung, T., Doblas‐Reyes, F., Leutbecher, M., Rodwell, M. J., Vitart, F., & Balsamo, G. (2008). Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time‐scales. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.289

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.