The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of operational methods of variational and ensemble‐variational data assimilation
Open accessAbstract
Variational and ensemble methods have been developed separately by various research and development groups and each brings its own benefits to data assimilation. In the last decade or so, various ways have been developed to combine these methods, especially with the aims of improving the background‐error covariance matrices and of improving efficiency. The field has become confusing, even to many specialists, and so there is now a need to summarize the methods in order to show how they work, how they are related, what benefits they bring, why they have been developed, how they perform, and what improvements are pending. This article starts with a reminder of basic variational and ensemble techniques and shows how they can be combined to give the emerging ensemble‐variational (EnVar) and hybrid methods. A key part of the article includes details of how localization is commonly represented. There has been a particular push to develop four‐dimensional methods that are free of linearized forecast models. This article attempts to provide derivations of the formulations of most popular schemes. These are otherwise scattered throughout the literature or absent. It builds on the nomenclature used to distinguish between methods, and discusses further possible developments to the methods, including the representation of model error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation
Tarantola, A. (2005) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898717921 · Cited by 6,585
Evensen, G. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc00572 · Cited by 5,371
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504 · cited 2×
“NCEP WRF (Skamarock et al., 2005), WRF-Chem (Schwartz et al.”
A multivariate balance operator for variational ocean data assimilation.
Weaver, A. T., Deltel, C., Machu, E., Ricci, S., & Daget, N. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.05.119 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Data assimilation in the geosciences: An overview of methods, issues, and perspectives
Carrassi, A., Bocquet, M., Bertino, L., & Evensen, G. (2018) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.535 · Cited by 867
The future of forecasting for renewable energy
Sweeney, C., Bessa, R. J., Browell, J., & Pinson, P. (2020) · WIREs Energy and Environment · doi:10.1002/wene.365 · Cited by 292
Outlook for Exploiting Artificial Intelligence in the Earth and Environmental Sciences
Boukabara, S.-A., Krasnopolsky, V., Penny, S. G., Stewart, J. Q., McGovern, A., Hall, D., Ten Hoeve, J. E., Hickey, J., Allen Huang, H.-L., Williams, J. K., et al. (2021) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-20-0031.1 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Bannister, R. N.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 703
- Pages
- 607-633
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2563710438
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of operational methods of variational and ensemble‐variational data assimilation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.2982
- The paper
- Bannister, R. N. (2017). A review of operational methods of variational and ensemble‐variational data assimilation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2982
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.