Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme

Rawlins, F., Ballard, S. P., Bovis, K. J., Clayton, A. M., Li, D., Inverarity, G. W., Lorenc, A. C., Payne, T. J.·2007·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

The Met Office has developed a 4D‐Var data assimilation system, which was implemented in the global forecast system on 5 October 2004. This followed a development path based on the previous 3D‐Var configuration, with many aspects kept in common. A 4D‐Var capability was provided by the introduction of a linear perturbation forecast model based on the Unified Model, the non‐hydrostatic grid‐point model producing our operational forecasts. There were clear advantages in verification of forecasts compared to the equivalent 3D‐Var configuration, with an improvement of 2.6% in a composite skill score verified against observations during pre‐operational trials. The largest differences in model evolution occur in storm‐track regions in the extratropics. Overall, improvements in verification scores as measured against observations were larger than those measured against analyses, particularly at upper levels. There is an improvement in verification of surface parameters (10 m wind, 1.5 m temperature and relative humidity) against analyses. The strongest impact on fitting observations is seen for satellite radiances with weighting functions peaking in the stratosphere and upper troposphere. The largest changes to assimilation increments occurred in the top model levels, particularly wind increments which became much larger near the model top. Similarities were found in the signal of 4D‐Var versus 3D‐Var for models at two different resolutions, from which we infer that low‐resolution trials remain valid for exploring some aspects of 4D‐Var before confirmation in full‐scale tests. © Crown Copyright 2007. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.32

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Rawlins, F., Ballard, S. P., Bovis, K. J., Clayton, A. M., Li, D., Inverarity, G. W., Lorenc, A. C., & Payne, T. J.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
133
Issue
623
Pages
347-362
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2066352855
Cited by
462
References
15
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.32
The paper
Rawlins, F., Ballard, S. P., Bovis, K. J., Clayton, A. M., Li, D., Inverarity, G. W., Lorenc, A. C., & Payne, T. J. (2007). The Met Office global four‐dimensional variational data assimilation scheme. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.32

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.