The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Models of cloud‐topped mixed layers under a strong inversion
Abstract
Theoretical models are constructed with the aim of relating, explaining and predicting features of a radiatively active turbulent cloud layer over the sea and under a strong subsidence inversion. Both dry aerosol clouds (no phase change) and wet clouds (with a phase change and latent heat exchanges) are considered. For the wet cloud case an important element of the theory is the requirement that the wet‐bulb potential temperature must increase upwards in the inversion. For both cases entrainment of the upper warm air is hypothesized to lie between upper and lower limits determined from the turbulent energy budget. The dry cloud case is solved for both steady state and transient results, with only the transient behaviour depending on the entrainment hypothesis. Only steady state solutions are presented for the more complex wet cloud case and these differ somewhat for the maximum and minimum entrainment limits. Observational data from Oakland, California are used for comparison with those steady state solutions, with results indicating the essential validity of the approach. Detailed comparisons, especially for determination of the most correct entrainment rate, are hampered both by inadequate measurement of the inversion properties and by uncertainties in the net radiation flux leaving the cloud top. Computations of the latter suggest that several presently used radiation models are still in serious disagreement, at least for application to downward flux under an inversion. It is suggested that the present theory provides a partial explanation of the origin of the trade wind inversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness
Albrecht, B. A. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227 · Cited by 4,422
Mesoscale shallow convection in the atmosphere
Atkinson, B. W., & Wu Zhang, J. (1996) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/96rg02623 · Cited by 401
Stevens, B. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122658 · Cited by 339
Bauer, S., Hitchcock, G. L., & Olson, D. B. (1991) · Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers · doi:10.1016/0198-0149(91)90062-k · Cited by 263
Eastern Pacific Emitted Aerosol Cloud Experiment
Russell, L. M., Sorooshian, A., Seinfeld, J. H., Albrecht, B. A., Nenes, A., Ahlm, L., Chen, Y.-C., Coggon, M., Craven, J. S., Flagan, R. C., et al. (2013) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00015.1 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Lilly, D. K.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1968-07
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 401
- Pages
- 292-309
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2147763048
- Cited by
- 910
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Models of cloud‐topped mixed layers under a strong inversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49709440106
- The paper
- Lilly, D. K. (1968). Models of cloud‐topped mixed layers under a strong inversion. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709440106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.