The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A practical Lagrangian method for relating scalar concentrations to source distributions in vegetation canopies
Abstract
The transfer of scalar atmospheric constituents within vegetation canopies cannot be predicted from simple gradient‐diffusion theory. To replace gradient‐diffusion theory in this context, an analytic Lagrangian theory is developed which predicts the concentration field of a scalar atmospheric constituent emanating from a spatially extensive source in an inhomogeneous turbulent flow. In this ‘localized near‐field’ theory, the mean scalar concentration C is expressed as the sum of a diffusive far‐field contribution Cf which obeys gradient‐diffusion theory, and a non‐diffusive near‐field contribution Cn which is calculated for each source element by assuming the turbulence to be locally homogeneous. It follows that Cf provides the large‐scale background variation and Cn the detailed local structure of the C profile. The theory applies to both non‐advective and advective situations. Comparison with random‐flight predictions of C shows that the assumptions of the theory (which are exact in homogeneous turbulence) are adequate for inhomogeneous turbulence typical of real canopies. The random‐flight predictions also show that vertical velocity skewness (not accounted for in the localized near‐field theory but typically of order −0.5 to −1 in canopies) has only a small effect on C.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coherent eddies and turbulence in vegetation canopies: The mixing-layer analogy
Raupach, M. R., Finnigan, J. J., & Brunei, Y. (1996) · Boundary-Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/bf00120941 · Cited by 984
Self-citationLeaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies
LEUNING, R., KELLIHER, F. M., DE PURY, D. G. G., & SCHULZE, E. ‐. (1995) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00628.x · Cited by 688
Deducing Ground-to-Air Emissions from Observed Trace Gas Concentrations: A Field Trial
Flesch, T. K., Wilson, J. D., Harper, L. A., Crenna, B. P., & Sharpe, R. R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0487:dgefot>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 355
Schmitt, M., Rudolph, M., Jacobson, S., & Plotnik, J. (2023) · doi:10.32942/x26w26 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Raupach, M. R.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-04
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 487
- Pages
- 609-632
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W1971235239
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A practical Lagrangian method for relating scalar concentrations to source distributions in vegetation canopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49711548710
- The paper
- Raupach, M. R. (1989). A practical Lagrangian method for relating scalar concentrations to source distributions in vegetation canopies. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711548710
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.