PreprintCited by 2Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Evidence for ancestral olfactory sensitivity but not discrimination across two living elephant species

Open access
Schmitt, Melissa, Rudolph, Matthew, Jacobson, Sarah, Plotnik, Joshua·2023

Abstract

While African savanna and Asian elephants split between 4.2-9 MYA, they are often regarded as one united group, ‘elephants,’ even in the scientific literature. This is concerning, as while both are keystone species in their respective habitats, each face different environmental pressures and have rarely been compared experimentally. Savanna elephants must locate resources that vary spatially and temporally across patchy savannas, while Asian elephants do so within dense forests containing high biodiversity. Both species use olfaction to guide decision-making, however, considering their ecologies, we hypothesize that their olfactory abilities differ. Thus, we investigated the sensitivity and detection limits of both savanna and Asian elephants’ olfactory systems, as well as changes in these limits in a complex odour environment using two odour-based choice experiments. While both species correctly detected a target odour – savanna elephants detected it at 50 parts per million (ppm) and Asian elephants at 100 ppm – only the savanna elephants’ limit changed (to 1,000 ppm) in the complex odour environment. Our findings suggest that these species have similar olfactory sensitivity, which probably evolved in a shared ancestor, but divergent olfactory discrimination abilities, which are likely a result of variation in both the density and species diversity of their habitats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32942/x26w26

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Scholes, R, Bond, W & Eckhardt, H. 2003 Vegetation dynamics in the Kruger ecosystem. In The Kruger experience: Ecology and management of Savanna heterogeneity (eds. J. Du Toit, K. Rogers & H. Biggs), pp. 242-262. Washington DC, USA, Island Press.
  2. Helle, T. 1984 Foraging behaviour of the semi-domestic reindeer (Rangifer tarandus L.) in relation to snow in Finnish Lapland. In Report from Kevo Subarctic Research Station (pp. 35-47, Kevo Subarctic Research Station, Utsjoki, Finland.
  3. Thomas, SC, Halpern, CB, Falk, DA, Liguori, DA & Austin, KA. 1999 Plant diversity in managed forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecological applications 9, 864-879. (doi:https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0864:PDIMFU]2.0.CO;2). · DOI
  4. Phillips, PD & Vallowe, HH. 1975 Cyclic fluctuations in odor detection by female rats and the temporal influences of exogenous steroids on ovariectomized rats. In Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science (pp. 160-164, JSTOR.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmitt, M., Rudolph, M., Jacobson, S., & Plotnik, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • The Graduate Center, CUNY (US)
Published
2023-04-24
OpenAlex
W4366815532
Cited by
2
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
EcoEvoRxiv (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
olfactory sensitivity, odor discrimination, savanna elephant, Asian elephant, African bush elephant, African forest elephant, habitat diversity, resource location, species divergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review