The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On large‐scale circulations in convecting atmospheres
Abstract
The dominant thinking about the interaction between large‐scale atmospheric circulations and moist convection holds that convection acts as a heat source for the large‐scale circulations, while the latter supply water vapour to the convection. We show that this idea has led to fundamental misconceptions about this interaction, and offer an alternative paradigm, based on the idea that convection is nearly in statistical equilibrium with its environment. According to the alternative paradigm, the vertical temperature profile itself, rather than the heating, is controlled by the convection, which ties the temperature directly to the subcloud‐layer entropy. The understanding of large‐scale circulations in convecting atmospheres can, therefore, be regarded as a problem of understanding the distribution in space and time of the subcloud‐layer entropy. We show that the subcloud‐layer entropy is controlled by the sea surface temperature, the surface wind speed, and the large‐scale vertical velocity in the convecting layer, and demonstrate how the recognition of this control leads to a simple, physically consistent view of large‐scale flows, ranging from the Hadley and Walker circulations to the 30–50‐day oscillation. In particular, we argue that the direct effect of convection on large‐scale circulations is to reduce by roughly an order of magnitude the effective static stability felt by such circulations, and to damp all of them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Available potential energy and the maintenance of the general circulation.
Lorenz, E. N. (1955) · Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.3402/tellusa.v7i2.8796 · Cited by 1,227
Emanuel, K. A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066302.001.0001 · Cited by 1,205
Self-citation
Cited by
Zhang, C. (2005) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2004rg000158 · Cited by 2,178
An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress
Sherwood, S. C., & Huber, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0913352107 · Cited by 1,236
Hourdin, F., Musat, I., Bony, S., Braconnot, P., Codron, F., Dufresne, J.-L., Fairhead, L., Filiberti, M.-A., Friedlingstein, P., Grandpeix, J.-Y., et al. (2006) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0158-0 · Cited by 844
Warming Early Mars with Carbon Dioxide Clouds That Scatter Infrared Radiation
Forget, F., & Pierrehumbert, R. T. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.278.5341.1273 · Cited by 475
Representing Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Convection in Large-Scale Models
Bechtold, P., Semane, N., Lopez, P., Chaboureau, J.-P., Beljaars, A., & Bormann, N. (2014) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-13-0163.1 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Emanuel, K. A., David Neelin, J., & Bretherton, C. S.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 519
- Pages
- 1111-1143
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W1989638758
- Cited by
- 872
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On large‐scale circulations in convecting atmospheres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712051902
- The paper
- Emanuel, K. A., David Neelin, J., & Bretherton, C. S. (1994). On large‐scale circulations in convecting atmospheres. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.