The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model
Abstract
An explicit microphysical parametrization including ice physics was developed for use in the NCAR/Penn State Mesoscale Model Version 5 (MM5). This scheme includes three options of increasing complexity to represent the hydrometeor species. The scheme is evaluated by comparing model simulations with two well observed winter storms that occurred during the Winter Icing and Storms Project. The evaluation focused on the prediction of supercooled liquid water (SLW), which is of particular importance to aircraft icing. The intercomparisons showed that: The double‐moment microphysical scheme, in which both ice mixing ratios and number concentrations were predicted, performed best, with close agreement to the observed fields. The single‐moment schemes, in which the mixing ratio of ice species are predicted and number concentration specified, performed reasonably well if a diagnostic equation for No, s, the Y‐intercept of the assumed exponential snow distribution, is allowed to vary with snow mixing ratio. Accurate microphysical simulations of SLW in shallow upslope clouds and cyclonic storms required accurate simulations of the kinematic and thermodynamic structure and evolution of the storms. Though the two storms were dynamically different, the SLW formed through a balance of the condensational growth of cloud water and the depletion of cloud water by deposition and riming of snow and/or graupel for both storms. The results of this study suggest that accurate prediction of SLW over limited areas of the country may be possible using the current microphysical parametrization and high‐resolution grids (δχ <10 km).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hong, S.-Y., Dudhia, J., & Chen, S.-H. (2004) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0103:aratim>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,581
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504
Thompson, G., Rasmussen, R. M., & Manning, K. (2004) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:efowpu>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,159
Self-citationMesoscale Weather Prediction with the RUC Hybrid Isentropic–Terrain-Following Coordinate Model
Benjamin, S. G., Grell, G. A., Brown, J. M., Smirnova, T. G., & Bleck, R. (2004) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0473:mwpwtr>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 287
Parameterization of cold‐season processes in the MAPS land‐surface scheme
Smirnova, T. G., Brown, J. M., Benjamin, S. G., & Kim, D. (2000) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/1999jd901047 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Reisner, J., Rasmussen, R. M., & Bruintjes, R. T.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 548
- Pages
- 1071-1107
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2096671520
- Cited by
- 996
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712454804
- The paper
- Reisner, J., Rasmussen, R. M., & Bruintjes, R. T. (1998). Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712454804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.