The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Revision of convection, radiation and cloud schemes in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system
Abstract
Revisions to the convection, radiation and cloud schemes recently introduced into the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) are described, together with discussion of their impact upon model performance. Seasonal simulations with observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) for June/July/August 1987 and December/January/February 1987/88 with a low‐resolution (T63) version of the model are used to assess the impact of the revised schemes, concentrating upon tropical climate and variability. While the revisions improve the physical basis of the schemes, and each improves aspects of the seasonal climate, overall improvement does not result until the changes are combined. Biases in simulated temperature and top‐of‐atmosphere and surface energy budgets are reduced, leading to a substantial decrease of an equatorial SST cold bias in coupled ocean‐atmosphere simulations used in seasonal forecasting. At higher resolution (T213) changes to temperature and wind fields are similar to those found in seasonal simulations, with little impact upon medium‐range forecast performance in mid latitudes, although these forecasts proved a more critical test of the impact of the schemes upon mid‐latitude flows. The paper demonstrates the methodology used in the development of parametrizations of physical processes at ECMWF, and points to the need to balance parametrization improvements especially between schemes which are highly interactive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update
Kain, J. S. (2004) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<0170:tkcpau>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,964
Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability
Kalnay, E. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511802270 · Cited by 3,391
Palmer, T. N., Alessandri, A., Andersen, U., Cantelaube, P., Davey, M., Délécluse, P., Déqué, M., Díez, E., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Feddersen, H., et al. (2004) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-85-6-853 · Cited by 959
Hourdin, F., Musat, I., Bony, S., Braconnot, P., Codron, F., Dufresne, J.-L., Fairhead, L., Filiberti, M.-A., Friedlingstein, P., Grandpeix, J.-Y., et al. (2006) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0158-0 · Cited by 844
Representing Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Convection in Large-Scale Models
Bechtold, P., Semane, N., Lopez, P., Chaboureau, J.-P., Beljaars, A., & Bormann, N. (2014) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/jas-d-13-0163.1 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, D., Morcrette, J. ‐., Jakob, C., Beljaars, A. C. M., & Stockdale, T.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 566
- Pages
- 1685-1710
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W2011758562
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revision of convection, radiation and cloud schemes in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712656607
- The paper
- Gregory, D., Morcrette, J. ‐., Jakob, C., Beljaars, A. C. M., & Stockdale, T. (2000). Revision of convection, radiation and cloud schemes in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.