Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predictability and the relationship between subseasonal and interannual variability during the Asian summer monsoon

Sperber, Kenneth R., Slingo, Julia M., Annamalai, H.·2000·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

The relationship between subseasonal and interannual variability of the Asian summer monsoon has been investigated through analysis of the dominant modes of variability in the 40‐year NCEP/NCAR Re‐analysis, with complementary satellite and surface‐based precipitation data. The hypothesis that the characteristics of monsoon subseasonal variability (i.e. weather regimes) are modulated on interannual time‐scales in a systematic and therefore predictable manner has been tested. The null hypothesis is that predictability of the seasonal mean monsoon behaviour requires that the effects of the slowly varying components of the climate system be correctly simulated. An interannual mode of monsoon variability has been identified which is closely related to the observed seasonal mean all‐India Rainfall (AIR). A counterpart of this mode has also been identified at subseasonal time‐scales which projects strongly on to the daily AIR, confirming that a common mode of monsoon variability exists on sub‐seasonal and interannual time‐scales. It has been shown that the temporal behaviour of this subseasonal mode, as described by the probability distribution function (PDF) of the principal component time series, does not show any evidence of bimodality, the shape of the PDF being Gaussian. Further, it has been shown that the mean of the PDF is systematically and significantly perturbed towards negative (positive) values in weak (strong) monsoon years as categorized in terms of the seasonal mean AIR. This translation in the mean of the PDF, rather than a change in shape of the PDF, suggests that anomalous monsoons are not associated with changes in weather regimes. Further analysis has confirmed that low‐frequency modulation of the basic state is primarily responsible for these shifts in the subseasonal PDFs, supporting the null hypothesis that predictability of the seasonal mean monsoon requires that the effects of the slowly varying components of the climate system be correctly simulated. Thus, model improvements to reduce systematic errors in the mean simulation and the response to low‐frequency boundary forcing may improve the prospects for dynamical seasonal prediction. However, the results indicate that only a subset of the subseasonal modes are systematically perturbed either by the El Nino Southern Oscillation or in weak vs. strong monsoon years, suggesting that predictability is likely to be limited by the chaotic, internal variability of the monsoon system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.49712656810

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Sperber, K. R., Slingo, J. M., & Annamalai, H.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-07
Volume
126
Issue
568
Pages
2545-2574
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2113187996
Cited by
204
References
0
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictability and the relationship between subseasonal and interannual variability during the Asian summer monsoon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712656810
The paper
Sperber, K. R., Slingo, J. M., & Annamalai, H. (2000). Predictability and the relationship between subseasonal and interannual variability during the Asian summer monsoon. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656810

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.