The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar
Abstract
The predictions of general‐circulation models (GCMs) are sensitive to the assumed cloud overlap within a vertical column of model grid boxes, but until now no reliable observations of the degree of cloud overlap have been available. In this note we derive the overlap characteristics of clouds from 71 days of high vertical resolution 94 GHz cloud radar data in the UK. It is found that, contrary to the assumption made in most models, vertically continuous clouds tend not to be maximally overlapped. Rather, the overlap of clouds at two levels tends to fall rapidly as their vertical separation is increased, and for levels more than 4 km apart, overlap is essentially random. A simple inverse‐exponential expression for the degree of overlap as a function of level separation is proposed that could, once results become available from a variety of other locations and seasons, be implemented in current GCMs with relatively little difficulty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The New GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM2–LM2: Evaluation with Prescribed SST Simulations
(2004) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-3223.1 · Cited by 854
Clouds and the Faint Young Sun Paradox
Goldblatt, C., & Zahnle, K. J. (2011) · Climate of the Past · doi:10.5194/cp-7-203-2011 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Hogan, R. J., & Illingworth, A. J.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 569
- Pages
- 2903-2909
- ISSN
- 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-870X
- OpenAlex
- W1970744609
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.49712656914
- The paper
- Hogan, R. J., & Illingworth, A. J. (2000). Deriving cloud overlap statistics from radar. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.