Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assimilation of Global Positioning System radio occultation data in the ECMWF ERA–Interim reanalysis

Poli, P., Healy, S. B., Dee, D. P.·2010·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

This article presents results of the assimilation of Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation (RO) bending‐angle data from CHAMP, FORMOSAT‐3/COSMIC and MetOp‐A GRAS in the European Centre for Medium‐range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) global reanalysis ERA–Interim. We find that GPSRO data present the highest daily assimilation percentage rate among all the various types of observations, suggesting that these data are readily usable by today's reanalysis systems. Over time, except when additional GPSRO data are introduced, the ERA–Interim short‐term forecasts (background) are found to be stable compared with GPSRO data, and so are the ERA–Interim temperatures compared with radiosondes. This suggests that the GPSRO data are potentially as stable as the verification used here, at least to the extent that the possible quality variations in GPSRO data assimilated in ERA–Interim appear invisible when compared with radiosondes. We observe very good consistency between data from all six COSMIC receivers. Small differences between COSMIC and CHAMP (GRAS) data are observed in the lower troposphere (stratosphere). The mean effect of adding GPSRO data in ERA–Interim is to reduce temperature biases with respect to radiosondes in the ERA–Interim background by warming the tropopause region and lower stratosphere by about 0.1–0.2 K in all hemispheres. We also find hints of a drying effect in the mean water‐vapour content in the Tropics in ERA–Interim when GPSRO data are introduced. The fit to upper tropospheric wind observations in the Southern Hemisphere and the Tropics is also improved when GPSRO data are present. Overall the GPSRO data act as references via variational bias correction to correct satellite radiances. Removing the GPSRO data from the ERA–Interim system leaves the latter more prone to fitting the warmly biased aircraft data. All these effects mostly became apparent when large amounts of GPSRO data started being assimilated, at the end of 2006, with the introduction of COSMIC data. Copyright © 2010 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.722

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Poli, P., Healy, S. B., & Dee, D. P.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
136
Issue
653
Pages
1972-1990
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2104551033
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
6.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assimilation of Global Positioning System radio occultation data in the ECMWF ERA–Interim reanalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.722
The paper
Poli, P., Healy, S. B., & Dee, D. P. (2010). Assimilation of Global Positioning System radio occultation data in the ECMWF ERA–Interim reanalysis. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.722

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.