Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Atmospheric conservation properties in ERA‐Interim

Berrisford, P., Kållberg, P., Kobayashi, S., Dee, D., Uppala, S., Simmons, A. J., Poli, P., Sato, H.·2011·Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Abstract

We study the global atmospheric budgets of mass, moisture, energy and angular momentum in the latest reanalysis from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), ERA‐Interim, for the period 1989–2008 and compare with ERA‐40. Most of the measures we use indicate that the ERA‐Interim reanalysis is superior in quality to ERA‐40. In ERA‐Interim the standard deviation of the monthly mean global dry mass of 0.7 kg m−2 (0.007%) is slightly worse than in ERA‐40, and long time‐scale variations in dry mass originate predominately in the surface pressure field. The divergent winds are improved in ERA‐Interim: the global standard deviation of the time‐averaged dry mass budget residual is 10 kg m−2 day−1 and the quality of the cross‐equatorial mass fluxes is improved. The temporal variations in the global evaporation minus precipitation (E − P) are too large but the global moisture budget residual is 0.003 kg m−2 day−1 with a spatial standard deviation of 0.3 kg m−2 day−1. Both the E − P over ocean and P − E over land are about 15% larger than the 1.1 Tg s−1 transport of water from ocean to land. The top of atmosphere (TOA) net energy losses are improved, with a value of 1 W m−2, but the meridional gradient of the TOA net energy flux is smaller than that from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) data. At the surface the global energy losses are worse, with a value of 7 W m−2. Over land however, the energy loss is only 0.5 W m−2. The downwelling thermal radiation at the surface in ERA‐Interim of 341 W m−2 is towards the higher end of previous estimates. The global mass‐adjusted energy budget residual is 8 W m−2 with a spatial standard deviation of 11 W m−2, and the mass‐adjusted atmospheric energy transport from low to high latitudes (the sum for the two hemispheres) is 9.5 PW. Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qj.864

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Berrisford, P., Kållberg, P., Kobayashi, S., Dee, D., Uppala, S., Simmons, A. J., Poli, P., & Sato, H.
Venue
Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07
Volume
137
Issue
659
Pages
1381-1399
ISSN
  • 0035-9009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-870X
OpenAlex
W2084571691
Cited by
382
References
0
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atmospheric conservation properties in ERA‐Interim. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qj.864
The paper
Berrisford, P., Kållberg, P., Kobayashi, S., Dee, D., Uppala, S., Simmons, A. J., Poli, P., & Sato, H. (2011). Atmospheric conservation properties in ERA‐Interim. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.864

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.