The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable Selection in QSAR Studies. I. An Evolutionary Algorithm
Abstract
In QSAR studies of large data sets, variable selection and model building is a difficult, time‐consuming and ambiguous procedure. While most often stepwise regression procedures are applied for this purpose, other strategies, like neural networks, cluster significance analysis or genetic algorithms have been used. A simple and efficient evolutionary strategy, including iterative mutation and selection, but avoiding crossover of regression models, is described in this work. The MUSEUM (Mutation and Selection Uncover Models) algorithm starts from a model containing any number of randomly chosen variables. Random mutation, first by addition or elimination of only one or very few variables, afterwards by simultaneous random additions, eliminations and/or exchanges of several variables at a time, leads to new models which are evaluated by an appropriate fitness function. In contrast to common genetic algorithm procedures, only the “fittest” model is stored and used for further mutation and selection, leading to better and better models. In the last steps of mutation, all variables inside the model are eliminated and all variables outside the model are added, one by one, to control whether this systematic strategy detects any mutation which still improves the model. After every generation of a better model, a new random mutation procedure starts from this model. In the very last step, variables not significant at the 95% level are eliminated, starting with the least significant variable. In this manner, “stable” models are produced, containing only significant variables. A comparison of the results for the Selwood data set (n = 31 compounds, k = 53 variables) with those obtained by other groups shows that more relevant models are derived by the evolutionary approach than by other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cramer, R. D., Patterson, D. E., & Bunce, J. D. (1988) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00226a005 · Cited by 3,931
Cited by
Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks
Svozil, D., Kvasnicka, V., & Pospichal, J. (1997) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(97)00061-0 · Cited by 1,600
Eriksson, L., Jaworska, J., Worth, A. P., Cronin, M. T. D., McDowell, R. M., & Gramatica, P. (2003) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.5758 · Cited by 1,325
Schüürmann, G., Ebert, R.-U., Chen, J., Wang, B., & Kühne, R. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci800253u · Cited by 531
Zheng, W., & Tropsha, A. (2000) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci980033m · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubiny, H.
- Venue
- Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 0931-8771 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3838
- OpenAlex
- W2146178879
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable Selection in QSAR Studies. I. An Evolutionary Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/qsar.19940130306
- The paper
- Kubiny, H. (1994). Variable Selection in QSAR Studies. I. An Evolutionary Algorithm. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1002/qsar.19940130306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.