Cited by 23Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental Quantum Embedding for Machine Learning

Open access

Abstract

The classification of big data usually requires a mapping onto new data clusters which can then be processed by machine learning algorithms by means of more efficient and feasible linear separators. Recently, Lloyd et al. have advanced the proposal to embed classical data into quantum ones: these live in the more complex Hilbert space where they can get split into linearly separable clusters. Here, these ideas are implemented by engineering two different experimental platforms, based on quantum optics and ultra‐cold atoms, respectively, where we adapt and numerically optimize the quantum embedding protocol by deep learning methods, and test it for some trial classical data. A similar analysis is also performed on the Rigetti superconducting quantum computer. Therefore, it is found that the quantum embedding approach successfully works also at the experimental level and, in particular, we show how different platforms could work in a complementary fashion to achieve this task. These studies might pave the way for future investigations on quantum machine learning techniques especially based on hybrid quantum technologies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/qute.202100140

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The available body of literature on QML on cold atom machines is astonishingly scarce, to the best of the authors' knowledge.

    “Yet, and with the other notable exception of Ref. [116], the available body of literature on QML on cold atom machines is astonishingly scarce, to the best of our knowledge”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. J.Schmidhuber Neural Networks2015 61. · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/rob.21918 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sebe N., 2005, Machine Learning in Computer Vision
  5. 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Goodfellow I., 2016, Deep Learning
  7. 10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Sutton R. S., 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
  9. S.Lloyd M.Schud A.Ijaz J.Izaac N.Killoran arXiv:2001.036222020.
  10. Wittek P., 2014, Quantum Machine Learning: What Quantum Computing Means to Data Mining
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240501 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/sciadv.aau1946 · DOI
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.230504 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/s41534-020-0248-6 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.160401 · DOI
  16. 10.1364/OPTICA.389482 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.160504 · DOI
  18. V.Gebhart M.Bohmann K.Weiher N.Biagi A.Zavatta M.Bellini E.Agudelo arXiv:2101.071122021.
  19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.100503 · DOI
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.230502 · DOI
  21. S. P.Nolan A.Smerzi L.Pezzé arXiv:2006.023692020.
  22. S.Martina S.Gherardini F.Caruso arXiv:2101.032212021.
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090405 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1714936115 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/35098037 · DOI
  26. E.Farhi J.Goldstone S.Gutmann arXiv:1411.40282014.
  27. H.Neven V. S.Denchev G.Rose W. G.Macready arXiv:0811.04162008.
  28. V. S.Denchev N.Ding S. V. N.Vishwanathan H.Neven arXiv:1205.11482012.
  29. 10.1007/s11128-012-0506-4 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nature24047 · DOI
  31. J. S.Otterbach R.Manenti N.Alidoust A.Bestwick M.Block B.Bloom S.Caldwell N.Didier E. S.Fried S.Hong P.Karalekas C. B.Osborn A.Papageorge E. C.Peterson G.Prawiroatmodjo N.Rubin C. A.Ryan D.Scarabelli M.Scheer E. A.Sete P.Sivarajah R. S.Smith A.Staley N.Tezak W. J.Zeng A.Hudson B. R.Johnson M.Reagor M. P.daSilva C.Rigetti arXiv:1712.057712017.
  32. Vinci W., 2020, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Tech., 1, 4
  33. 10.1209/0295-5075/132/60004 · DOI
  34. 10.1023/A:1018628609742 · DOI
  35. V.Bergholm J.Izaac M.Schuld C.Gogolin C.Blank K.McKiernan N.Killoran arXiv:1811.04968. · arXiv
  36. 10.1126/sciadv.aao3603 · DOI
  37. R. S.Smith M. J.Curtis W. J.Zeng arXiv:1608.033552016.
  38. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/043002 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.010304 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/BF01326984 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gianani, I., Mastroserio, I., Buffoni, L., Bruno, N., Donati, L., Cimini, V., Barbieri, M., Cataliotti, F. S., & Caruso, F.
Affiliations
  • Roma Tre University (IT)
  • European Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy (IT)
Corresponding author
Caruso, Filippo
Venue
Advanced Quantum Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-09
Volume
5
Issue
8
ISSN
2511-9044 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173541387
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Quantum Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • INO Open Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies (828946)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum embedding, quantum machine learning, linear separability, quantum clustering, quantum optics, ultracold atoms, deep learning optimization, big data classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review