The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Quantum Embedding for Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
The classification of big data usually requires a mapping onto new data clusters which can then be processed by machine learning algorithms by means of more efficient and feasible linear separators. Recently, Lloyd et al. have advanced the proposal to embed classical data into quantum ones: these live in the more complex Hilbert space where they can get split into linearly separable clusters. Here, these ideas are implemented by engineering two different experimental platforms, based on quantum optics and ultra‐cold atoms, respectively, where we adapt and numerically optimize the quantum embedding protocol by deep learning methods, and test it for some trial classical data. A similar analysis is also performed on the Rigetti superconducting quantum computer. Therefore, it is found that the quantum embedding approach successfully works also at the experimental level and, in particular, we show how different platforms could work in a complementary fashion to achieve this task. These studies might pave the way for future investigations on quantum machine learning techniques especially based on hybrid quantum technologies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The available body of literature on QML on cold atom machines is astonishingly scarce, to the best of the authors' knowledge.
“Yet, and with the other notable exception of Ref. [116], the available body of literature on QML on cold atom machines is astonishingly scarce, to the best of our knowledge”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [116]
Citations
Cites
The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.
Rosenblatt, F. (1958) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042519 · Cited by 12,280
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982
Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model
Kadowaki, T., & Nishimori, H. (1998) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.58.5355 · Cited by 2,339
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- J.Schmidhuber Neural Networks2015 61. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/rob.21918 · DOI · Paper page
- Sebe N., 2005, Machine Learning in Computer Vision
- 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947 · DOI · Paper page
- Goodfellow I., 2016, Deep Learning
- 10.1007/978-0-387-45528-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Sutton R. S., 2018, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
- S.Lloyd M.Schud A.Ijaz J.Izaac N.Killoran arXiv:2001.036222020.
- Wittek P., 2014, Quantum Machine Learning: What Quantum Computing Means to Data Mining
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240501 · DOI
- 10.1126/sciadv.aau1946 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.230504 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41534-020-0248-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.160401 · DOI
- 10.1364/OPTICA.389482 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.160504 · DOI
- V.Gebhart M.Bohmann K.Weiher N.Biagi A.Zavatta M.Bellini E.Agudelo arXiv:2101.071122021.
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.100503 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.230502 · DOI
- S. P.Nolan A.Smerzi L.Pezzé arXiv:2006.023692020.
- S.Martina S.Gherardini F.Caruso arXiv:2101.032212021.
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.090405 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1714936115 · DOI
- 10.1038/35098037 · DOI
- E.Farhi J.Goldstone S.Gutmann arXiv:1411.40282014.
- H.Neven V. S.Denchev G.Rose W. G.Macready arXiv:0811.04162008.
- V. S.Denchev N.Ding S. V. N.Vishwanathan H.Neven arXiv:1205.11482012.
- 10.1007/s11128-012-0506-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature24047 · DOI
- J. S.Otterbach R.Manenti N.Alidoust A.Bestwick M.Block B.Bloom S.Caldwell N.Didier E. S.Fried S.Hong P.Karalekas C. B.Osborn A.Papageorge E. C.Peterson G.Prawiroatmodjo N.Rubin C. A.Ryan D.Scarabelli M.Scheer E. A.Sete P.Sivarajah R. S.Smith A.Staley N.Tezak W. J.Zeng A.Hudson B. R.Johnson M.Reagor M. P.daSilva C.Rigetti arXiv:1712.057712017.
- Vinci W., 2020, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Tech., 1, 4
- 10.1209/0295-5075/132/60004 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1018628609742 · DOI
- V.Bergholm J.Izaac M.Schuld C.Gogolin C.Blank K.McKiernan N.Killoran arXiv:1811.04968. · arXiv
- 10.1126/sciadv.aao3603 · DOI
- R. S.Smith M. J.Curtis W. J.Zeng arXiv:1608.033552016.
- 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/043002 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.010304 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01326984 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective
Wintersperger, K., Dommert, F., Ehmer, T., Hoursanov, A., Klepsch, J., Mauerer, W., Reuber, G., Strohm, T., Yin, M., & Luber, S. (2023) · EPJ Quantum Technology · doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-023-00190-1 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Gianani, I., Mastroserio, I., Buffoni, L., Bruno, N., Donati, L., Cimini, V., Barbieri, M., Cataliotti, F. S., & Caruso, F.
- Affiliations
- Roma Tre University (IT)
- European Laboratory for Non-Linear Spectroscopy (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Caruso, Filippo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Advanced Quantum Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-06-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 2511-9044 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3173541387
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advanced Quantum Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- INO Open Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- H2020 Future and Emerging Technologies (828946)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum embedding, quantum machine learning, linear separability, quantum clustering, quantum optics, ultracold atoms, deep learning optimization, big data classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review