Cited by 1,809Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsReinforcement Learning in Robotics

A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving

Open access
Grigorescu, Sorin, Trasnea, Bogdan, Cocias, Tiberiu, Macesanu, Gigel·2020·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self‐driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in the area of deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of this paper is to survey the current state‐of‐the‐art on deep learning technologies used in autonomous driving. We start by presenting AI‐based self‐driving architectures, convolutional and recurrent neural networks, as well as the deep reinforcement learning paradigm. These methodologies form a base for the surveyed driving scene perception, path planning, behavior arbitration, and motion control algorithms. We investigate both the modular perception‐planning‐action pipeline, where each module is built using deep learning methods, as well as End2End systems, which directly map sensory information to steering commands. Additionally, we tackle current challenges encountered in designing AI architectures for autonomous driving, such as their safety, training data sources, and computational hardware. The comparison presented in this survey helps gain insight into the strengths and limitations of deep learning and AI approaches for autonomous driving and assist with design choices.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This survey reviews deep learning and AI methods for autonomous driving, covering CNN/RNN/DRL foundations, modular and End2End architectures, perception, planning, control, safety, datasets, and hardware. It concludes that deep learning is central to self-driving development, but functional safety, corner-case data, and real-time deployment remain open challenges.

Key findings

  • The paper surveys two main AI-based self-driving architectures: a modular perception-planning-action pipeline and End2End systems that directly map sensory information to steering commands; the modular pipeline is decomposed into perception/localization, high-level path planning, behavior arbitration, and motion controllers.
  • End2End learning is exemplified by NVIDIA PilotNet, reported as having 250,000 parameters and approximately 27 million connections, reaching 98% autonomy on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA, with an intervention defined as departing from the center line by more than one meter and assuming 6 seconds for a human to retake control.
  • Public datasets vary widely in sensor setup, size, and license: KITTI provides 6 hours of driving data and more than 2000 citations; NuScenes contains 1000 driving scenes, 25 annotated object classes at 2 Hz, and is planned to include approximately 1.4 million camera images, 400,000 LiDAR sweeps, 1.3 million RADAR sweeps, and 1.1 million object bounding boxes in 40,000 keyframes; Cityscapes has 5000 finely annotated and 20000 coarsely annotated images; Oxford spans over 1000 km and almost 20 million images.
  • Safety remains unresolved: ISO 26262 does not address the unique characteristics of deep-learning-based software, and the paper notes the first autonomous driving accident involving a Tesla vehicle after 130 million miles of testing, caused by object misclassification under rare “Black Swan” circumstances.

Methods

  • Design: a narrative survey of deep learning and AI technologies for autonomous driving, including CNN, RNN/LSTM, and deep reinforcement learning, followed by application areas such as perception, localization, path planning, behavior arbitration, motion control, safety, data sources, and computational hardware.
  • Data or sample: literature review and comparison of published methods, architectures, and publicly available driving datasets; no new empirical experiment or primary dataset is introduced.
  • Main analysis: qualitative synthesis with comparative tables and figures, including object detection performance on Pascal VOC 2012, semantic segmentation performance on Cityscapes, a summary of End2End learning methods, and a summary of datasets for training autonomous driving systems.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: there is no master dataset combining available driving datasets, no standard requirements for data format and sensor setup, and available datasets cover only a very small portion of the world map, mostly under sunny, daylight, and urban conditions.
  • Stated in the paper: safety assurance for deep learning in safety-critical systems is still an open question; current automotive standards such as ISO 26262 cannot be fully mapped to deep-learning systems; DRL models trained in simulation tend to be biased when ported to the real world, while imitation learning data is scarce on corner cases.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative survey, it does not report a systematic search or inclusion protocol, and its performance comparisons rely on cited results and figures/tables rather than independent benchmark experiments.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.21918

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 93 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation
    § 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14

    The low-level features learned by PilotNet are similar to the ones that are relevant to a human driver.

    “A method for finding the salient object regions in the input image is described, while reaching the conclusion that the low-level features learned by PilotNet are similar to the ones that are relevant to a human driver.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112] [112] M. Bojarski, P. Yeres, A. Choromanska, K. Choromanski, B. Firner, L. Jackel, and U. Muller, 'Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Car,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07911 , 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingnone given
    § 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14

    An autonomy of 98% was reached on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands in NJ, USA.

    “An autonomy of 98% was reached on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands in NJ, USA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The largest portion of papers in deep learning for self-driving cars are focused mainly on perception and End2End learning.

    “Currently, the largest portion of papers in deep learning for selfdriving cars are focused mainly on perception and End2End learning [81, 124].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [81] [81] S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Shammah, and A. Shashua, 'Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving,' 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [124] [124] T. Zhang, G. Kahn, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, 'Learning Deep Control Policies for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles with MPC-guided Policy Search,' 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , May 2016. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487175 - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingreasoning
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    Despite extensive search, the authors have not found a master dataset that combines at least parts of the available ones.

    “Despite our extensive search, we are yet to find a master dataset that combines at least parts of the ones available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5

    A traditional RNN is not suitable for capturing long-term dependencies in sequence data.

    “Hence, a traditional RNN is not suitable for capturing long-term dependencies in sequence data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 90
  • May combine two claims. 52
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    The majority of the surveyed work is dated after 2005.

    “since the majority of the surveyed work is dated after 2005.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11

    Although DRL systems are able to explore different driving situations within a simulated world, these models tend to have a biased behavior when ported to the real-world.

    “On the other hand, although DRL systems are able to explore different driving situations within a simulated world, these models tend to have a biased behavior when ported to the real-world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14

    The evaluation of the Tesla Autopilot comparison framework revealed an accuracy of 90.4% in detecting differences between both systems and the control transfer of the car to a human driver.

    “The evaluation revealed an accuracy of 90 . 4% in detecting differences between both systems and the control transfer of the car to a human driver.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11

    Imitation Learning has the advantage that it can be trained with data collected from the real-world, but this data is scarce on corner cases, making the trained network's response uncertain when confronted with unseen data.

    “IL has the advantage that it can be trained with data collected from the real-world. Nevertheless, this data is scarce on corner cases (e.g. driving off-lanes, vehicle crashes, etc.), making the trained network's response uncertain when confronted with unseen data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8

    Single stage detectors do not provide the same performances as double stage detectors, but are significantly faster.

    “In general, single stage detectors do not provide the same performances as double stage detectors, but are significantly faster.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.2.3 Localization · p. 10

    VO techniques are still dominated by classical keypoints matching algorithms, combined with acceleration data provided by inertial sensors, mainly because keypoints detectors are computationally efficient and can be easily deployed on embedded devices.

    “Although much progress has been reported in the area of deep learning based localization, VO techniques are still dominated by classical keypoints matching algorithms, combined with acceleration data provided by inertial sensors. This is mainly due to the fact that keypoints detectors are computational efficient and can be easily deployed on embedded devices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 13

    PilotNet has 250,000 parameters and approximately 27 million connections.

    “PilotNet has 250 . 000 parameters and approx. 27 mil . connections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16

    The sensors setup differs from vehicle to vehicle, depending on how the data is planned to be used.

    “The sensors setup differs from vehicle to vehicle, depending on how the data is planned to be used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The authors have identified seven major areas that form open challenges in autonomous driving.

    “We have identified seven major areas that form open challenges in the field of autonomous driving.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16

    Many driving datasets were made public and documented in recent years due to increasing research interest in autonomous vehicles.

    “In the last years, mainly due to the large and increasing research interest in autonomous vehicles, many driving datasets were made public and documented.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16

    Public driving datasets vary in size, sensor setup and data format.

    “They vary in size, sensor setup and data format.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    Given the advancements in deep reinforcement learning, the direct application of the algorithm still needs a training pipeline in which one should simulate and model the desired self-driving car's behavior.

    “Given the advancements in deep reinforcement learning, the direct application of the algorithm still needs a training pipeline in which one should simulate and model the desired self-driving car's behavior.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    The model-based policy iteration algorithm was introduced based on the proof that the Bellman equation is a contraction mapping.

    “The model-based policy iteration algorithm was introduced in [18], based on the proof that the Bellman equation is a contraction mapping [20] when written as an operator n :”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] [18] R. Sutton and A. Barto, Introduction to Reinforcement Learning . MIT Press, 1998. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [20] [20] C. Watkins and P. Dayan, 'Q-Learning,' Machine Learning , vol. 8, no. 3, p. 279292, 1992. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3

    The driving decisions in AI-powered autonomous cars are computed either in a modular perception-planning-action pipeline or in an End2End learning fashion, where sensory information is directly mapped to control outputs.

    “The driving decisions are computed either in a modular perception-planning-action pipeline (Fig. 1(a)), or in an End2End learning fashion (Fig. 1(b)), where sensory information is directly mapped to control outputs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3

    The components of the modular pipeline can be designed either based on AI and deep learning methodologies, or using classical non-learning approaches.

    “The components of the modular pipeline can be designed either based on AI and deep learning methodologies, or using classical non-learning approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    The method in [24] describes a model-free actor-critic algorithm able to learn different continuous control tasks directly from raw pixel inputs.

    “The method in [24] describes a model-free actor-critic algorithm able to learn different continuous control tasks directly from raw pixel inputs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y. Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra, 'Continuous Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2-4 May 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    In comparison to traditional handcrafted features, convolutional neural networks are able to automatically learn a representation of the feature space encoded in the training set.

    “In comparison to these traditional handcrafted features, convolutional neural networks are able to automatically learn a representation of the feature space encoded in the training set.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    A CNN mimics the functioning of the ventral flux, in which different areas of the brain are sensible to specific features in the visual field.

    “A CNN mimics the functioning of the ventral flux, in which different areas of the brain are sensible to specific features in the visual field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    The standard reinforcement learning method described above is not feasible in high dimensional state spaces.

    “However, the standard reinforcement learning method described above is not feasible in high dimensional state spaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5

    LSTMs solve the vanishing gradient problem by incorporating three gates, which control the input, output and memory state.

    “As opposed to traditional recurrent neural networks, LSTMs solve the vanishing gradient problem by incorporating three gates, which control the input, output and memory state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] [17] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, 'Long Short-term Memory,' Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    Although continuous control with DRL is possible, the most common strategy for DRL in autonomous driving is based on discrete control.

    “Although continuous control with DRL is possible, the most common strategy for DRL in autonomous driving is based on discrete control [26].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] [26] M. Jaritz, R. de Charette, M. Toromanoff, E. Perot, and F. Nashashibi, 'End-to-End Race Driving with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 2070-2075, 2018. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5

    Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are non-linear function approximators for estimating temporal dependencies in sequence data.

    “Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [17] networks are non-linear function approximators for estimating temporal dependencies in sequence data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] [17] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, 'Long Short-term Memory,' Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    DeepMind's combined algorithm, entitled Rainbow, was able to outperform the independently competing methods.

    “A study on how to combine these improvements on deep reinforcement learning has been provided by DeepMind in [22], where the combined algorithm, entitled Rainbow , was able to outperform the independently competing methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3

    A safety monitor is designed to assure the safety of each module in the modular pipeline.

    “A safety monitor is designed to assure the safety of each module.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    Convolutional Neural Networks are mainly used for processing spatial information, such as images, and can be viewed as image feature extractors and universal non-linear function approximators.

    “Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are mainly used for processing spatial information, such as images, and can be viewed as image features extractors and universal non-linear function approximators [7], [8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] [7] Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, 'Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition,' Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278-2324, Nov 1998. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] [8] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, 'Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives,' IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798-1828, Aug 2013. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    All of the above complementary improvements have been tested on the Atari 2600 challenge.

    “All of the above complementary improvements have been tested on the Atari 2600 challenge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    DeepMind proposes six extensions to the base DQN, each addressing a distinct concern.

    “DeepMind [22] proposes six extensions to the base DQN, each addressing a distinct concern:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    Before the rise of deep learning, computer vision systems used to be implemented based on handcrafted features, such as HAAR, LBP, or HoG.

    “Before the rise of deep learning, computer vision systems used to be implemented based on handcrafted features, such as HAAR [9], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [10], or Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HoG) [11].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [9] [9] P. A. Viola and M. J. Jones, 'Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features,' in 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2001), with CDROM, 8-14 December 2001, Kauai, HI, USA , 2001, pp. 511-518. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] [10] T. Ojala, M. Pietik¨ ainen, and D. Harwood, 'A Comparative Study of Texture Measures with Classification Based on Featured Distributions,' Pattern Recognition , vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51-59, Jan. 1996. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] [11] N. Dalal and B. Triggs, 'Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection,' in In CVPR , 2005, pp. 886-893. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning
    § 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5

    When compared to a conventional neural network, the only difference is that the learned weights in each unfolded copy of the RNN are averaged, thus enabling the network to share the same weights over time.

    “When compared to a conventional neural network, the only difference is that the learned weights in each unfolded copy of the network are averaged, thus enabling the network to shared the same weights over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    The turning point in self-driving car development acknowledged Machine Learning and AI as central components of autonomous driving.

    “This was a turning point in selfdriving cars development, acknowledging Machine Learning and AI as central components of autonomous driving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 5

    The Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) is the most commonly used activation function in computer vision applications.

    “Typically, the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) is the most commonly used activation function in computer vision applications [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] [1] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    A model-based solution for continuous Q-learning is proposed in [25].

    “A model-based solution for continuous Qlearning is proposed in [25].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] [25] S. Gu, T. Lillicrap, I. Sutskever, and S. Levine, 'Continuous Deep Q-Learning with Model-based Acceleration,' in Int. Conf. on Machine Learning ICML 2016 , vol. 48, Jun. 2016, pp. 2829-2838. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    In literature, such a non-linear approximator is called a Deep Q-Network (DQN) and is used for estimating the approximate action-value function.

    “In literature, such a non-linear approximator is called a Deep QNetwork (DQN) [21] and is used for estimating the approximate action-value function:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, 'Human-level Control Through Deep Reinforcement Learning,' Nature , vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, Feb. 2015. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    The deep reinforcement learning community has made several independent improvements to the original DQN algorithm.

    “The deep reinforcement learning community has made several independent improvements to the original DQN algorithm [21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, 'Human-level Control Through Deep Reinforcement Learning,' Nature , vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, Feb. 2015. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    The visual information is processed according to the dual flux theory, which states that the visual flow follows two main fluxes: a ventral flux responsible for visual identification and object recognition, and a dorsal flux used for establishing spatial relations between objects.

    “The information is processed according to the dual flux theory [13], which states that the visual flow follows two main fluxes: a ventral flux , responsible for visual identification and object recognition, and a dorsal flux used for establishing spatial relations between objects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] [13] M. A. Goodale and A. Milner, 'Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action,' Trends in Neurosciences , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20 - 25, 1992. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    In order to decode the true environment state, it is not sufficient to map a single snapshot of sensors readings; the temporal information should also be included in the network's input, since the environment's state is modified over time.

    “In order to decode the true environment state, it is not sufficient to map a single snapshot of sensors readings. The temporal information should also be included in the network's input, since the environment's state is modified over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4

    CNNs can be loosely understood as very approximate analogies to different parts of the mammalian visual cortex.

    “CNNs can be loosely understood as very approximate analogies to different parts of the mammalian visual cortex [12].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] [12] D. H. Hubel and T. N.Wiesel, 'Shape and Arrangement of Columns in Cats Striate Cortex,' The Journal of Physiology , vol. 165, no. 3, p. 559568, 1963. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 6

    The optimal action-value function Q* satisfies the Bellman optimality equation.

    “The optimal action-value function Q ∗ satisfies the Bellman optimality equation [19], which is a recursive formulation of Eq. 10:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] [19] R. Bellman, Dynamic Programming . Princeton University Press, 1957. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5

    The main challenge in using basic RNNs is the vanishing gradient encountered during training.

    “The main challenge in using basic RNNs is the vanishing gradient encountered during training.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    The DQN approach has been extended to continuous action spaces based on policy gradient estimation.

    “The DQN approach described above has been extended to continuous action spaces based on policy gradient estimation [24].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] [24] T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y. Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra, 'Continuous Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2-4 May 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7

    In the case of an autonomous car, the discrete actions would translate to discrete commands, such as turn left, turn right, accelerate, or break.

    “In the case of an autonomous car, the discrete actions would translate to discrete commands, such as turn left, turn right, accelerate, or break.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning
    § 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3

    Various permutations of learning and non-learning based components are possible in the modular pipeline.

    “Various permutations of learning and non-learning based components are possible (e.g. a deep learning based object detector provides input to a classical A-star path planning algorithm).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1 Introduction · p. 3

    Deep Learning and AI became the main technologies behind many breakthroughs in computer vision, robotics and NLP over the last decade.

    “Over the course of the last decade, Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) became the main technologies behind many breakthroughs in computer vision [1], robotics [2] and Natural Language Processing (NLP) [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] [1] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [2] [2] M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba, 'Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation,' CoRR , vol. abs/1808.00177, August 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00177 - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] [3] Y. Goldberg, Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing , ser. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool, 2017, vol. 37. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    The success of image based 3D estimation is of high importance to the large scale deployment of autonomous cars, since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.

    “The success of image based 3D estimation is of high importance to the large scale deployment of autonomous cars, since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware components in a self-driving vehicle.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    Researchers at Cornell University tried to replicate LiDAR-like point clouds from visual depth estimation.

    “Researchers at Cornell University tried to replicate LiDAR-like point clouds from visual depth estimation [32].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] [32] Y. Wang, W.-L. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, and K. Weinberger, 'Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019 , June 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9

    AVOD leverages LiDAR data only for training, while images are used during training and deployment, and at deployment stage, AVOD is able to predict 3D bounding boxes of objects solely from image data.

    “A solution here would be to use neural network architectures such as AVOD (Aggregate View Object Detection) [34], which leverage on LiDAR data only for training, while images are used during training and deployment. At deployment stage, AVODisable to predict 3D bounding boxes of objects solely from image data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [34] [34] J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh, and S. L. Waslander, 'Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation,' in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018 . IEEE, 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 13

    End2End methods have been popularized in the last couple of years by NVIDIA, as part of the PilotNet architecture; the approach is to train a CNN which maps raw pixels from a single front-facing camera directly to steering commands.

    “End2End methods have been popularized in the last couple of years by NVIDIA ® , as part of the PilotNet architecture. The approach is to train a CNN which maps raw pixels from a single front-facing camera directly to steering commands [119].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [119] [119] M. Bojarski, D. D. Testa, D. Dworakowski, B. Firner, B. Flepp, P. Goyal, L. D. Jackel, M. Monfort, U. Muller, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and K. Zieba, 'End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars,' CoRR , vol. abs/1604.07316, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    Tesla and Waymo, two of the companies leading the development of self-driving technology, have different philosophies with respect to their main perception sensor, as well as regarding the targeted SAE level.

    “Tesla ® and Waymo ® , two of the companies leading the development of self-driving technology [30], have different philosophies with respect to their main perception sensor, as well as regarding the targeted SAE level [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] [30] S. O'Kane, 'How Tesla and Waymo are Tackling a Major Problem for Self-Driving Cars: Data,' Transportation , 2018. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15

    ISO 26262 provides comprehensive requirements for assuring safety but does not address the unique characteristics of deep learning-based software.

    “The ISO 26262 standard for functional safety of road vehicles provides a comprehensive set of requirements for assuring safety, but does not address the unique characteristics of deep learning-based software.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9

    Detectors such as SqueezeNet or [55] are optimized to run on embedded hardware, have a smaller neural network architecture, making it possible to detect objects using a reduced number of operations, at the cost of detection accuracy.

    “If in-vehicle computation resources are scarce, one can use detectors such as SqueezeNet [40] or [55], which are optimized to run on embedded hardware. These detectors usually have a smaller neural network architecture, making it possible to detect objects using a reduced number of operations, at the cost of detection accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [40] [40] F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, 'Squeezenet: Alexnetlevel Accuracy with 50x Fewer Parameters and¡ 0.5 Mb Model Size,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360 , 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [55] [55] J. Li, K. Peng, and C.-C. Chang, 'An Efficient Object Detection Algorithm Based on Compressed Networks,' Symmetry , vol. 10, no. 7, p. 235, 2018. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    Waymo makes use of three Lidar sensors, five radars and eight cameras, while Tesla cars are equipped with eight cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors and one forward-facing radar.

    “For example, alongside three Lidar sensors, Waymo also makes use of five radars and eight cameras, while Tesla ® cars are equipped with eights cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors and one forward-facing radar.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    LiDARs have high resolution and precise perception even in the dark, but are vulnerable to bad weather conditions (e.g. heavy rain) and involve moving parts.

    “LiDARs have high resolution and precise perception even in the dark, but are vulnerable to bad weather conditions (e.g. heavy rain) [31] and involve moving parts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] [31] S. Hasirlioglu, A. Kamann, I. Doric, and T. Brandmeier, 'Test Methodology for Rain Influence on Automotive Surround Sensors,' in 2016 IEEE 19th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , Nov 2016, pp. 2242-2247. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15

    The use of deep learning components in safety critical systems is still an open question.

    “Regardless of the above empirical definitions and possible interpretations of safety, the use of deep learning components in safety critical systems is still an open question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 6.1 Learning Controllers · p. 12

    With every gathered batch of training data, the approximation of the true system model becomes more accurate, thus enabling model flexibility, consistent uncertainty estimates and anticipation of repeatable effects and disturbances that cannot be modeled prior to deployment.

    “With every gathered batch of training data, the approximation of the true system model becomes more accurate, thus enabling model flexibility, consistent uncertainty estimates and anticipation of repeatable effects and disturbances that cannot be modeled prior to deployment [91].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [91] [91] C. J. Ostafew, J. Collier, A. P. Schoellig, and T. D. Barfoot, 'Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control to Improve Vision-based Mobile Robot Path Tracking,' Journal of Field Robotics , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 133-152, 2015. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    The main sensing technologies differ in both companies: Tesla tries to leverage on its camera systems, whereas Waymo's driving technology relies more on Lidar sensors.

    “The main sensing technologies differ in both companies. Tesla ® tries to leverage on its camera systems, whereas Waymo's driving technology relies more on Lidar sensors 4 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15

    [130] addresses the gap by analyzing where machine learning can impact ISO 26262 and provides recommendations on how to accommodate this impact.

    “[130] addresses this gap by analyzing the places where machine learning can impact the standard and provides recommendations on how to accommodate this impact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.3 Perception using Occupancy Maps · p. 10

    Occupancy maps represent an in-vehicle virtual environment, integrating perceptual information in a form better suited for path planning and motion control.

    “Occupancy maps represent an in-vehicle virtual environment, integrating perceptual information in a form better suited for path planning and motion control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 14

    Demonstrating the safety of a system which is running deep learning techniques depends heavily on the type of technique and the application context.

    “Demonstrating the safety of a system which is running deep learning techniques depends heavily on the type of technique and the application context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § [4.2 Driving Scene Understanding](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8

    Image data is more suited for the object recognition task because it is richer in information.

    “Being richer in information, image data is more suited for the object recognition task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2.2 Semantic and Instance Segmentation · p. 9

    In [44] and [57], the authors proposed approaches to speed up data processing and inference on embedded devices for autonomous driving; both architectures are light networks providing similar results as SegNet, with reduced computation cost.

    “In [44] and [57], the authors proposed approaches to speed up data processing and inference on embedded devices for autonomous driving. Both architectures are light networks providing similar results as SegNet, with a reduced computation cost.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [44] [44] M. Treml, J. A. Arjona-Medina, T. Unterthiner, R. Durgesh, F. Friedmann, P. Schuberth, A. Mayr, M. Heusel, M. Hofmarcher, M. Widrich, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, 'Speeding up Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving,' 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [57] [57] A. Paszke, A. Chaurasia, S. Kim, and E. Culurciello, 'Enet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-time Semantic Segmentation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02147 , 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8

    Waymo is building their vehicles directly as Level 5 systems, with currently more than 10 million miles driven autonomously.

    “Waymo ® is building their vehicles directly as Level 5 systems, with currently more than 10 million miles driven autonomously 2 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] [2] M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba, 'Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation,' CoRR , vol. abs/1808.00177, August 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00177 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 6.1 Learning Controllers · p. 12

    A major advantage of learning controllers is that they optimally combine traditional model-based control theory with learning algorithms, making it possible to still use established methodologies for controller design and stability analysis, together with a robust learning component applied at system identification and prediction levels.

    “A major advantage of learning controllers is that they optimally combine traditional model-based control theory with learning algorithms. This makes it possible to still use established methodologies for controller design and stability analysis, together with a robust learning component applied at system identification and prediction levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § [4.2 Driving Scene Understanding](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8

    Deep learning based perception, in particular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), became the de-facto standard in object detection and recognition, obtaining remarkable results in competitions such as the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge.

    “Deep learning based perception, in particular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), became the de-facto standard in object detection and recognition, obtaining remarkable results in competitions such as the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge [35].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] [35] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, A. C. Berg, and L. FeiFei, 'ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge,' Int. Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) , vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211-252, 2015. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11

    The survey in [82] does not include a review on deep learning technologies, although the state of the art literature has revealed an increased interest in using deep learning technologies for path planning and behavior arbitration.

    “However, [82] does not include a review on deep learning technologies, although the state of the art literature has revealed an increased interest in using deep learning technologies for path planning and behavior arbitration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] [82] S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang, 'Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles,' Machines , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    The Oxford dataset collection spanned over 1 year, resulting in over 1000 km of recorded driving with almost 20 million images from 6 cameras, along with LIDAR, GPS and INS ground truth.

    “Provided by Oxford University, UK, the dataset collection spanned over 1 year, resulting in over 1000 km of recorded driving with almost 20 million images collected from 6 cameras mounted to the vehicle, along with LIDAR, GPS and INS ground truth.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [153] [153] W. Maddern, G. Pascoe, C. Linegar, and P. Newman, '1 Year, 1000km: The Oxford RobotCar Dataset,' The Int. Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR) , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3-15, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 20

    FPGAs provide a significant advantage over GPUs in developing driver assistance systems because FPGAs are designed to meet safety requirements while GPUs were originally built for graphics and high-performance computing where functional safety is not necessary.

    “When compared to GPUs, which were originally built for graphics and high-performance computing systems, where functional safety is not necessary, FPGAs provide a significant advantage in developing driver assistance systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    The final NuScenes dataset will include approximately 1.4 million camera images, 400,000 Lidar sweeps, 1.3 million RADAR sweeps and 1.1 million object bounding boxes in 40,000 keyframes.

    “The final dataset will include approximately 1,4 million camera images, 400.000 Lidar sweeps, 1,3 million RADAR sweeps and 1,1 million object bounding boxes in 40.000 keyframes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] [146] H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom, 'nuScenes: A multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11027 , 2019. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    The main limitations for vehicles are price, performance issues and power consumption.

    “The main limitations when it comes to vehicles are the price, performance issues and power consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15

    The probability distribution is usually unknown, precluding the use of domain adaptation techniques.

    “Usually the probability distribution is unknown, precluding the use of domain adaptation techniques [134] [135].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [134] [134] H. Daum´ e, III and D. Marcu, 'Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers,' J. Artif. Int. Res. , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 101-126, May 2006. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [135] [135] R. Caruana, Y. Lou, J. Gehrke, P. Koch, M. Sturm, and N. Elhadad, 'Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30day Readmission,' in Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2015, pp. 1721-1730. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    Machine learning and deep learning techniques are starting to become effective and reliable even for safety critical systems, though complete safety assurance remains an open question.

    “Machine learning and deep learning techniques are starting to become effective and reliable even for safety critical systems, even if the complete safety assurance for this type of systems is still an open question.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    FPGAs show great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.

    “AField-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is another viable solution, showing great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [170] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [171] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [172] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Additional work is required for bridging the gap between image- and LiDAR-based 3D perception.

    “Furthermore, additional work is required for bridging the gap between image- and LiDAR-based 3D perception [32], enabling the computer vision community to close the current debate on camera vs. LiDAR as main perception sensors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [32] [32] Y. Wang, W.-L. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, and K. Weinberger, 'Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019 , June 2019. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16

    The high amount of data needed in the development stage made data collection on public roads a valuable activity.

    “The high amount of data needed in the development stage of such components made data collection on public roads a valuable activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 19

    The majority of available datasets consider sunny, daylight and urban conditions, which are ideal operating conditions for autonomous driving systems.

    “The majority of the available datasets consider sunny, daylight and urban conditions, these being ideal operating conditions for autonomous driving systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    NVIDIA DRIVE AGX developer kit platform was presented as the world's most advanced self-driving car platform, based on Volta technology.

    “Introduced in September 2018, NVIDIA ® DRIVE AGX developer kit platform was presented as the world's most advanced self-driving car platform [166], being based on the Volta technology [167].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [166] [166] --, 'NVIDIA Drive AGX,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/self-drivingcars/drive-platform/hardware/. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [167] [167] --, 'NVIDIA Volta,' https://www.nvidia.com/enus/data-center/volta-gpu-architecture/. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    Deploying deep learning algorithms on target edge devices is not a trivial task.

    “Deploying deep learning algorithms on target edge devices is not a trivial task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    DRIVE AGX Xavier is an energy-efficient computing platform with 30 trillion operations per second, meeting ISO 26262 functional safety specification.

    “DRIVE AGX Xavier is a scalable open platform that can serve as an AI brain for self driving vehicles, and is an energy-efficient computing platform, with 30 trillion operations per second, while meeting automotive standards like the ISO 26262 functional safety specification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    NuScenes contains 1000 driving scenes collected from Boston and Singapore, with 25 object classes annotated with 3D bounding boxes at 2Hz.

    “Constructed by nuTonomy, this dataset contains 1000 driving scenes collected from Boston and Singapore, two known for their dense traffic and highly challenging driving situations. In order to facilitate common computer vision tasks, such as object detection and tracking, the providers annotated 25 object classes with accurate 3D bounding boxes at 2Hz over the entire dataset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [146] [146] H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom, 'nuScenes: A multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11027 , 2019. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    NVIDIA DRIVE PX is an AI car computer designed to enable auto-makers to focus directly on software for autonomous vehicles.

    “DRIVE PX [162] is an AI car computer which was designed to enable the auto-makers to focus directly on the software for autonomous vehicles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [162] [162] NVIDIA, 'NVIDIA AI Car Computer Drive PX,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-au/self-drivingcars/drive-px/. - [169] --, 'R-Car H3,' https://www.renesas.com/sg/en/solutions/automotive/soc/rcar-h3.html/. - [170] E. Nurvitadhi, G. Venkatesh, J. Sim, D. Marr, R. Huang, J. Ong Gee Hock, Y. T. Liew, K. Srivatsan, D. Moss, S. Subhaschandra, and G. Boudoukh, 'Can FPGAs Beat GPUs in Accelerating Next-Generation Deep Neural Networks?' in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA Int. Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays , ser. FPGA '17. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017, pp. 5-14. [Online]. Available: http://do source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    The study in [120] involved 99 participants, 29 vehicles, 405,807 miles and approximately 5.5 billion video frames.

    “The study involved 99 participants, 29 vehicles, 405 , 807 miles and approximatively 5 . 5 billion video frames.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16

    The usage of real world data is a key requirement for training and testing an autonomous driving component.

    “Undeniably, the usage of real world data is a key requirement for training and testing an autonomous driving component.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Deep learning is the main technology behind a large number of perception systems.

    “Deep learning is the main technology behind a large number of perception systems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    Each dataset heavily depends on the objective of the algorithm for which the data was collected.

    “Each dataset heavily depends on the objective of the algorithm for which the data was collected.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Long-term reasoning is solved, as provided by navigation systems, which are standard methods for selecting a route through the road network.

    “We consider long-term reasoning as solved, as provided by navigation systems. These are standard methods for selecting a route through the road network, from the car's current position to destination [82].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [82] [82] S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang, 'Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles,' Machines , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, 2017. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15

    Hazards unique to deep reinforcement learning components can be traced to faults and fit within existing ISO 26262 guidelines.

    “Although hazards such as these may be unique to deep reinforcement learning components, they can be traced to faults, thus fitting within the existing guidelines of ISO 26262.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Current perception systems are mainly designed to calculate 2D or 3D bounding boxes for a couple of trained object classes, or to provide a segmented image of the driving environment.

    “Although great progress has been reported with respect to accuracy in object detection and recognition [173], current systems are mainly designed to calculate 2D or 3D bounding boxes for a couple of trained object classes, or to provide a segmented image of the driving environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [173] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    ISO 26262 states that component behavior shall be fully specified and each refinement shall be verified with respect to its specification.

    “ISO 26262 standard states that the component behavior shall be fully specified and each refinement shall be verified with respect to its specification.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    Despite 130 million miles of testing, the Tesla accident was caused under extremely rare circumstances (Black Swans) due to truck height, white color under bright sky, and vehicle positioning.

    “Despite the 130 million miles of testing and evaluation, the accident was caused under extremely rare circumstances, also known as Black Swans, given the height of the truck, its white color under bright sky, combined with the positioning of the vehicle across the road.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [137] [137] S. Levin, 'Tesla Fatal Crash: 'Autopilot' Mode Sped up Car Before Driver Killed, Report Finds,' The Guardian , 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    Current standards and regulation from the automotive industry cannot be fully mapped to deep learning systems, requiring new safety standards targeted for deep learning.

    “Current standards and regulation from the automotive industry cannot be fully mapped to such systems, requiring the development of new safety standards targeted for deep learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    NVIDIA DRIVE PX is capable of real-time environment perception, path planning and localization, combining deep learning, sensor fusion and surround vision.

    “NVIDIA ® DRIVE PX is capable to perform real-time environment perception, path planning and localization. It combines deep learning, sensor fusion and surround vision to improve the driving experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    The newest version of DrivePX architecture is based on two Tegra X2 systems on a chip, each containing two Denver cores, 4 ARM A57 cores and a Pascal-generation GPU.

    “The newest version of DrivePX architecture is based on two Tegra X2 [163] systems on a chip (SoCs). Each SoC contains two Denve [164] cores, 4 ARM A57 cores and a graphical computeing unit (GPU) from the Pascal [165] generation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [163] [163] --, 'Tegra X2,' https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-tx2-deliverstwice-intelligence-edge/. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [164] [164] --, 'Denver Core,' https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/nvidia/microarchitectures/denver. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [165] [165] --, 'Pascal Microarchitecture,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/pascalgpu-architecture/. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    The data collected in the study in [120] is not available for the public.

    “Unfortunately, the data collected in this study is not available for the public.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    Faults and failures of a programmed component are totally different from those of a deep learning component.

    “Faults and failures of a programmed component (e.g. one using a formal algorithm to solve a problem) are totally different from the ones of a deep learning component.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    The first autonomous driving accident was produced by a Tesla car, where object misclassification errors caused AutoPilot to collide with a truck.

    “We must mention the first autonomous driving accident, produced by a Tesla ® car, where, due to object misclassification errors, the AutoPilot function collided the vehicle into a truck [137].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [137] [137] S. Levin, 'Tesla Fatal Crash: 'Autopilot' Mode Sped up Car Before Driver Killed, Report Finds,' The Guardian , 2018. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19

    Embedded platforms are becoming essential for integration of AI algorithms inside vehicles due to their portability, versatility, and energy efficiency.

    “Therefore, embedded platforms are becoming essential for integration of AI algorithms inside vehicles due to their portability, versatility, and energy efficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17

    KITTI is known as the most prestigious dataset in the self-driving vehicles domain and counts more than 2000 citations.

    “It is known as the most prestigious dataset in the self-driving vehicles domain. To this date it counts more than 2000 citations in the literature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [151] [151] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, C. Stiller, and R. Urtasun, 'Vision Meets Robotics: The KITTI Dataset,' The Int. Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 12311237, 2013. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16

    Specific faults of a deep learning component can be caused by unreliable or noisy sensor signals, neural network topology, learning algorithm, training set, or unexpected changes in the environment.

    “Specific faults of a deep learning component can be caused by unreliable or noisy sensor signals (video signal due to bad weather, radar signal due to absorbing construction materials, GPS data, etc.), neural network topology, learning algorithm, training set or unexpected changes in the environment (e.g. unknown driving scenes or accidents on the road).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    There is still a gap to be filled between the accuracy of a simulated world and real-world driving.

    “There is still a gap to be filled between the accuracy of a simulated world and real-world driving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The effectiveness of deep learning systems is directly tied to the availability of training data.

    “The effectiveness of deep learning systems is directly tied to the availability of training data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The usage of deep learning in safety-critical systems is still an open debate.

    “The usage of deep learning in safetycritical systems is still an open debate, efforts being made to bring the computational intelligence and functional safety communities closer to each other.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Real-time requirements have to be fulfilled for processing large amounts of data from the car's sensors suite and for updating parameters of deep learning systems over high-speed communication lines.

    “Finally, realtime requirements have to be fulfilled for processing the large amounts of data gathered from the car's sensors suite, as well as for updating the parameters of deep learning systems over high-speed communication lines [170].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [170] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    There are still open issues on the explainability, stability, or classification robustness of deep neural networks.

    “Although new data-driven design methodologies have been proposed, there are still opened issues on the explainability, stability, or classification robustness of deep neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Most driving scenarios are considered solvable with classical methodologies.

    “Most driving scenarios are considered solvable with classical methodologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The better the quality of the data is, the higher the accuracy of the algorithm.

    “The better the quality of the data is, the higher the accuracy of the algorithm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21

    Deep learning systems rely on large training databases and require extensive computational hardware.

    “On top of this, deep learning systems rely on large training databases and require extensive computational hardware.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle poses challenges on the parallelization of the training procedure, as well as on the storage infrastructure.

    “This poses challenges on the parallelization of the training procedure, as well as on the storage infrastructure.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21

    Autonomous vehicle technology has seen rapid progress in the past decade, especially due to advances in AI and deep learning.

    “Autonomous vehicle technology has seen a rapid progress in the past decade, especially due to advances in the area of artificial intelligence and deep learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21

    A major challenge is the difficulty in proving the functional safety of autonomous vehicles, given the current formalism and explainability of neural networks.

    “A major challenge is the difficulty in proving the functional safety of these vehicle, given the current formalism and explainability of neural networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    These real-time constraints can be backed up by advances in semiconductor chips dedicated for self-driving cars, as well as by the rise of 5G communication networks.

    “These real-time constraints can be backed up by advances in semiconductor chips dedicated for self-driving cars, as well as by the rise of 5G communication networks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21

    Current AI methodologies are nowadays either used or taken into consideration when designing different components for a self-driving car.

    “Current AI methodologies are nowadays either used or taken into consideration when designing different components for a self-driving car.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Generalization in deep learning is of special importance in learning hazardous situations that can lead to accidents, especially because training data for such corner cases is scarce.

    “Generalization in deep learning is of special importance in learning hazardous situations that can lead to accidents, especially due to the fact that training data for such corner cases is scarce.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21

    Deep learning approaches have influenced the design of traditional perception-planning-action pipelines and enabled End2End learning systems that directly map sensory information to steering commands.

    “Deep learning approaches have influenced not only the design of traditional perception-planning-action pipelines, but have also enabled End2End learning systems, able do directly map sensory information to steering commands.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    Classical controllers make use of an a-priori model composed of fixed parameters.

    “Classical controllers make use of an a-priori model composed of fixed parameters.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20

    The remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases which, until now, required the reasoning and intelligence of a human driver.

    “However, the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases which, until now, required the reasoning and intelligence of a human driver.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
114 of 114
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most driving scenarios can be relatively simply solved with classical perception, path planning and motion control methods, and the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases in which traditional methods fail.

    “Although most driving scenarios can be relatively simply solved with classical perception, path planning and motion control methods, the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases in which traditional methods fail.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The deployment of AVs offers a decrease in road accidents and traffic congestions, as well as an improvement of mobility in overcrowded cities.

    “Their deployment in our environmental landscape offers a decrease in road accidents and traffic congestions, as well as an improvement of our mobility in overcrowded cities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In order to operate at high speeds, an autonomous vehicle requires a minimum of 200 m range.

    “In order to operate at high speeds, an autonomous vehicle requires a minimum of 200 m range, allowing the vehicle to react to changes in road conditions in time.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Systems trained solely on simulated data tend to learn a biased version of the driving environment.

    “Such systems, trained solely on simulated data, tend to learn a biased version of the driving environment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.

    “The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware components in a self-driving vehicle.

    “since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cameras lack depth perception and cannot work in the dark.

    “cameras are cost efficient, but lack depth perception and cannot work in the dark.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self-driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in deep learning and AI.

    “The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self-driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in the area of deep learning and artificial intelligence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deep Learning and AI have a major impact in the autonomous driving revolution seen today both in academia and industry.

    “They also have a major impact in the autonomous driving revolution seen today both in academia and industry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    AVs and self-driving cars began to migrate from laboratory development and testing conditions to driving on public roads.

    “Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and self-driving cars began to migrate from laboratory development and testing conditions to driving on public roads.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CNNs, RNNs and DRL are the most common deep learning methodologies applied to autonomous driving.

    “We focus on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), which are the most common deep learning methodologies applied to autonomous driving.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In autonomous driving applications, the observation space is mainly composed of sensory information made up of images, radar, LiDAR, etc.

    “In autonomous driving applications, the observation space is mainly composed of sensory information made up of images, radar, LiDAR, etc.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DQN has been developed to operate in discrete action spaces.

    “DQN has been developed to operate in discrete action spaces.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deep learning methods are particularly well suited for detecting and recognizing objects in 2D images and 3D point clouds acquired from video cameras and LiDAR devices.

    “Deep learning methods are particularly well suited for detecting and recognizing objects in 2D images and 3D point clouds acquired from video cameras and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) devices, respectively.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the autonomous driving community, 3D perception is mainly based on LiDAR sensors, which provide a direct 3D representation of the surrounding environment in the form of 3D point clouds.

    “In the autonomous driving community, 3D perception is mainly based on LiDAR sensors, which provide a direct 3D representation of the surrounding environment in the form of 3D point clouds.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    3D sensors, such as Velodyne, usually have a 360° horizontal field of view.

    “3D sensors, such as Velodyne ® , usually have a 360 ◦ horizontal field of view.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 3D object detection precision is dictated by the resolution of the sensor, with most advanced LiDARs being able to provide a 3 cm accuracy.

    “The 3D object detection precision is dictated by the resolution of the sensor, with most advanced LiDARs being able to provide a 3 cm accuracy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cameras are also sensitive to bad weather, if the weather conditions are obstructing the field of view.

    “Cameras are also sensitive to bad weather, if the weather conditions are obstructing the field of view.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Apart from these sensing technologies, radar and ultrasonic sensors are used to enhance perception capabilities.

    “Apart from these sensing technologies, radar and ultrasonic sensors are used to enhance perception capabilities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.

    “However, point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no commonly agreed definition for the term safety in the context of machine learning or deep learning.

    “There is no commonly agreed definition for the term safety in the context of machine learning or deep learning.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.

    “The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    NVIDIA is the market leader in providing hardware solutions for deploying deep learning algorithms inside autonomous cars.

    “The market leader in providing hardware solutions for deploying deep learning algorithms inside autonomous cars is NVIDIA ® .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Germany is the most active country for driving recording vehicles.

    “Germany is the most active country for driving recording vehicles.”
24 of 24

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of reliability will strengthen the engineering behind autonomous vehicles' openness and accountability.

    “The development of reliability will strengthen the engineering behind autonomous vehicles' openness and accountability [27], [89].”

    From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

    Section 7 (p. 16) says deep-learning techniques are becoming reliable for safety-critical systems but that safety assurance remains an open question and new standards are needed. Section 10 (p. 20) also identifies explainability as an unresolved issue. The paper does not say that developing reliability will strengthen autonomous-vehicle engineering’s openness or accountability. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Israelson and Ahmed have demonstrated that there exists a fundamental requirement for computational guarantee to foster interactions between human-autonomous systems.

    “Israelson and Ahmed have demonstrated that there exists a fundamental requirement for computational guarantee to foster interactions between human-autonomous systems.”

    From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Discussion and Conclusions (p. 20) discusses functional safety as an open challenge, and Final Notes (p. 21) describes the difficulty of proving autonomous-vehicle safety. Neither passage says that Israelson and Ahmed demonstrated a fundamental requirement for computational guarantees to foster human–autonomous-system interactions. Searches for their names and for that requirement found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The populace's adoption of autonomous vehicle technology would expand if the intended consumers' involvement, ideas, and expectations are sought out during the conception and creation of autonomous vehicles.

    “The populace's adoption of the aforementioned technology would expand if the intended consumers' involvement, ideas, and expectations are sought out during the conception and creation of autonomous vehicles [27], [89].”

    From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Introduction (p. 3) discusses autonomous-vehicle deployment, while the Final Notes (p. 21) discuss technical design and safety challenges. Neither addresses whether seeking intended consumers’ involvement, ideas, and expectations during development would increase public adoption; searches for consumer involvement and public acceptance found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Deep learning is a powerful tool for generating multimodal data suitable for robotics and autonomous systems.

    “Up to now, deep learning has proven to be a powerful tool for generating multimodal data suitable for robotics and autonomous systems [146].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Five SAE levels are said to run from 0 to 5

    Minor

    A scale numbered from 0 through 5 contains six levels, not five.

  • Oxford dataset has two different licenses

    Minor

    Table 2 lists a ShareAlike 3.0 license for Oxford, whereas the prose specifies a Noncommercial 4.0 license without ShareAlike.

  • Safety standard number changes from ISO 26262 to ISO26226

    Minor

    The safety discussion repeatedly identifies the standard as ISO 26262 but attributes its hazard definition to ISO26226.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Faria J. M., 2018, Machine Learning Safety: An Overview, Safety‐Critical Systems Club
  2. Flohr F. &Gavrila D. M.(2013). Daimler pedestrian segmentation benchmark dataset. InProceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference.
  3. Garcia‐Favrot O. &Parent M.(2009). Laser scanner based SLAM in real road and traffic environment. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA09). Workshop on Safe Navigation in Open and Dynamic Environments Application to Autonomous Vehicles.
  4. Harris M., 2016, Google reports self‐driving car mistakes: 272 Failures and 13 near misses, The Guardian
  5. Krizhevsky A., 2012, Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), 1097
  6. McPherson J., 2018, How Uber's self‐driving technology could have failed in the fatal tempe crash, Forbes
  7. Nguyen‐Tuong D., 2008, Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 1193
  8. O'Kane S., 2018, How Tesla and Waymo are tackling a major problem for self‐driving cars: Data, Transportation
  9. Pan Y., 2017, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems NIPS 2017
  10. Rawlings J., 2009, Model predictive control: Theory and design
  11. Rehder E. Quehl J. &Stiller C.(2017). Driving like a human: Imitation learning for path planning using convolutional neural networks. InInternational Conference on Robotics and Automation Workshops.
  12. Seeger C. Müller A. &Schwarz L.(2016). Towards road type classification with occupancy grids. InIntelligent Vehicles Symposium—Workshop: DeepDriving—Learning Representations for Intelligent Vehicles IEEE. Gothenburg Sweden.
  13. Ushani A. K., 2018, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 283

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G.
Affiliations
  • Transilvania University of Brașov (RO)
  • Artificial Intelligence, Elektrobit Automotive Robotics, Vision and Control Laboratory, Transilvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-14
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
362-386
ISSN
  • 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4967
OpenAlex
W2981207549
Cited by
1,809
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 207 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 337 · 2022: 288 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 1
FWCI
66.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Field Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, deep learning architectures, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, deep reinforcement learning, path planning, behavior arbitration, motion control, AI safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review