A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving
Open accessAbstract
The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self‐driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in the area of deep learning and artificial intelligence (AI). The objective of this paper is to survey the current state‐of‐the‐art on deep learning technologies used in autonomous driving. We start by presenting AI‐based self‐driving architectures, convolutional and recurrent neural networks, as well as the deep reinforcement learning paradigm. These methodologies form a base for the surveyed driving scene perception, path planning, behavior arbitration, and motion control algorithms. We investigate both the modular perception‐planning‐action pipeline, where each module is built using deep learning methods, as well as End2End systems, which directly map sensory information to steering commands. Additionally, we tackle current challenges encountered in designing AI architectures for autonomous driving, such as their safety, training data sources, and computational hardware. The comparison presented in this survey helps gain insight into the strengths and limitations of deep learning and AI approaches for autonomous driving and assist with design choices.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews deep learning and AI methods for autonomous driving, covering CNN/RNN/DRL foundations, modular and End2End architectures, perception, planning, control, safety, datasets, and hardware. It concludes that deep learning is central to self-driving development, but functional safety, corner-case data, and real-time deployment remain open challenges.
Key findings
- The paper surveys two main AI-based self-driving architectures: a modular perception-planning-action pipeline and End2End systems that directly map sensory information to steering commands; the modular pipeline is decomposed into perception/localization, high-level path planning, behavior arbitration, and motion controllers.
- End2End learning is exemplified by NVIDIA PilotNet, reported as having 250,000 parameters and approximately 27 million connections, reaching 98% autonomy on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands, NJ, USA, with an intervention defined as departing from the center line by more than one meter and assuming 6 seconds for a human to retake control.
- Public datasets vary widely in sensor setup, size, and license: KITTI provides 6 hours of driving data and more than 2000 citations; NuScenes contains 1000 driving scenes, 25 annotated object classes at 2 Hz, and is planned to include approximately 1.4 million camera images, 400,000 LiDAR sweeps, 1.3 million RADAR sweeps, and 1.1 million object bounding boxes in 40,000 keyframes; Cityscapes has 5000 finely annotated and 20000 coarsely annotated images; Oxford spans over 1000 km and almost 20 million images.
- Safety remains unresolved: ISO 26262 does not address the unique characteristics of deep-learning-based software, and the paper notes the first autonomous driving accident involving a Tesla vehicle after 130 million miles of testing, caused by object misclassification under rare “Black Swan” circumstances.
Methods
- Design: a narrative survey of deep learning and AI technologies for autonomous driving, including CNN, RNN/LSTM, and deep reinforcement learning, followed by application areas such as perception, localization, path planning, behavior arbitration, motion control, safety, data sources, and computational hardware.
- Data or sample: literature review and comparison of published methods, architectures, and publicly available driving datasets; no new empirical experiment or primary dataset is introduced.
- Main analysis: qualitative synthesis with comparative tables and figures, including object detection performance on Pascal VOC 2012, semantic segmentation performance on Cityscapes, a summary of End2End learning methods, and a summary of datasets for training autonomous driving systems.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: there is no master dataset combining available driving datasets, no standard requirements for data format and sensor setup, and available datasets cover only a very small portion of the world map, mostly under sunny, daylight, and urban conditions.
- Stated in the paper: safety assurance for deep learning in safety-critical systems is still an open question; current automotive standards such as ISO 26262 cannot be fully mapped to deep-learning systems; DRL models trained in simulation tend to be biased when ported to the real world, while imitation learning data is scarce on corner cases.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative survey, it does not report a systematic search or inclusion protocol, and its performance comparisons rely on cited results and figures/tables rather than independent benchmark experiments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 93 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14
The low-level features learned by PilotNet are similar to the ones that are relevant to a human driver.
“A method for finding the salient object regions in the input image is described, while reaching the conclusion that the low-level features learned by PilotNet are similar to the ones that are relevant to a human driver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] [112] M. Bojarski, P. Yeres, A. Choromanska, K. Choromanski, B. Firner, L. Jackel, and U. Muller, 'Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Car,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07911 , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14
An autonomy of 98% was reached on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands in NJ, USA.
“An autonomy of 98% was reached on a 20 km drive from Holmdel to Atlantic Highlands in NJ, USA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20
The largest portion of papers in deep learning for self-driving cars are focused mainly on perception and End2End learning.
“Currently, the largest portion of papers in deep learning for selfdriving cars are focused mainly on perception and End2End learning [81, 124].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [81] [81] S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Shammah, and A. Shashua, 'Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving,' 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [124] [124] T. Zhang, G. Kahn, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, 'Learning Deep Control Policies for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles with MPC-guided Policy Search,' 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , May 2016. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487175 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17
Despite extensive search, the authors have not found a master dataset that combines at least parts of the available ones.
“Despite our extensive search, we are yet to find a master dataset that combines at least parts of the ones available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5
A traditional RNN is not suitable for capturing long-term dependencies in sequence data.
“Hence, a traditional RNN is not suitable for capturing long-term dependencies in sequence data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7
A non-linear parametrization of Q* can be encoded in the layers of a deep neural network.
“Instead of the traditional approach, a non-linear parametrization of Q ∗ can be encoded in the layers of a deep neural network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ [4.2 Driving Scene Understanding](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8
The real-world 3D positions of detected objects have to be estimated because depth information is lost in the projection of the imaged scene onto the imaging sensor.
“However, the real-world 3D positions of the detected objects have to be estimated, since depth information is lost in the projection of the imaged scene onto the imaging sensor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15
A deep learning component can create new types of hazards.
“Nevertheless, a deep learning component can create new types of hazards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [132] [132] R. Parasuraman and V. Riley, 'Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse,' Human Factors , vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 230-253, 1997. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4.2.2 Semantic and Instance Segmentation · p. 9
AdapNet is capable of robust segmentation in various environments by adaptively learning features of expert networks based on scene conditions.
“The robustness objective for semantic segmentation was tackled for optimization in AdapNet [58]. The model is capable of robust segmentation in various environments by adaptively learning features of expert networks based on scene conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] [58] A. Valada, J. Vertens, A. Dhall, and W. Burgard, 'AdapNet: Adaptive Semantic Segmentation in Adverse Environmental Conditions,' 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 46444651, 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9
Combined camera-LiDAR architectures are used to overcome the fact that point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.
“In order to overcome this, combined camera-LiDAR architectures are used, such as Frustum PointNet [48], Multi-View 3D networks (MV3D) [49], or RoarNet [56].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [48] [48] C. R. Qi, W. Liu, C. Wu, H. Su, and L. J. Guibas, 'Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2018 , June 2018. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [49] [49] X. Chen, H. Ma, J. Wan, B. Li, and T. Xia, 'MultiView 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017 , July 2017. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [56] [56] K. Shin, Y. P. Kwon, and M. Tomizuka, 'RoarNet: A Robust 3D Object Detection based on RegiOn Approximation Refinement,' CoRR , vol. abs/1811.03818, 2018. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.
- Interpretationcitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7
A solution to the biased simulation problem is to use Imitation Learning methods, such as Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL), to learn from human driving demonstrations without needing to explore unsafe actions.
“A solution here is to use Imitation Learning methods, such as Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) [27], to learn from human driving demonstrations without needing to explore unsafe actions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] [27] M. Wulfmeier, D. Z. Wang, and I. Posner, 'Watch This: Scalable Cost-Function Learning for Path Planning in Urban Environments,' 2016 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , vol. abs/1607.02329, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.02329 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Systems trained solely on simulated data tend to learn a biased version of the driving environment.
- Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8
The advantage of Tesla resides in its large training database, consisting of more than 1 billion driven miles.
“The advantage of Tesla ® resides in its large training database, consisting of more than 1 billion driven miles 3 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] [3] Y. Goldberg, Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing , ser. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool, 2017, vol. 37. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14
Through training, PilotNet learns how the steering commands are computed by a human driver.
“Through training, PilotNet learns how the steering commands are computed by a human driver [112].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] [112] M. Bojarski, P. Yeres, A. Choromanska, K. Choromanski, B. Firner, L. Jackel, and U. Muller, 'Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Car,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07911 , 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14
The next trend in DRL based control seems to be the inclusion of classical model-based control techniques, where the classical controller provides a stable and deterministic model on top of which the policy of the neural network is estimated, transferring hard constraints of the modeled system into the neural network policy.
“The next trend in DRL based control seems to be the inclusion of classical model-based control techniques, as the ones detailed in Section 6.1. The classical controller provides a stable and deterministic model on top of which the policy of the neural network is estimated. In this way, the hard constraints of the modeled system are transfered into the neural network policy [124].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] [124] T. Zhang, G. Kahn, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, 'Learning Deep Control Policies for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles with MPC-guided Policy Search,' 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , May 2016. [Online]. Available: http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487175 -
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 6.1 Learning Controllers · p. 12
When robots or other autonomous systems are used in complex environments, such as driving, traditional controllers cannot foresee every possible situation that the system has to cope with.
“When robots or other autonomous systems are used in complex environments, such as driving, traditional controllers cannot foresee every possible situation that the system has to cope with.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7
The main challenge in DRL for autonomous driving is the training, since the agent has to explore its environment, usually through learning from collisions.
“The main challenge here is the training, since the agent has to explore its environment, usually through learning from collisions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 4.3 Perception using Occupancy Maps · p. 10
Deep learning plays an important role in the estimation of occupancy grids, since the information used to populate the grid cells is inferred from processing image and LiDAR data using scene perception methods.
“Deep learning plays an important role in the estimation of OG, since the information used to populate the grid cells is inferred from processing image and LiDAR data using scene perception methods, as the ones described in this chapter of the survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8
The pseudo-LiDAR data can be further fed to 3D deep learning processing methods, such as PointNet or AVOD.
“The pseudo-LiDAR data can be further fed to 3D deep learning processing methods, such as PointNet [33] or AVOD [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] [33] C. R. Qi, H. Su, K. Mo, and L. J. Guibas, 'PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017 , July 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] [34] J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh, and S. L. Waslander, 'Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation,' in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018 . IEEE, 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9
The main disadvantage in using a LiDAR in the sensory suite of a self-driving car is primarily its cost.
“The main disadvantage in using a LiDAR in the sensory suite of a self-driving car is primarily its cost 5 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] [5] E. Dickmanns and V. Graefe, 'Dynamic Monocular Machine Vision,' Machine vision and applications , vol. 1, pp. 223-240, 1988. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
Uncertainty caused by the instantiation of the test set can have large safety implications on individual test samples.
“This uncertainty caused by the instantiation of the test set can have large safety implications on individual test samples [136].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] [136] K. R. Varshney and H. Alemzadeh, 'On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Products,' Big data , vol. 5, 10 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
The training set plays a key role in the safety of the deep learning component.
“The training set plays a key role in the safety of the deep learning component.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
This assumption is violated in the case of a deep learning system, where a training set is used instead of a specification.
“This assumption is violated in the case of a deep learning system, where a training set is used instead of a specification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
Black Swan events caused by data not present in the training set may lead to fatalities in the commercial autonomous vehicle market.
“Effects of this considerations are visible in the commercial autonomous vehicle market, where Black Swan events caused by data not present in the training set may lead to fatalities [141].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] [141] J. McPherson, 'How Uber's Self-Driving Technology Could Have Failed In The Fatal Tempe Crash,' Forbes , 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
The operational risk may be much larger than the actual risk for small cardinality test sets, even if h is risk-optimal.
“The operational risk may be much larger than the actual risk for small cardinality test sets, even if h is risk-optimal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [136] [136] K. R. Varshney and H. Alemzadeh, 'On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Products,' Big data , vol. 5, 10 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15
The distribution of training samples may not always be drawn from the true underlying probability distribution of (X,Y).
“The distribution of the training samples ( x 1 , y 1 ) , ..., ( xm , ym ) is drawn from the true underlying probability distribution of ( X , Y ) , which may not always be the case.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15
Training on a dataset of different distribution can cause much harm through bias.
“This is one of the epistemic uncertainty that is relevant for safety because training on a dataset of different distribution can cause much harm through bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
Specific fault types and failures have been cataloged for neural networks.
“Specific fault types and failures have been cataloged for neural networks in [139], [140] and [141].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [139] [139] Z. Kurd, T. Kelly, and J. Austin, 'Developing Artificial Neural Networks for Safety Critical Systems,' Neural Computing and Applications , vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 11-19, Jan 2007. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [140] [140] M. Harris, 'Google Reports Self-driving Car Mistakes: 272 Failures and 13 Near Misses,' The Guardian , 2016. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [141] [141] J. McPherson, 'How Uber's Self-Driving Technology Could Have Failed In The Fatal Tempe Crash,' Forbes , 2018. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15
A deep learning component can fail in unique ways due to its complexity.
“Due to its complexity, a deep learning component can fail in unique ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [128] [128] D. Amodei, C. Olah, J. Steinhardt, P. F. Christiano, J. Schulman, and D. Man´ e, 'Concrete Problems in AI Safety,' CoRR , vol. abs/1606.06565, 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19
GPUs can consume up to ten times more power than FPGAs when processing algorithms with the same computation complexity.
“The studies presented by manufacturers like Microsoft and Xilinx show that GPUs can consume upon ten times more power than FPGAs when processing algorithms with the same computation complexity, demonstrating that FPGAs can be a much more suitable solution for deep learning applications in the automotive field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16
The training process is not a verification process since the trained model will be correct by construction with respect to the training set, up to the limits of the model and the learning algorithm.
“The training process is not a verification process since the trained model will be correct by construction with respect to the training set, up to the limits of the model and the learning algorithm [130].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15
The standard formulation of machine learning does not consider uncertainty relevant for safety.
“However, this standard formulation does not consider the issues related to the uncertainty that is relevant for safety.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20
Current safety standards, such as ISO 26262, do not accommodate machine learning software.
“Current safety standards, such as the ISO 26262, do not accommodate machine learning software [130].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20
In a complex case such as autonomous driving, classical controllers cannot anticipate all driving situations.
“In a complex case, such as autonomous driving, these controllers cannot anticipate all driving situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20
The effectiveness of deep learning components to adapt based on past experiences can be used to learn the parameters of the car's control system, better approximating the underlying true system model.
“The effectiveness of deep learning components to adapt based on past experiences can also be used to learn the parameters of the car's control system, thus better approximating the underlaying true system model [174, 94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [174] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] [94] C. J. Ostafew, A. P. Schoellig, and T. D. Barfoot, 'Robust Constrained Learning-Based NMPC Enabling Reliable Mobile Robot Path Tracking,' Int. Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 35, no. 13, pp. 1547-1563, 2016. -
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 90
- May combine two claims. 52
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone given§ 1 Introduction · p. 3The majority of the surveyed work is dated after 2005.
“since the majority of the surveyed work is dated after 2005.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11Although DRL systems are able to explore different driving situations within a simulated world, these models tend to have a biased behavior when ported to the real-world.
“On the other hand, although DRL systems are able to explore different driving situations within a simulated world, these models tend to have a biased behavior when ported to the real-world.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 14The evaluation of the Tesla Autopilot comparison framework revealed an accuracy of 90.4% in detecting differences between both systems and the control transfer of the car to a human driver.
“The evaluation revealed an accuracy of 90 . 4% in detecting differences between both systems and the control transfer of the car to a human driver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11Imitation Learning has the advantage that it can be trained with data collected from the real-world, but this data is scarce on corner cases, making the trained network's response uncertain when confronted with unseen data.
“IL has the advantage that it can be trained with data collected from the real-world. Nevertheless, this data is scarce on corner cases (e.g. driving off-lanes, vehicle crashes, etc.), making the trained network's response uncertain when confronted with unseen data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8Single stage detectors do not provide the same performances as double stage detectors, but are significantly faster.
“In general, single stage detectors do not provide the same performances as double stage detectors, but are significantly faster.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 4.2.3 Localization · p. 10VO techniques are still dominated by classical keypoints matching algorithms, combined with acceleration data provided by inertial sensors, mainly because keypoints detectors are computationally efficient and can be easily deployed on embedded devices.
“Although much progress has been reported in the area of deep learning based localization, VO techniques are still dominated by classical keypoints matching algorithms, combined with acceleration data provided by inertial sensors. This is mainly due to the fact that keypoints detectors are computational efficient and can be easily deployed on embedded devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 13PilotNet has 250,000 parameters and approximately 27 million connections.
“PilotNet has 250 . 000 parameters and approx. 27 mil . connections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16The sensors setup differs from vehicle to vehicle, depending on how the data is planned to be used.
“The sensors setup differs from vehicle to vehicle, depending on how the data is planned to be used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The authors have identified seven major areas that form open challenges in autonomous driving.
“We have identified seven major areas that form open challenges in the field of autonomous driving.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16Many driving datasets were made public and documented in recent years due to increasing research interest in autonomous vehicles.
“In the last years, mainly due to the large and increasing research interest in autonomous vehicles, many driving datasets were made public and documented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16Public driving datasets vary in size, sensor setup and data format.
“They vary in size, sensor setup and data format.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7Given the advancements in deep reinforcement learning, the direct application of the algorithm still needs a training pipeline in which one should simulate and model the desired self-driving car's behavior.
“Given the advancements in deep reinforcement learning, the direct application of the algorithm still needs a training pipeline in which one should simulate and model the desired self-driving car's behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7The model-based policy iteration algorithm was introduced based on the proof that the Bellman equation is a contraction mapping.
“The model-based policy iteration algorithm was introduced in [18], based on the proof that the Bellman equation is a contraction mapping [20] when written as an operator n :”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] [18] R. Sutton and A. Barto, Introduction to Reinforcement Learning . MIT Press, 1998. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [20] [20] C. Watkins and P. Dayan, 'Q-Learning,' Machine Learning , vol. 8, no. 3, p. 279292, 1992. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3The driving decisions in AI-powered autonomous cars are computed either in a modular perception-planning-action pipeline or in an End2End learning fashion, where sensory information is directly mapped to control outputs.
“The driving decisions are computed either in a modular perception-planning-action pipeline (Fig. 1(a)), or in an End2End learning fashion (Fig. 1(b)), where sensory information is directly mapped to control outputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3The components of the modular pipeline can be designed either based on AI and deep learning methodologies, or using classical non-learning approaches.
“The components of the modular pipeline can be designed either based on AI and deep learning methodologies, or using classical non-learning approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7The method in [24] describes a model-free actor-critic algorithm able to learn different continuous control tasks directly from raw pixel inputs.
“The method in [24] describes a model-free actor-critic algorithm able to learn different continuous control tasks directly from raw pixel inputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] [24] T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y. Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra, 'Continuous Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2-4 May 2016. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4In comparison to traditional handcrafted features, convolutional neural networks are able to automatically learn a representation of the feature space encoded in the training set.
“In comparison to these traditional handcrafted features, convolutional neural networks are able to automatically learn a representation of the feature space encoded in the training set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4A CNN mimics the functioning of the ventral flux, in which different areas of the brain are sensible to specific features in the visual field.
“A CNN mimics the functioning of the ventral flux, in which different areas of the brain are sensible to specific features in the visual field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7The standard reinforcement learning method described above is not feasible in high dimensional state spaces.
“However, the standard reinforcement learning method described above is not feasible in high dimensional state spaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5LSTMs solve the vanishing gradient problem by incorporating three gates, which control the input, output and memory state.
“As opposed to traditional recurrent neural networks, LSTMs solve the vanishing gradient problem by incorporating three gates, which control the input, output and memory state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] [17] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, 'Long Short-term Memory,' Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7Although continuous control with DRL is possible, the most common strategy for DRL in autonomous driving is based on discrete control.
“Although continuous control with DRL is possible, the most common strategy for DRL in autonomous driving is based on discrete control [26].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] [26] M. Jaritz, R. de Charette, M. Toromanoff, E. Perot, and F. Nashashibi, 'End-to-End Race Driving with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2018 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pp. 2070-2075, 2018. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are non-linear function approximators for estimating temporal dependencies in sequence data.
“Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) [17] networks are non-linear function approximators for estimating temporal dependencies in sequence data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] [17] S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, 'Long Short-term Memory,' Neural computation , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7DeepMind's combined algorithm, entitled Rainbow, was able to outperform the independently competing methods.
“A study on how to combine these improvements on deep reinforcement learning has been provided by DeepMind in [22], where the combined algorithm, entitled Rainbow , was able to outperform the independently competing methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3A safety monitor is designed to assure the safety of each module in the modular pipeline.
“A safety monitor is designed to assure the safety of each module.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4Convolutional Neural Networks are mainly used for processing spatial information, such as images, and can be viewed as image feature extractors and universal non-linear function approximators.
“Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) are mainly used for processing spatial information, such as images, and can be viewed as image features extractors and universal non-linear function approximators [7], [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] [7] Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, 'Gradient-based Learning Applied to Document Recognition,' Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2278-2324, Nov 1998. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] [8] Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent, 'Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives,' IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1798-1828, Aug 2013. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7All of the above complementary improvements have been tested on the Atari 2600 challenge.
“All of the above complementary improvements have been tested on the Atari 2600 challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7DeepMind proposes six extensions to the base DQN, each addressing a distinct concern.
“DeepMind [22] proposes six extensions to the base DQN, each addressing a distinct concern:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] [22] M. Hessel, J. Modayil, H. van Hasselt, T. Schaul, G. Ostrovski, W. Dabney, D. Horgan, B. Piot, M. Azar, and D. Silver, 'Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4Before the rise of deep learning, computer vision systems used to be implemented based on handcrafted features, such as HAAR, LBP, or HoG.
“Before the rise of deep learning, computer vision systems used to be implemented based on handcrafted features, such as HAAR [9], Local Binary Patterns (LBP) [10], or Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HoG) [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] [9] P. A. Viola and M. J. Jones, 'Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features,' in 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2001), with CDROM, 8-14 December 2001, Kauai, HI, USA , 2001, pp. 511-518. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] [10] T. Ojala, M. Pietik¨ ainen, and D. Harwood, 'A Comparative Study of Texture Measures with Classification Based on Featured Distributions,' Pattern Recognition , vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 51-59, Jan. 1996. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11] [11] N. Dalal and B. Triggs, 'Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection,' in In CVPR , 2005, pp. 886-893. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5When compared to a conventional neural network, the only difference is that the learned weights in each unfolded copy of the RNN are averaged, thus enabling the network to share the same weights over time.
“When compared to a conventional neural network, the only difference is that the learned weights in each unfolded copy of the network are averaged, thus enabling the network to shared the same weights over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1 Introduction · p. 3The turning point in self-driving car development acknowledged Machine Learning and AI as central components of autonomous driving.
“This was a turning point in selfdriving cars development, acknowledging Machine Learning and AI as central components of autonomous driving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 5The Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) is the most commonly used activation function in computer vision applications.
“Typically, the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) is the most commonly used activation function in computer vision applications [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] [1] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7A model-based solution for continuous Q-learning is proposed in [25].
“A model-based solution for continuous Qlearning is proposed in [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] [25] S. Gu, T. Lillicrap, I. Sutskever, and S. Levine, 'Continuous Deep Q-Learning with Model-based Acceleration,' in Int. Conf. on Machine Learning ICML 2016 , vol. 48, Jun. 2016, pp. 2829-2838. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7In literature, such a non-linear approximator is called a Deep Q-Network (DQN) and is used for estimating the approximate action-value function.
“In literature, such a non-linear approximator is called a Deep QNetwork (DQN) [21] and is used for estimating the approximate action-value function:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] [21] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, 'Human-level Control Through Deep Reinforcement Learning,' Nature , vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, Feb. 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7The deep reinforcement learning community has made several independent improvements to the original DQN algorithm.
“The deep reinforcement learning community has made several independent improvements to the original DQN algorithm [21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] [21] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, S. Petersen, C. Beattie, A. Sadik, I. Antonoglou, H. King, D. Kumaran, D. Wierstra, S. Legg, and D. Hassabis, 'Human-level Control Through Deep Reinforcement Learning,' Nature , vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, Feb. 2015. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4The visual information is processed according to the dual flux theory, which states that the visual flow follows two main fluxes: a ventral flux responsible for visual identification and object recognition, and a dorsal flux used for establishing spatial relations between objects.
“The information is processed according to the dual flux theory [13], which states that the visual flow follows two main fluxes: a ventral flux , responsible for visual identification and object recognition, and a dorsal flux used for establishing spatial relations between objects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] [13] M. A. Goodale and A. Milner, 'Separate Visual Pathways for Perception and Action,' Trends in Neurosciences , vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20 - 25, 1992. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7In order to decode the true environment state, it is not sufficient to map a single snapshot of sensors readings; the temporal information should also be included in the network's input, since the environment's state is modified over time.
“In order to decode the true environment state, it is not sufficient to map a single snapshot of sensors readings. The temporal information should also be included in the network's input, since the environment's state is modified over time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.1 Deep Convolutional Neural Networks · p. 4CNNs can be loosely understood as very approximate analogies to different parts of the mammalian visual cortex.
“CNNs can be loosely understood as very approximate analogies to different parts of the mammalian visual cortex [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] [12] D. H. Hubel and T. N.Wiesel, 'Shape and Arrangement of Columns in Cats Striate Cortex,' The Journal of Physiology , vol. 165, no. 3, p. 559568, 1963. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 6The optimal action-value function Q* satisfies the Bellman optimality equation.
“The optimal action-value function Q ∗ satisfies the Bellman optimality equation [19], which is a recursive formulation of Eq. 10:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] [19] R. Bellman, Dynamic Programming . Princeton University Press, 1957. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 3.2 Recurrent Neural Networks · p. 5The main challenge in using basic RNNs is the vanishing gradient encountered during training.
“The main challenge in using basic RNNs is the vanishing gradient encountered during training.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7The DQN approach has been extended to continuous action spaces based on policy gradient estimation.
“The DQN approach described above has been extended to continuous action spaces based on policy gradient estimation [24].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] [24] T. P. Lillicrap, J. J. Hunt, A. Pritzel, N. Heess, T. Erez, Y. Tassa, D. Silver, and D. Wierstra, 'Continuous Control with Deep Reinforcement Learning,' 2-4 May 2016. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 3.3 Deep Reinforcement Learning · p. 7In the case of an autonomous car, the discrete actions would translate to discrete commands, such as turn left, turn right, accelerate, or break.
“In the case of an autonomous car, the discrete actions would translate to discrete commands, such as turn left, turn right, accelerate, or break.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 2 Deep Learning based Decision-Making Architectures for Self-Driving Cars · p. 3Various permutations of learning and non-learning based components are possible in the modular pipeline.
“Various permutations of learning and non-learning based components are possible (e.g. a deep learning based object detector provides input to a classical A-star path planning algorithm).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1 Introduction · p. 3Deep Learning and AI became the main technologies behind many breakthroughs in computer vision, robotics and NLP over the last decade.
“Over the course of the last decade, Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) became the main technologies behind many breakthroughs in computer vision [1], robotics [2] and Natural Language Processing (NLP) [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] [1] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, and K. Q. Weinberger, Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] [2] M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba, 'Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation,' CoRR , vol. abs/1808.00177, August 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00177 - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3] [3] Y. Goldberg, Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing , ser. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Morgan & Claypool, 2017, vol. 37. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8The success of image based 3D estimation is of high importance to the large scale deployment of autonomous cars, since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.
“The success of image based 3D estimation is of high importance to the large scale deployment of autonomous cars, since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware components in a self-driving vehicle.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8Researchers at Cornell University tried to replicate LiDAR-like point clouds from visual depth estimation.
“Researchers at Cornell University tried to replicate LiDAR-like point clouds from visual depth estimation [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] [32] Y. Wang, W.-L. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, and K. Weinberger, 'Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019 , June 2019. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9AVOD leverages LiDAR data only for training, while images are used during training and deployment, and at deployment stage, AVOD is able to predict 3D bounding boxes of objects solely from image data.
“A solution here would be to use neural network architectures such as AVOD (Aggregate View Object Detection) [34], which leverage on LiDAR data only for training, while images are used during training and deployment. At deployment stage, AVODisable to predict 3D bounding boxes of objects solely from image data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] [34] J. Ku, M. Mozifian, J. Lee, A. Harakeh, and S. L. Waslander, 'Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation,' in IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018 . IEEE, 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 6.2 End2End Learning Control · p. 13End2End methods have been popularized in the last couple of years by NVIDIA, as part of the PilotNet architecture; the approach is to train a CNN which maps raw pixels from a single front-facing camera directly to steering commands.
“End2End methods have been popularized in the last couple of years by NVIDIA ® , as part of the PilotNet architecture. The approach is to train a CNN which maps raw pixels from a single front-facing camera directly to steering commands [119].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] [119] M. Bojarski, D. D. Testa, D. Dworakowski, B. Firner, B. Flepp, P. Goyal, L. D. Jackel, M. Monfort, U. Muller, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Zhao, and K. Zieba, 'End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars,' CoRR , vol. abs/1604.07316, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316 -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8Tesla and Waymo, two of the companies leading the development of self-driving technology, have different philosophies with respect to their main perception sensor, as well as regarding the targeted SAE level.
“Tesla ® and Waymo ® , two of the companies leading the development of self-driving technology [30], have different philosophies with respect to their main perception sensor, as well as regarding the targeted SAE level [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [30] [30] S. O'Kane, 'How Tesla and Waymo are Tackling a Major Problem for Self-Driving Cars: Data,' Transportation , 2018. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15ISO 26262 provides comprehensive requirements for assuring safety but does not address the unique characteristics of deep learning-based software.
“The ISO 26262 standard for functional safety of road vehicles provides a comprehensive set of requirements for assuring safety, but does not address the unique characteristics of deep learning-based software.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ [4.2.1 Bounding-Box-Like Object Detectors](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 9Detectors such as SqueezeNet or [55] are optimized to run on embedded hardware, have a smaller neural network architecture, making it possible to detect objects using a reduced number of operations, at the cost of detection accuracy.
“If in-vehicle computation resources are scarce, one can use detectors such as SqueezeNet [40] or [55], which are optimized to run on embedded hardware. These detectors usually have a smaller neural network architecture, making it possible to detect objects using a reduced number of operations, at the cost of detection accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [40] [40] F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, 'Squeezenet: Alexnetlevel Accuracy with 50x Fewer Parameters and¡ 0.5 Mb Model Size,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360 , 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] [55] J. Li, K. Peng, and C.-C. Chang, 'An Efficient Object Detection Algorithm Based on Compressed Networks,' Symmetry , vol. 10, no. 7, p. 235, 2018. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8Waymo makes use of three Lidar sensors, five radars and eight cameras, while Tesla cars are equipped with eight cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors and one forward-facing radar.
“For example, alongside three Lidar sensors, Waymo also makes use of five radars and eight cameras, while Tesla ® cars are equipped with eights cameras, 12 ultrasonic sensors and one forward-facing radar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8LiDARs have high resolution and precise perception even in the dark, but are vulnerable to bad weather conditions (e.g. heavy rain) and involve moving parts.
“LiDARs have high resolution and precise perception even in the dark, but are vulnerable to bad weather conditions (e.g. heavy rain) [31] and involve moving parts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] [31] S. Hasirlioglu, A. Kamann, I. Doric, and T. Brandmeier, 'Test Methodology for Rain Influence on Automotive Surround Sensors,' in 2016 IEEE 19th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , Nov 2016, pp. 2242-2247. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15The use of deep learning components in safety critical systems is still an open question.
“Regardless of the above empirical definitions and possible interpretations of safety, the use of deep learning components in safety critical systems is still an open question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 6.1 Learning Controllers · p. 12With every gathered batch of training data, the approximation of the true system model becomes more accurate, thus enabling model flexibility, consistent uncertainty estimates and anticipation of repeatable effects and disturbances that cannot be modeled prior to deployment.
“With every gathered batch of training data, the approximation of the true system model becomes more accurate, thus enabling model flexibility, consistent uncertainty estimates and anticipation of repeatable effects and disturbances that cannot be modeled prior to deployment [91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] [91] C. J. Ostafew, J. Collier, A. P. Schoellig, and T. D. Barfoot, 'Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control to Improve Vision-based Mobile Robot Path Tracking,' Journal of Field Robotics , vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 133-152, 2015. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8The main sensing technologies differ in both companies: Tesla tries to leverage on its camera systems, whereas Waymo's driving technology relies more on Lidar sensors.
“The main sensing technologies differ in both companies. Tesla ® tries to leverage on its camera systems, whereas Waymo's driving technology relies more on Lidar sensors 4 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] [4] SAE Committee, 'Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems,' 2014. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15[130] addresses the gap by analyzing where machine learning can impact ISO 26262 and provides recommendations on how to accommodate this impact.
“[130] addresses this gap by analyzing the places where machine learning can impact the standard and provides recommendations on how to accommodate this impact.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [130] [130] R. Salay, R. Queiroz, and K. Czarnecki, 'An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Software,' CoRR , vol. abs/1709.02435, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1709. 02435 -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 4.3 Perception using Occupancy Maps · p. 10Occupancy maps represent an in-vehicle virtual environment, integrating perceptual information in a form better suited for path planning and motion control.
“Occupancy maps represent an in-vehicle virtual environment, integrating perceptual information in a form better suited for path planning and motion control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 14Demonstrating the safety of a system which is running deep learning techniques depends heavily on the type of technique and the application context.
“Demonstrating the safety of a system which is running deep learning techniques depends heavily on the type of technique and the application context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ [4.2 Driving Scene Understanding](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8Image data is more suited for the object recognition task because it is richer in information.
“Being richer in information, image data is more suited for the object recognition task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.2.2 Semantic and Instance Segmentation · p. 9In [44] and [57], the authors proposed approaches to speed up data processing and inference on embedded devices for autonomous driving; both architectures are light networks providing similar results as SegNet, with reduced computation cost.
“In [44] and [57], the authors proposed approaches to speed up data processing and inference on embedded devices for autonomous driving. Both architectures are light networks providing similar results as SegNet, with a reduced computation cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [44] [44] M. Treml, J. A. Arjona-Medina, T. Unterthiner, R. Durgesh, F. Friedmann, P. Schuberth, A. Mayr, M. Heusel, M. Hofmarcher, M. Widrich, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, 'Speeding up Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous Driving,' 2016. -
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [57] [57] A. Paszke, A. Chaurasia, S. Kim, and E. Culurciello, 'Enet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-time Semantic Segmentation,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02147 , 2016. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4.1 Sensing Hardware: Camera vs. LiDAR Debate · p. 8Waymo is building their vehicles directly as Level 5 systems, with currently more than 10 million miles driven autonomously.
“Waymo ® is building their vehicles directly as Level 5 systems, with currently more than 10 million miles driven autonomously 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] [2] M. Andrychowicz, B. Baker, M. Chociej, R. Jozefowicz, B. McGrew, J. Pachocki, A. Petron, M. Plappert, G. Powell, A. Ray, J. Schneider, S. Sidor, J. Tobin, P. Welinder, L. Weng, and W. Zaremba, 'Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation,' CoRR , vol. abs/1808.00177, August 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00177 -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 6.1 Learning Controllers · p. 12A major advantage of learning controllers is that they optimally combine traditional model-based control theory with learning algorithms, making it possible to still use established methodologies for controller design and stability analysis, together with a robust learning component applied at system identification and prediction levels.
“A major advantage of learning controllers is that they optimally combine traditional model-based control theory with learning algorithms. This makes it possible to still use established methodologies for controller design and stability analysis, together with a robust learning component applied at system identification and prediction levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ [4.2 Driving Scene Understanding](https://www.theverge.com/transportation/2018/4/19/17204044/tesla-waymo-self-driving-car-data-simulation) · p. 8Deep learning based perception, in particular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), became the de-facto standard in object detection and recognition, obtaining remarkable results in competitions such as the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge.
“Deep learning based perception, in particular Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), became the de-facto standard in object detection and recognition, obtaining remarkable results in competitions such as the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge [35].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] [35] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, A. C. Berg, and L. FeiFei, 'ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge,' Int. Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) , vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211-252, 2015. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 5 Deep Learning for Path Planning and Behavior Arbitration · p. 11The survey in [82] does not include a review on deep learning technologies, although the state of the art literature has revealed an increased interest in using deep learning technologies for path planning and behavior arbitration.
“However, [82] does not include a review on deep learning technologies, although the state of the art literature has revealed an increased interest in using deep learning technologies for path planning and behavior arbitration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] [82] S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang, 'Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles,' Machines , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17The Oxford dataset collection spanned over 1 year, resulting in over 1000 km of recorded driving with almost 20 million images from 6 cameras, along with LIDAR, GPS and INS ground truth.
“Provided by Oxford University, UK, the dataset collection spanned over 1 year, resulting in over 1000 km of recorded driving with almost 20 million images collected from 6 cameras mounted to the vehicle, along with LIDAR, GPS and INS ground truth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [153] [153] W. Maddern, G. Pascoe, C. Linegar, and P. Newman, '1 Year, 1000km: The Oxford RobotCar Dataset,' The Int. Journal of Robotics Research (IJRR) , vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3-15, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 20FPGAs provide a significant advantage over GPUs in developing driver assistance systems because FPGAs are designed to meet safety requirements while GPUs were originally built for graphics and high-performance computing where functional safety is not necessary.
“When compared to GPUs, which were originally built for graphics and high-performance computing systems, where functional safety is not necessary, FPGAs provide a significant advantage in developing driver assistance systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17The final NuScenes dataset will include approximately 1.4 million camera images, 400,000 Lidar sweeps, 1.3 million RADAR sweeps and 1.1 million object bounding boxes in 40,000 keyframes.
“The final dataset will include approximately 1,4 million camera images, 400.000 Lidar sweeps, 1,3 million RADAR sweeps and 1,1 million object bounding boxes in 40.000 keyframes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] [146] H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom, 'nuScenes: A multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11027 , 2019. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19The main limitations for vehicles are price, performance issues and power consumption.
“The main limitations when it comes to vehicles are the price, performance issues and power consumption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15The probability distribution is usually unknown, precluding the use of domain adaptation techniques.
“Usually the probability distribution is unknown, precluding the use of domain adaptation techniques [134] [135].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [134] [134] H. Daum´ e, III and D. Marcu, 'Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers,' J. Artif. Int. Res. , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 101-126, May 2006. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [135] [135] R. Caruana, Y. Lou, J. Gehrke, P. Koch, M. Sturm, and N. Elhadad, 'Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30day Readmission,' in Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2015, pp. 1721-1730. - source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16Machine learning and deep learning techniques are starting to become effective and reliable even for safety critical systems, though complete safety assurance remains an open question.
“Machine learning and deep learning techniques are starting to become effective and reliable even for safety critical systems, even if the complete safety assurance for this type of systems is still an open question.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19FPGAs show great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.
“AField-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is another viable solution, showing great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Additional work is required for bridging the gap between image- and LiDAR-based 3D perception.
“Furthermore, additional work is required for bridging the gap between image- and LiDAR-based 3D perception [32], enabling the computer vision community to close the current debate on camera vs. LiDAR as main perception sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] [32] Y. Wang, W.-L. Chao, D. Garg, B. Hariharan, M. Campbell, and K. Weinberger, 'Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Driving,' in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019 , June 2019. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16The high amount of data needed in the development stage made data collection on public roads a valuable activity.
“The high amount of data needed in the development stage of such components made data collection on public roads a valuable activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 19The majority of available datasets consider sunny, daylight and urban conditions, which are ideal operating conditions for autonomous driving systems.
“The majority of the available datasets consider sunny, daylight and urban conditions, these being ideal operating conditions for autonomous driving systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19NVIDIA DRIVE AGX developer kit platform was presented as the world's most advanced self-driving car platform, based on Volta technology.
“Introduced in September 2018, NVIDIA ® DRIVE AGX developer kit platform was presented as the world's most advanced self-driving car platform [166], being based on the Volta technology [167].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [166] [166] --, 'NVIDIA Drive AGX,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/self-drivingcars/drive-platform/hardware/. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [167] [167] --, 'NVIDIA Volta,' https://www.nvidia.com/enus/data-center/volta-gpu-architecture/. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19Deploying deep learning algorithms on target edge devices is not a trivial task.
“Deploying deep learning algorithms on target edge devices is not a trivial task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19DRIVE AGX Xavier is an energy-efficient computing platform with 30 trillion operations per second, meeting ISO 26262 functional safety specification.
“DRIVE AGX Xavier is a scalable open platform that can serve as an AI brain for self driving vehicles, and is an energy-efficient computing platform, with 30 trillion operations per second, while meeting automotive standards like the ISO 26262 functional safety specification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17NuScenes contains 1000 driving scenes collected from Boston and Singapore, with 25 object classes annotated with 3D bounding boxes at 2Hz.
“Constructed by nuTonomy, this dataset contains 1000 driving scenes collected from Boston and Singapore, two known for their dense traffic and highly challenging driving situations. In order to facilitate common computer vision tasks, such as object detection and tracking, the providers annotated 25 object classes with accurate 3D bounding boxes at 2Hz over the entire dataset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] [146] H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom, 'nuScenes: A multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.11027 , 2019. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19NVIDIA DRIVE PX is an AI car computer designed to enable auto-makers to focus directly on software for autonomous vehicles.
“DRIVE PX [162] is an AI car computer which was designed to enable the auto-makers to focus directly on the software for autonomous vehicles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [162] [162] NVIDIA, 'NVIDIA AI Car Computer Drive PX,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-au/self-drivingcars/drive-px/. - [169] --, 'R-Car H3,' https://www.renesas.com/sg/en/solutions/automotive/soc/rcar-h3.html/. - [170] E. Nurvitadhi, G. Venkatesh, J. Sim, D. Marr, R. Huang, J. Ong Gee Hock, Y. T. Liew, K. Srivatsan, D. Moss, S. Subhaschandra, and G. Boudoukh, 'Can FPGAs Beat GPUs in Accelerating Next-Generation Deep Neural Networks?' in Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA Int. Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays , ser. FPGA '17. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017, pp. 5-14. [Online]. Available: http://do source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17The study in [120] involved 99 participants, 29 vehicles, 405,807 miles and approximately 5.5 billion video frames.
“The study involved 99 participants, 29 vehicles, 405 , 807 miles and approximatively 5 . 5 billion video frames.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 16The usage of real world data is a key requirement for training and testing an autonomous driving component.
“Undeniably, the usage of real world data is a key requirement for training and testing an autonomous driving component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Deep learning is the main technology behind a large number of perception systems.
“Deep learning is the main technology behind a large number of perception systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17Each dataset heavily depends on the objective of the algorithm for which the data was collected.
“Each dataset heavily depends on the objective of the algorithm for which the data was collected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Long-term reasoning is solved, as provided by navigation systems, which are standard methods for selecting a route through the road network.
“We consider long-term reasoning as solved, as provided by navigation systems. These are standard methods for selecting a route through the road network, from the car's current position to destination [82].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] [82] S. D. Pendleton, H. Andersen, X. Du, X. Shen, M. Meghjani, Y. H. Eng, D. Rus, and M. H. Ang, 'Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles,' Machines , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, 2017. -
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 15Hazards unique to deep reinforcement learning components can be traced to faults and fit within existing ISO 26262 guidelines.
“Although hazards such as these may be unique to deep reinforcement learning components, they can be traced to faults, thus fitting within the existing guidelines of ISO 26262.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Current perception systems are mainly designed to calculate 2D or 3D bounding boxes for a couple of trained object classes, or to provide a segmented image of the driving environment.
“Although great progress has been reported with respect to accuracy in object detection and recognition [173], current systems are mainly designed to calculate 2D or 3D bounding boxes for a couple of trained object classes, or to provide a segmented image of the driving environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16ISO 26262 states that component behavior shall be fully specified and each refinement shall be verified with respect to its specification.
“ISO 26262 standard states that the component behavior shall be fully specified and each refinement shall be verified with respect to its specification.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16Despite 130 million miles of testing, the Tesla accident was caused under extremely rare circumstances (Black Swans) due to truck height, white color under bright sky, and vehicle positioning.
“Despite the 130 million miles of testing and evaluation, the accident was caused under extremely rare circumstances, also known as Black Swans, given the height of the truck, its white color under bright sky, combined with the positioning of the vehicle across the road.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] [137] S. Levin, 'Tesla Fatal Crash: 'Autopilot' Mode Sped up Car Before Driver Killed, Report Finds,' The Guardian , 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16Current standards and regulation from the automotive industry cannot be fully mapped to deep learning systems, requiring new safety standards targeted for deep learning.
“Current standards and regulation from the automotive industry cannot be fully mapped to such systems, requiring the development of new safety standards targeted for deep learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19NVIDIA DRIVE PX is capable of real-time environment perception, path planning and localization, combining deep learning, sensor fusion and surround vision.
“NVIDIA ® DRIVE PX is capable to perform real-time environment perception, path planning and localization. It combines deep learning, sensor fusion and surround vision to improve the driving experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19The newest version of DrivePX architecture is based on two Tegra X2 systems on a chip, each containing two Denver cores, 4 ARM A57 cores and a Pascal-generation GPU.
“The newest version of DrivePX architecture is based on two Tegra X2 [163] systems on a chip (SoCs). Each SoC contains two Denve [164] cores, 4 ARM A57 cores and a graphical computeing unit (GPU) from the Pascal [165] generation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [163] [163] --, 'Tegra X2,' https://devblogs.nvidia.com/jetson-tx2-deliverstwice-intelligence-edge/. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [164] [164] --, 'Denver Core,' https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/nvidia/microarchitectures/denver. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [165] [165] --, 'Pascal Microarchitecture,' https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/data-center/pascalgpu-architecture/. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17The data collected in the study in [120] is not available for the public.
“Unfortunately, the data collected in this study is not available for the public.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] [120] L. Fridman, D. E. Brown, M. Glazer, W. Angell, S. Dodd, B. Jenik, J. Terwilliger, J. Kindelsberger, L. Ding, S. Seaman, H. Abraham, A. Mehler, A. Sipperley, A. Pettinato, L. Angell, B. Mehler, and B. Reimer, 'MIT Autonomous Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Deep Learning Based Analysis of Driver Behavior and Interaction with Automation,' IEEE Access 2017 , 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06976 -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16Faults and failures of a programmed component are totally different from those of a deep learning component.
“Faults and failures of a programmed component (e.g. one using a formal algorithm to solve a problem) are totally different from the ones of a deep learning component.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16The first autonomous driving accident was produced by a Tesla car, where object misclassification errors caused AutoPilot to collide with a truck.
“We must mention the first autonomous driving accident, produced by a Tesla ® car, where, due to object misclassification errors, the AutoPilot function collided the vehicle into a truck [137].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] [137] S. Levin, 'Tesla Fatal Crash: 'Autopilot' Mode Sped up Car Before Driver Killed, Report Finds,' The Guardian , 2018. -
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 9 Computational Hardware and Deployment · p. 19Embedded platforms are becoming essential for integration of AI algorithms inside vehicles due to their portability, versatility, and energy efficiency.
“Therefore, embedded platforms are becoming essential for integration of AI algorithms inside vehicles due to their portability, versatility, and energy efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 8 Data Sources for Training Autonomous Driving Systems · p. 17KITTI is known as the most prestigious dataset in the self-driving vehicles domain and counts more than 2000 citations.
“It is known as the most prestigious dataset in the self-driving vehicles domain. To this date it counts more than 2000 citations in the literature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] [151] A. Geiger, P. Lenz, C. Stiller, and R. Urtasun, 'Vision Meets Robotics: The KITTI Dataset,' The Int. Journal of Robotics Research , vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 12311237, 2013. - source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 7 Safety of Deep Learning in Autonomous Driving · p. 16Specific faults of a deep learning component can be caused by unreliable or noisy sensor signals, neural network topology, learning algorithm, training set, or unexpected changes in the environment.
“Specific faults of a deep learning component can be caused by unreliable or noisy sensor signals (video signal due to bad weather, radar signal due to absorbing construction materials, GPS data, etc.), neural network topology, learning algorithm, training set or unexpected changes in the environment (e.g. unknown driving scenes or accidents on the road).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20There is still a gap to be filled between the accuracy of a simulated world and real-world driving.
“There is still a gap to be filled between the accuracy of a simulated world and real-world driving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The effectiveness of deep learning systems is directly tied to the availability of training data.
“The effectiveness of deep learning systems is directly tied to the availability of training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The usage of deep learning in safety-critical systems is still an open debate.
“The usage of deep learning in safetycritical systems is still an open debate, efforts being made to bring the computational intelligence and functional safety communities closer to each other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Real-time requirements have to be fulfilled for processing large amounts of data from the car's sensors suite and for updating parameters of deep learning systems over high-speed communication lines.
“Finally, realtime requirements have to be fulfilled for processing the large amounts of data gathered from the car's sensors suite, as well as for updating the parameters of deep learning systems over high-speed communication lines [170].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20There are still open issues on the explainability, stability, or classification robustness of deep neural networks.
“Although new data-driven design methodologies have been proposed, there are still opened issues on the explainability, stability, or classification robustness of deep neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Most driving scenarios are considered solvable with classical methodologies.
“Most driving scenarios are considered solvable with classical methodologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The better the quality of the data is, the higher the accuracy of the algorithm.
“The better the quality of the data is, the higher the accuracy of the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21Deep learning systems rely on large training databases and require extensive computational hardware.
“On top of this, deep learning systems rely on large training databases and require extensive computational hardware.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle poses challenges on the parallelization of the training procedure, as well as on the storage infrastructure.
“This poses challenges on the parallelization of the training procedure, as well as on the storage infrastructure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21Autonomous vehicle technology has seen rapid progress in the past decade, especially due to advances in AI and deep learning.
“Autonomous vehicle technology has seen a rapid progress in the past decade, especially due to advances in the area of artificial intelligence and deep learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21A major challenge is the difficulty in proving the functional safety of autonomous vehicles, given the current formalism and explainability of neural networks.
“A major challenge is the difficulty in proving the functional safety of these vehicle, given the current formalism and explainability of neural networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20These real-time constraints can be backed up by advances in semiconductor chips dedicated for self-driving cars, as well as by the rise of 5G communication networks.
“These real-time constraints can be backed up by advances in semiconductor chips dedicated for self-driving cars, as well as by the rise of 5G communication networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21Current AI methodologies are nowadays either used or taken into consideration when designing different components for a self-driving car.
“Current AI methodologies are nowadays either used or taken into consideration when designing different components for a self-driving car.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Generalization in deep learning is of special importance in learning hazardous situations that can lead to accidents, especially because training data for such corner cases is scarce.
“Generalization in deep learning is of special importance in learning hazardous situations that can lead to accidents, especially due to the fact that training data for such corner cases is scarce.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 10.1 Final Notes · p. 21Deep learning approaches have influenced the design of traditional perception-planning-action pipelines and enabled End2End learning systems that directly map sensory information to steering commands.
“Deep learning approaches have influenced not only the design of traditional perception-planning-action pipelines, but have also enabled End2End learning systems, able do directly map sensory information to steering commands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20Classical controllers make use of an a-priori model composed of fixed parameters.
“Classical controllers make use of an a-priori model composed of fixed parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 10 Discussion and Conclusions · p. 20The remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases which, until now, required the reasoning and intelligence of a human driver.
“However, the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases which, until now, required the reasoning and intelligence of a human driver.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Most driving scenarios can be relatively simply solved with classical perception, path planning and motion control methods, and the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases in which traditional methods fail.
“Although most driving scenarios can be relatively simply solved with classical perception, path planning and motion control methods, the remaining unsolved scenarios are corner cases in which traditional methods fail.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The deployment of AVs offers a decrease in road accidents and traffic congestions, as well as an improvement of mobility in overcrowded cities.
“Their deployment in our environmental landscape offers a decrease in road accidents and traffic congestions, as well as an improvement of our mobility in overcrowded cities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In order to operate at high speeds, an autonomous vehicle requires a minimum of 200 m range.
“In order to operate at high speeds, an autonomous vehicle requires a minimum of 200 m range, allowing the vehicle to react to changes in road conditions in time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Systems trained solely on simulated data tend to learn a biased version of the driving environment.
“Such systems, trained solely on simulated data, tend to learn a biased version of the driving environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.
“The simulated environment state is not directly accessible to the agent.”
The paper relies on this without support.
LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware components in a self-driving vehicle.
“since the LiDAR is arguably one of the most expensive hardware component in a self-driving vehicle.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cameras lack depth perception and cannot work in the dark.
“cameras are cost efficient, but lack depth perception and cannot work in the dark.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self-driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in deep learning and AI.
“The last decade witnessed increasingly rapid progress in self-driving vehicle technology, mainly backed up by advances in the area of deep learning and artificial intelligence.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep Learning and AI have a major impact in the autonomous driving revolution seen today both in academia and industry.
“They also have a major impact in the autonomous driving revolution seen today both in academia and industry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AVs and self-driving cars began to migrate from laboratory development and testing conditions to driving on public roads.
“Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) and self-driving cars began to migrate from laboratory development and testing conditions to driving on public roads.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CNNs, RNNs and DRL are the most common deep learning methodologies applied to autonomous driving.
“We focus on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), which are the most common deep learning methodologies applied to autonomous driving.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In autonomous driving applications, the observation space is mainly composed of sensory information made up of images, radar, LiDAR, etc.
“In autonomous driving applications, the observation space is mainly composed of sensory information made up of images, radar, LiDAR, etc.”
The paper relies on this without support.
DQN has been developed to operate in discrete action spaces.
“DQN has been developed to operate in discrete action spaces.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep learning methods are particularly well suited for detecting and recognizing objects in 2D images and 3D point clouds acquired from video cameras and LiDAR devices.
“Deep learning methods are particularly well suited for detecting and recognizing objects in 2D images and 3D point clouds acquired from video cameras and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) devices, respectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the autonomous driving community, 3D perception is mainly based on LiDAR sensors, which provide a direct 3D representation of the surrounding environment in the form of 3D point clouds.
“In the autonomous driving community, 3D perception is mainly based on LiDAR sensors, which provide a direct 3D representation of the surrounding environment in the form of 3D point clouds.”
The paper relies on this without support.
3D sensors, such as Velodyne, usually have a 360° horizontal field of view.
“3D sensors, such as Velodyne ® , usually have a 360 ◦ horizontal field of view.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 3D object detection precision is dictated by the resolution of the sensor, with most advanced LiDARs being able to provide a 3 cm accuracy.
“The 3D object detection precision is dictated by the resolution of the sensor, with most advanced LiDARs being able to provide a 3 cm accuracy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cameras are also sensitive to bad weather, if the weather conditions are obstructing the field of view.
“Cameras are also sensitive to bad weather, if the weather conditions are obstructing the field of view.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Apart from these sensing technologies, radar and ultrasonic sensors are used to enhance perception capabilities.
“Apart from these sensing technologies, radar and ultrasonic sensors are used to enhance perception capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.
“However, point clouds alone do not contain the rich visual information available in images.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is no commonly agreed definition for the term safety in the context of machine learning or deep learning.
“There is no commonly agreed definition for the term safety in the context of machine learning or deep learning.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.
“The daily data recorded by an autonomous vehicle is on the order of petabytes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
NVIDIA is the market leader in providing hardware solutions for deploying deep learning algorithms inside autonomous cars.
“The market leader in providing hardware solutions for deploying deep learning algorithms inside autonomous cars is NVIDIA ® .”
The paper relies on this without support.
Germany is the most active country for driving recording vehicles.
“Germany is the most active country for driving recording vehicles.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The development of reliability will strengthen the engineering behind autonomous vehicles' openness and accountability.
“The development of reliability will strengthen the engineering behind autonomous vehicles' openness and accountability [27], [89].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
Section 7 (p. 16) says deep-learning techniques are becoming reliable for safety-critical systems but that safety assurance remains an open question and new standards are needed. Section 10 (p. 20) also identifies explainability as an unresolved issue. The paper does not say that developing reliability will strengthen autonomous-vehicle engineering’s openness or accountability. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIsraelson and Ahmed have demonstrated that there exists a fundamental requirement for computational guarantee to foster interactions between human-autonomous systems.
“Israelson and Ahmed have demonstrated that there exists a fundamental requirement for computational guarantee to foster interactions between human-autonomous systems.”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
The Discussion and Conclusions (p. 20) discusses functional safety as an open challenge, and Final Notes (p. 21) describes the difficulty of proving autonomous-vehicle safety. Neither passage says that Israelson and Ahmed demonstrated a fundamental requirement for computational guarantees to foster human–autonomous-system interactions. Searches for their names and for that requirement found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe populace's adoption of autonomous vehicle technology would expand if the intended consumers' involvement, ideas, and expectations are sought out during the conception and creation of autonomous vehicles.
“The populace's adoption of the aforementioned technology would expand if the intended consumers' involvement, ideas, and expectations are sought out during the conception and creation of autonomous vehicles [27], [89].”
From A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
The Introduction (p. 3) discusses autonomous-vehicle deployment, while the Final Notes (p. 21) discuss technical design and safety challenges. Neither addresses whether seeking intended consumers’ involvement, ideas, and expectations during development would increase public adoption; searches for consumer involvement and public acceptance found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDeep learning is a powerful tool for generating multimodal data suitable for robotics and autonomous systems.
“Up to now, deep learning has proven to be a powerful tool for generating multimodal data suitable for robotics and autonomous systems [146].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [146]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Five SAE levels are said to run from 0 to 5
MinorA scale numbered from 0 through 5 contains six levels, not five.
“there are actually five SAE Levels used to define autonomous driving.”
“The SAE J3016 standard [4] introduces a scale from 0 to 5 for grading vehicle automation.”
Oxford dataset has two different licenses
MinorTable 2 lists a ShareAlike 3.0 license for Oxford, whereas the prose specifies a Noncommercial 4.0 license without ShareAlike.
“| Oxford [153] | 3D tracking, 3D object detection, SLAM | Stereo and monocular cameras, GPS Lidar, IMU | 23 TB (133 clips) | Oxford | Urban, Highway | CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 |”
“The Oxford database uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0. which, compared with the first license type, does not force the user to distribute his contributions under the same license as the database.”
Safety standard number changes from ISO 26262 to ISO26226
MinorThe safety discussion repeatedly identifies the standard as ISO 26262 but attributes its hazard definition to ISO26226.
“According to ISO26226, a hazard is defined as 'potential source of harm caused by a malfunctioning behavior, where harm is a physical injury or damage to the health of a person' [131].”
“The ISO 26262 standard for functional safety of road vehicles provides a comprehensive set of requirements for assuring safety, but does not address the unique characteristics of deep learning-based software.”
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · see citing works
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 74,248 · see citing works
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · see citing works
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803 · see citing works
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562 · see citing works
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · see citing works
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584 · see citing works
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 31,590 · see citing works
Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357 · see citing works
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137 · see citing works
Girshick, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.169 · Cited by 28,105 · see citing works
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225 · see citing works
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., & Berg, A. C. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · Cited by 22,128 · see citing works
YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.690 · Cited by 19,892 · see citing works
SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation
Badrinarayanan, V., Kendall, A., & Cipolla, R. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 · Cited by 19,631 · see citing works
Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features
Viola, P., & Jones, M. (2005) · Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2001.990517 · Cited by 18,300 · see citing works
YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
Redmon, J., & Farhadi, A. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.02767 · Cited by 17,141 · see citing works
Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., & Jia, J. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.660 · Cited by 16,438 · see citing works
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686 · see citing works
Bellman, R. E. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400835386 · Cited by 14,588 · see citing works
A Multi-Modal Distributed Real-Time IoT System for Urban Traffic Control (Invited Paper)
Khanam, Z., Achari, V. P. S., Boukhennoufa, I., et al. (2024) · Durham Research Online (Durham University) · doi:10.4230/oasics.ng-res.2024.2 · Cited by 14,048 · see citing works
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001 · see citing works
Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.02971 · Cited by 10,782 · see citing works
Vision meets robotics: The KITTI dataset
Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., & Urtasun, R. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913491297 · Cited by 9,913 · see citing works
PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation
Charles, R., Su, H., Mo, K., & Guibas, L. J. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.16 · Cited by 9,767 · see citing works
Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00992698 · Cited by 9,083 · see citing works
(2010) · Cited by 8,261 · see citing works
nuScenes: A Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., & Beijbom, O. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01164 · Cited by 7,152 · see citing works
A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions
Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., & Harwood, D. (1996) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4 · Cited by 6,882 · see citing works
Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · Cited by 6,831 · see citing works
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519 · see citing works
SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size
Iandola, F. N., Han, S., Moskewicz, M. W., Ashraf, K., Dally, W. J., & Keutzer, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07360 · Cited by 6,201 · see citing works
Object Detection With Deep Learning: A Review
Zhao, Z.-Q., Zheng, P., Xu, S.-T., & Wu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2876865 · Cited by 5,545 · see citing works
Model predictive control: Theory and practice—A survey
García, C. E., Prett, D. M., & Morari, M. (1989) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2 · Cited by 5,351 · see citing works
R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Dai, J., Li, Y., He, K., & Sun, J. Z. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.06409 · Cited by 5,135 · see citing works
VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detection
Zhou, Y., & Tuzel, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00472 · Cited by 4,813 · see citing works
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554 · see citing works
CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypoints
Law, H., & Deng, J. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_45 · Cited by 3,852 · see citing works
Multi-view 3D Object Detection Network for Autonomous Driving
Chen, X., Ma, H., Wan, J., Li, B., & Xia, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.691 · Cited by 3,450 · see citing works
End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars
Bojarski, M., Del Testa, D., Dworakowski, D., Firner, B., Flepp, B., Goyal, P., Jackel, L. D., Monfort, M., Muller, U., Zhang, J., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.07316 · Cited by 3,198 · see citing works
PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and SegmentationPreprint
Qi, C. R., Su, H., Mo, K., & Guibas, L. J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.00593 · Cited by 2,929 · see citing works
Frustum PointNets for 3D Object Detection from RGB-D Data
Qi, C. R., Liu, W., Wu, C., Su, H., & Guibas, L. J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00102 · Cited by 2,655 · see citing works
A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-Driving Urban Vehicles
Paden, B. A., Čáp, M., Yong, S. Z., Yershov, D. S., & Frazzoli, E. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2016.2578706 · Cited by 2,601 · see citing works
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML)-2005
津田, 宏. (2006) · 人工知能学会誌 = Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 2,558 · see citing works
PoseNet: A Convolutional Network for Real-Time 6-DOF Camera Relocalization
Kendall, A., Grimes, M., & Cipolla, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.336 · Cited by 2,489 · see citing works
DeepDriving: Learning Affordance for Direct Perception in Autonomous Driving
Chen, C., Seff, A., Kornhauser, A., & Xiao, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.312 · Cited by 1,876 · see citing works
Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Hessel, M., Modayil, J., Van Hasselt, H., Schaul, T., Ostrovski, G., Dabney, W., Horgan, D., Piot, B., Azar, M., & Silver, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11796 · Cited by 1,846 · see citing works
ENet: A Deep Neural Network Architecture for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation
Paszke, A., Chaurasia, A., Kim, S., & Culurciello, E. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.02147 · Cited by 1,826 · see citing works
ICNet for Real-Time Semantic Segmentation on High-Resolution Images
Zhao, H., Qi, X., Shen, X., Shi, J., & Jia, J. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01219-9_25 · Cited by 1,709 · see citing works
Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networks
Katz, G., Barrett, C., Dill, D. L., Julian, K., & Kochenderfer, M. J. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_5 · Cited by 1,706 · see citing works
Joint 3D Proposal Generation and Object Detection from View Aggregation
Ku, J., Mozifian, M., Lee, J., Harakeh, A., & Waslander, S. L. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8594049 · Cited by 1,697 · see citing works
Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission
Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2788613 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Single-Shot Refinement Neural Network for Object Detection
Zhang, S., Wen, L., Bian, X., Lei, Z., & Li, S. Z. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00442 · Cited by 1,678 · see citing works
Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation
Andrychowicz, O. M., Baker, B., Chociej, M., Józefowicz, R., McGrew, B., Pachocki, J., Petron, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., Ray, A., et al. (2020) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919887447 · Cited by 1,643 · see citing works
1 year, 1000 km: The Oxford RobotCar dataset
Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., Linegar, C., & Newman, P. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364916679498 · Cited by 1,632 · see citing works
Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents)
Thrun, S., Burgard, W., & Fox, D. (2005) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 1,440 · see citing works
Semantic object classes in video: A high-definition ground truth database
Brostow, G., Fauqueur, J., & Cipolla, R. (2008) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2008.04.005 · Cited by 1,400 · see citing works
ALVINN: An autonomous land vehicle in a neural network
Pomerleau, D. A. (2018) · Carnegie Mellon University · doi:10.1184/r1/6603146.v1 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Pedestrian detection: A benchmark
Dollár, P., Wojek, C., Schiele, B., & Perona, P. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206631 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Concrete Problems in AI Safety
Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P., Schulman, J., & Mané, D. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.06565 · Cited by 1,314 · see citing works
CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypoints
Law, H., & Deng, J. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01204-1 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Chao, W.-L., Garg, D., Hariharan, B., Campbell, M., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00864 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS)
Trinkle, J., & Matsuoka, Y. (2010) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v31i1.2237 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement Learning framework for Autonomous Driving
Sallab, A. E., Abdou, M., Perot, E., & Yogamani, S. (2017) · Electronic Imaging · doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2017.19.avm-023 · Cited by 1,045 · see citing works
Planning and Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles
Schwarting, W., Alonso-Mora, J., & Rus, D. (2018) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-060117-105157 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Simultaneous Localization and Mapping: A Survey of Current Trends in Autonomous Driving
Bresson, G., Alsayed, Z., Yu, L., & Glaser, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles · doi:10.1109/tiv.2017.2749181 · Cited by 885 · see citing works
End-to-End Learning of Driving Models from Large-Scale Video Datasets
Xu, H., Gao, Y., Yu, F., & Darrell, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.376 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1963) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007079 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Neural Network Methods for Natural Language Processing
Goldberg, Y. (2017) · Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02165-7 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Domain Adaptation for Statistical Classifiers
Daume III, H., & Marcu, D. (2006) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1872 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Continuous Deep Q-Learning with Model-based AccelerationPreprint
Gu, S., Lillicrap, T., Sutskever, I., & Levine, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.00748 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Kendall, A., Hawke, J., Janz, D., Mazur, P., Reda, D., Allen, J.-M., Lam, V.-D., Bewley, A., & Shah, A. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793742 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
(2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems
On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee (2017) · doi:10.4271/j3016_201401 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Perception, Planning, Control, and Coordination for Autonomous Vehicles
Pendleton, S., Andersen, H., Du, X., Shen, X., Meghjani, M., Eng, Y., Rus, D., & Ang, M. (2017) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines5010006 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Luo, W., Yang, B., & Urtasun, R. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00376 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Image-Based Localization Using LSTMs for Structured Feature Correlation
Walch, F., Hazirbas, C., Leal-Taixe, L., Sattler, T., Hilsenbeck, S., & Cremers, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.75 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving
Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., & Shashua, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.03295 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Can FPGAs Beat GPUs in Accelerating Next-Generation Deep Neural Networks?
Nurvitadhi, E., Venkatesh, G., Sim, J., Marr, D., Huang, R., Ong Gee Hock, J., Liew, Y. T., Srivatsan, K., Moss, D., Subhaschandra, S., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays · doi:10.1145/3020078.3021740 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Learning deep control policies for autonomous aerial vehicles with MPC-guided policy search
Zhang, T., Kahn, G., Levine, S., & Abbeel, P. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487175 · Cited by 452 · cited 3× · see citing works
“rently, the largest portion of papers in deep learning for selfdriving cars are focused mainly on perception and End2End learning [81, 124].”
BackgroundInfluential(2005) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a CarPreprint
Bojarski, M., Yeres, P., Choromanska, A., Choromański, K., Firner, B., Jackel, L. D., & Müller, U. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.07911 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26 (NIPS 2013)
Cseke, B., Opper, M., & Sanguinetti, G. (2013) · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Learning Less is More - 6D Camera Localization via 3D Surface Regression
Brachmann, E., & Rother, C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00489 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Overview of Environment Perception for Intelligent Vehicles
Zhu, H., Yuen, K., Mihaylova, L. S., & Leung, H. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2017.2658662 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Ford Campus vision and lidar data set
Pandey, G., McBride, J. R., & Eustice, R. M. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364911400640 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Dynamic monocular machine vision
Dickmanns, E. D., & Graefe, V. (1988) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf01212361 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Luo, W., Yang, B., & Urtasun, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.12395 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Shon, A., Chu, J., Jung, J., Kim, H., & Youn, I. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18010001 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using Specialized Hardware
Ovtcharov, K., Ruwase, O., Kim, J.-Y., Fowers, J., Strauß, K., & Chung, E. S. (2015) · Cited by 310 · see citing works
SGN: Sequential Grouping Networks for Instance Segmentation
Liu, S., Jia, J., Fidler, S., & Urtasun, R. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.378 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Applications of dynamic monocular machine vision
Dickmanns, E. D., & Graefe, V. (1988) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf01212362 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
(2016) · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Learning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation
OpenAI, Andrychowicz, M., Baker, B., Chociej, M., Jozefowicz, R., McGrew, B., Pachocki, J., Petron, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.00177 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Art
Janai, J., Güney, F., Behl, A., & Geiger, A. (2020) · doi:10.1561/9781680836899 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
VLocNet++: Deep Multitask Learning for Semantic Visual Localization and Odometry
Radwan, N., Valada, A., & Burgard, W. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2869640 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Robust Constrained Learning-based NMPC enabling reliable mobile robot path tracking
Ostafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., & Barfoot, T. D. (2016) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364916645661 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
RoarNet: A Robust 3D Object Detection based on RegiOn Approximation Refinement
Shin, K., Kwon, Y. P., & Tomizuka, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2019.8813895 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
A Learning-Based Framework for Velocity Control in Autonomous Driving
Lefèvre, S., Carvalho, A., & Borrelli, F. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tase.2015.2498192 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
On the safety of machine learning: Cyber-physical systems, decision sciences, and data products
Varshney, K. R., & Alemzadeh, H. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0051 · Cited by 211 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This uncertainty caused by the instantiation of the test set can have large safety implications on individual test samples [136].”
BackgroundEnd-to-End Race Driving with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Jaritz, M., de Charette, R., Toromanoff, M., Perot, E., & Nashashibi, F. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460934 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
AdapNet: Adaptive semantic segmentation in adverse environmental conditions
Valada, A., Vertens, J., Dhall, A., & Burgard, W. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989540 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Image-Based Localization Using Hourglass Networks
Melekhov, I., Ylioinas, J., Kannala, J., & Rahtu, E. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.107 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Camera Relocalization by Computing Pairwise Relative Poses Using Convolutional Neural Network
Laskar, Z., Melekhov, I., Kalia, S., & Kannala, J. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.113 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
BDD100K: A Diverse Driving Dataset for Heterogeneous Multitask Learning
Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., & Darrell, T. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.04687 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Pedestrian detection: A benchmark
Dollar, P., Wojek, C., Schiele, B., & Perona, P. (2009) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2009.5206631 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control to Improve Vision-based Mobile Robot Path Tracking
Ostafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., Barfoot, T. D., et al. (2015) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21587 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
End-to-End Learning of Driving Models with Surround-View Cameras and Route Planners
Hecker, S., Dai, D., & Van Gool, L. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_27 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Hoermann, S., Bach, M., & Dietmayer, K. (2018) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460874 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Detecting unexpected obstacles for self-driving cars: Fusing deep learning and geometric modeling
Ramos, S., Gehrig, S., Pinggera, P., Franke, U., & Rother, C. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995849 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Grid Path Planning with Deep Reinforcement Learning: Preliminary Results
Panov, A. I., Yakovlev, K., & Suvorov, R. E. (2018) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.054 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Computer Vision for Autonomous Vehicles: Problems, Datasets and State of the Art
Janai, J., Güney, F., Behl, A., & Geiger, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.05519 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Learning a deep neural net policy for end-to-end control of autonomous vehicles
Rausch, V., Hansen, A., Solowjow, E., Liu, C., Kreuzer, E. J., & Hedrick, J. K. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963716 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
On-line regression algorithms for learning mechanical models of robots: A survey
Sigaud, O., Salaün, C., & Padois, V. (2011) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2011.07.006 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Making the Case for Safety of Machine Learning in Highly Automated Driving
Burton, S., Gauerhof, L., & Heinzemann, C. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_1 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Engineering safety in machine learning
Varshney, K. R. (2016) · Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA) · doi:10.1109/ita.2016.7888195 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
DeepPicar: A Low-Cost Deep Neural Network-Based Autonomous Car
Bechtel, M. G., Mcellhiney, E., Kim, M., et al. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA) · doi:10.1109/rtcsa.2018.00011 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Ostafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., & Barfoot, T. D. (2014) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2014.6907444 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
End-to-End Deep Learning for Steering Autonomous Vehicles Considering Temporal DependenciesPreprint
Eraqi, H. M., Moustafa, M. N., & Honer, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.03804 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Autonomous racing using learning Model Predictive Control
Rosolia, U., Carvalho, A., & Borrelli, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963748 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
A new benchmark for vision-based cyclist detection
Li, X., Flohr, F. B., Yang, Y., Xiong, H., Braun, M., Pan, S., Li, K., & Gavrila, D. M. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2016.7535515 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Watch this: Scalable cost-function learning for path planning in urban environments
Wulfmeier, M., Wang, D. Z., & Posner, I. (2016) · 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759328 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Combining neural networks and tree search for task and motion planning in challenging environments
Paxton, C., Raman, V., Hager, G. D., & Kobilarov, M. (2017) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206505 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
An Analysis of ISO 26262: Machine Learning and Safety in Automotive Software
Salay, R., Queiroz, R., & Czarnecki, K. (2018) · SAE Technical Paper Series · doi:10.4271/2018-01-1075 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Test methodology for rain influence on automotive surround sensors
Hasirlioglu, S., Kamann, A., Doric, I., & Brandmeier, T. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2016.7795918 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive SoftwarePreprint
Salay, R., Queiroz, R., & Czarnecki, K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.02435 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Leveraging Deep Visual Descriptors for Hierarchical Efficient Localization
Sarlin, P.-E., Debraine, F., Dymczyk, M., Siegwart, R., & Cadena, C. (2018) · Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000318818 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
A Fast Integrated Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous Driving via Imitation Learning
Sun, L., Peng, C., Zhan, W., & Tomizuka, M. (2018) · Volume 3: Modeling and Validation; Multi-Agent and Networked Systems; Path Planning and Motion Control; Tracking Control Systems; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Application; Unmanned Ground and Aerial Vehicles; Vibration in Mechanical Systems; Vibrations and Control of Systems; Vibrations: Modeling, Analysis, and Control · doi:10.1115/dscc2018-9249 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
End-to-End Driving in a Realistic Racing Game with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Perot, E., Jaritz, M., Toromanoff, M., et al. (2017) · IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2017.64 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Learning to Localize Using a LiDAR Intensity MapPreprint
Bârsan, I. A., Wang, S., Pokrovsky, A., & Urtasun, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.10902 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Yin, H., & Berger, C. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) · doi:10.1109/itsc.2017.8317828 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
(2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The Concepts of Risk and Safety
Möller, N. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_3 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Yu, L., Shao, X., Wei, Y., & Zhou, K. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18092905 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
On Human Intellect and Machine Failures: Troubleshooting Integrative Machine Learning Systems
Nushi, B., Kamar, E. S., Horvitz, E., & Kossmann, D. (2017) · AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10633 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV)
(2017) · doi:10.1109/iv39261.2017 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Autonomous car following: A learning-based approach
Lefèvre, S., Carvalho, A., & Borrelli, F. (2015) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2015.7225802 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Barnes, D., Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., & Posner, I. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460564 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Developing artificial neural networks for safety critical systems
Kurd, Z., Kelly, T., & Austin, J. (2006) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-006-0039-9 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Repetitive learning model predictive control: An autonomous racing example
Brunner, M., Rosolia, U., Gonzales, J., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes · doi:10.1109/cdc.2017.8264027 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Yang, S., Wang, W., Liu, C., Deng, W., & Hedrick, J. K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995850 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Grigorescu, S. M., Trăsnea, B., Marina, L., et al. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2926224 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationOstafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., & Barfoot, T. D. (2013) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2013.6696350 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Aggressive Deep Driving: Combining Convolutional Neural Networks and Model Predictive Control
Drews, P., Williams, G., Goldfain, B., Theodorou, E. A., & Rehg, J. M. (2017) · Conference on Robot Learning · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Deep Reinforcement Learning for autonomous driving
Toromanoff, M., Wirbel, É., & Moutarde, F. (2019) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Tinchev, G., Penate-Sanchez, A., & Fallon, M. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2895264 · Cited by 51 · cited 1× · see citing works
“uses a deep neural network to build a learned representation of the driving scene from LiDAR sweeps and intensity maps. The localization of the vehicle is obtained through convolutional matching. In (Tinchev et al., 2019), laser scans and a deep neural network are used to learn descriptors for localization Figure 6: E…”
MethodPath tracking of highly dynamic autonomous vehicle trajectories via iterative learning control
Kapania, N. R., & Gerdes, J. C. (2015) · 2015 American Control Conference (ACC) · doi:10.1109/acc.2015.7171151 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
End-to-End Tracking and Semantic Segmentation Using Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Ondrúška, P., Dequaire, J., Wang, D. Z., & Posner, I. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1604.05091 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Understanding Performance Differences of FPGAs and GPUs
Cong, J., Fang, Z., Lo, M., et al. (2018) · ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGA) · doi:10.1145/3174243.3174970 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Aggressive Deep Driving: Model Predictive Control with a CNN Cost ModelPreprint
Drews, P., Williams, G., Goldfain, B., Theodorou, E. A., & Rehg, J. M. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.05303 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
KNIGHT, J. C. (2002) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/581404.581406 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
A Multi-sensor Traffic Scene Dataset with Omnidirectional Video
Koschorrek, P., Piccini, T., Öberg, P. Å., Felsberg, M., Nielsen, L., & Mester, R. (2013) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2013.110 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Debugging Machine Learning TasksPreprint
Chakarov, A., Nori, A. V., Rajamani, S. K., Sen, S., & Vijaykeerthy, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.07292 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Agile Off-Road Autonomous Driving Using End-to-End Deep Imitation Learning.
Pan, Y., Cheng, C.-A., Saigol, K., Lee, K., Yan, X., Theodorou, E. A., & Boots, B. (2017) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Human-like planning of swerve maneuvers for autonomous vehicles
Gu, T., Dolan, J. M., & Lee, J.-W. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) · doi:10.1109/ivs.2016.7535466 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Feature Learning for Scene Flow Estimation from LIDAR
Ushani, A. K., & Eustice, R. M. (2018) · Conference on Robot Learning · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Combining Neural Networks and Tree Search for Task and Motion Planning in Challenging EnvironmentsPreprint
Paxton, C., Raman, V., Hager, G. D., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.07887 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Application of iterative learning control in tracking a Dubin’s path in parallel parking
Panomruttanarug, B. (2017) · International Journal of Automotive Technology · doi:10.1007/s12239-017-0107-4 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Learning Deep Control Policies for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles with MPC-Guided Policy SearchPreprint
Zhang, T., Kahn, G., Levine, S., et al. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.06791 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Kamel, M. A., Hafez, A. T., & Yu, X. (2018) · Journal of Engineering Science and Military Technologies /Journal of Engineering Science and Military Technologies · Cited by 16 · see citing works
A fault-value injection approach for multiple-weight-fault tolerance of MNNs
Takanami, I., Sato, M., & Yang, Y. P. (2000) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2000.861360 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Zhou, F., Li, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017) · International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems · doi:10.1177/1729881417710634 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Challenges in Autonomous Vehicle Validation
Koopman, P. J. (2017) · doi:10.1145/3055378.3055379 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Deep Grid Net (DGN): A Deep Learning System for Real-Time Driving Context Understanding
Marina, L. A., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., Vasilcoi, A., Moldoveanu, F., & Grigorescu, S. M. (2019) · 2019 Third IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC) · doi:10.1109/irc.2019.00073 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficient Bayesian local model learning for control
Meier, F., Hennig, P., & Schaal, S. (2014) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942865 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
An Efficient Object Detection Algorithm Based on Compressed Networks
Li, J., Peng, K., & Chang, C.-C. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10070235 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Eastwood, K., Hancharyk, B., & Pace, D. A. (2005) · IEEE Industry Applications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mia.2005.1423899 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Learning-based Control for Autonomous Mobile Robots
Ostafew, C. (2016) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Yang, S. K., Wang, W., Liu, C., Deng, K., & Hedrick, J. K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.09744 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Faria J. M., 2018, Machine Learning Safety: An Overview, Safety‐Critical Systems Club
- Flohr F. &Gavrila D. M.(2013). Daimler pedestrian segmentation benchmark dataset. InProceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference.
- Garcia‐Favrot O. &Parent M.(2009). Laser scanner based SLAM in real road and traffic environment. InIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA09). Workshop on Safe Navigation in Open and Dynamic Environments Application to Autonomous Vehicles.
- Harris M., 2016, Google reports self‐driving car mistakes: 272 Failures and 13 near misses, The Guardian
- Krizhevsky A., 2012, Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS), 1097
- McPherson J., 2018, How Uber's self‐driving technology could have failed in the fatal tempe crash, Forbes
- Nguyen‐Tuong D., 2008, Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Conference, 1193
- O'Kane S., 2018, How Tesla and Waymo are tackling a major problem for self‐driving cars: Data, Transportation
- Pan Y., 2017, 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems NIPS 2017
- Rawlings J., 2009, Model predictive control: Theory and design
- Rehder E. Quehl J. &Stiller C.(2017). Driving like a human: Imitation learning for path planning using convolutional neural networks. InInternational Conference on Robotics and Automation Workshops.
- Seeger C. Müller A. &Schwarz L.(2016). Towards road type classification with occupancy grids. InIntelligent Vehicles Symposium—Workshop: DeepDriving—Learning Representations for Intelligent Vehicles IEEE. Gothenburg Sweden.
- Ushani A. K., 2018, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 283
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayoudh, K., Knani, R., Hamdaoui, F., & Mtibaa, A. (2022) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-021-02166-7 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
A Review of Trustworthy and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Sulthana, A. R., Ghosh, D., Dhingra, D., & Sikdar, B. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3294569 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
“• Users’ Perspective Layout: The populace’s adoption of the aforementioned technology would expand if the intended consumers’ involvement, ideas, and expectations are sought out during the conception and creation of autonomous vehicles [27], [89].”
BackgroundAutonomous driving system: A comprehensive survey
Zhao, J., Zhao, W., Deng, B., Wang, Z., Zhang, F., Zheng, W., Cao, W., Nan, J., Lian, Y., & Burke, A. F. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122836 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving
Cui, C., Ma, Y., Cao, X., Ye, W., Zhou, Y., Liang, K., Chen, J., Lu, J., Yang, Z., Liao, K.-D., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw60836.2024.00106 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Li, G., Yang, Y., Li, S., Qu, X., Lyu, N., & Li, S. E. (2022) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103452 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Towards Human-Centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations
Rong, Y., Leemann, T., Nguyen, T.-T., Fiedler, L., Qian, P., Unhelkar, V., Seidel, T., Kasneci, G., & Kasneci, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3331846 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Free lunch for testing: fuzzing deep-learning libraries from open source
Wei, A., Deng, Y., Yang, C., & Zhang, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3510003.3510041 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in food science and nutrition: A narrative review
Miyazawa, T., Hiratsuka, Y., Toda, M., Hatakeyama, N., Ozawa, H., Abe, C., Cheng, T.-Y., Matsushima, Y., Miyawaki, Y., Ashida, K., et al. (2022) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuac033 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Fully Autonomous Programming with Large Language Models
Liventsev, V., Grishina, A., Härmä, A., & Moonen, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference · doi:10.1145/3583131.3590481 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
A Battery-Free Long-Range Wireless Smart Camera for Face Detection
Giordano, M., Mayer, P., & Magno, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Energy Harvesting and Energy-Neutral Sensing Systems · doi:10.1145/3417308.3430273 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Brain-inspired computing systems: a systematic literature review
Zolfagharinejad, M., Alegre-Ibarra, U., Chen, T., Kinge, S., & van der Wiel, W. G. (2024) · The European Physical Journal B · doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00703-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Decentralized Federated Learning for Road User Classification in Enhanced V2X Networks
Barbieri, L., Savazzi, S., & Nicoli, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops) · doi:10.1109/iccworkshops50388.2021.9473581 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Sources of Opacity in Computer Systems: Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy
Mann, S., Crook, B., Kästner, L., Schomäcker, A., & Speith, T. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 31st International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew57809.2023.00063 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
CyberCortex.AI: an AI-based operating system for autonomous robotics and complex automation
Grigorescu, S., & Zaha, M. (2025) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.22426 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationISP Meets Deep Learning: A Survey on Deep Learning Methods for Image Signal Processing
Santos, C. F. G. D., Arrais, R. R., Silva, J. V. S. D., Silva, M. H. M. D., Neto, W. B. G. D. A., Lopes, L. T., Bileki, G. A., Lima, I. O., Rondon, L. B., Souza, B. M. D., et al. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3708516 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“In the field of Deep Learning, a great number of surveys is already available in many different areas, such as agriculture [58], biometrics [27], cyber security [7], regularization [98], autonomous driving [33], medical imaging [71], and also on more technical areas, such as on CNN [69].”
Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Labarta, T., Kulicheva, E., Froelian, R., Geißler, C., Melman, X., & von Klitzing, J. (2024) · Communications in Computer and Information Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-63803-9_16 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“AI systems that make use of learned models to solve classification, segmentation, and transformation tasks for different input modalities such as images, video, text, and natural spoken language have shown or have the potential to outperform humans on specific tasks [14,17].”
BackgroundA lightweight backdoor defense framework based on image inpainting
Wei, Y., Gao, H., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., & Liu, H. (2023) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.03.052 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Despite various advances, high computational costs and complexity associated with HE still persist when integrating in PPML [2].”
- Authors
- Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G.
- Affiliations
- Transilvania University of Brașov (RO)
- Artificial Intelligence, Elektrobit Automotive Robotics, Vision and Control Laboratory, Transilvania University of Brasov Brasov Romania
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-14
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-386
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W2981207549
- Semantic Scholar
- a595767fa35bcc84362f629fbc4d2d9b05d7342a
- Cited by
- 1,809
- References
- 174
- Citations by year
- 2026: 207 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 360 · 2023: 337 · 2022: 288 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 66.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Journal of Field Robotics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, autonomous vehicles, deep learning architectures, convolutional neural networks, recurrent neural networks, deep reinforcement learning, path planning, behavior arbitration, motion control, AI safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review