The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometer with new features
Abstract
The construction and performance of an electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometer with new features are described. The mass spectrometer consists of a newly designed electrospray ion‐source that is plugged directly into a modified commercial quadrupole mass spectrometer with the ions entering the mass analyzer through a long metal capillary tube and three stages of differential pumping. The present ion source differs from previous designs in the combination of techniques employed in the transportation and desolvation of solvated biomolecule ions, prior to mass analysis. Transport of ionized entities between atmospheric pressure and vacuum is carried out through a 203 mm long stainless steel capillary tube with a 0.5 mm bore. Desolvation is effected by the use of controlled heat transfer through the long capillary tube and collisional activation in a region of reduced pressure between the capillary tube exit and the skimmer. Desolvation with this system is convenient and effective and does not involve the strong countercurrent flows of gases that have been used by all previous workers. The effects on the spectra of peptides of capillary tube temperature and desolvation collision energy are investigated. Electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometric results are described for thirteen proteins with molecular masses ranging from 5000 to 77 000 Da. The performance of the present instrument, with respect to mass accuracy and sensitivity, is comparable with previously reported systems. The effect of protein concentration in solution on the electrospray mass spectrometric response and charge‐state distribution is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Dongré, A. R., Jones, J. L., Somogyi, Á., & Wysocki, V. H. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9542193 · Cited by 894
Organic Reactions in Microdroplets: Reaction Acceleration Revealed by Mass Spectrometry
Yan, X., Bain, R. M., & Cooks, R. G. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201602270 · Cited by 583
[21] Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry
Fred Banks, J., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1996) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(96)70023-x · Cited by 522
Senko, M. W., Hendrickson, C. L., Emmett, M. R., Shi, S. D. H., & Marshall, A. G. (1997) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1016/s1044-0305(97)00126-8 · Cited by 462
Rodriguez-Cruz, S. E., Jockusch, R. A., & Williams, E. R. (1999) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9911871 · Cited by 201
Metadata
- Authors
- Chowdhury, S. K., Katta, V., & Chait, B. T.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 81-87
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W4243799879
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometer with new features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1290040305
- The paper
- Chowdhury, S. K., Katta, V., & Chait, B. T. (1990). An electrospray‐ionization mass spectrometer with new features. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1290040305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.