The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative aspects of the matrix‐assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry of complex oligosaccharides
Abstract
Comparative studies of the matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization of complex oligosaccharides were made using a range of mono, di‐ and tri‐substituted benzoic acids, substituted coumarins and cinnamic acids. The best results were obtained with 2,5‐dihydroxybenzoic acid (2,5‐DHB). Detection limits using this matrix were in the range of 100 fmol for complex and high mannose sugars, some 2‐fold better than those obtained with α‐cyano‐4‐ hydroxycinnamic acid and 10‐fold better than with an earlier oligosaccharide matrix, 3‐amino‐4‐hydroxybenzoic acid. The strongest signals were achieved with a matrix‐to‐sample ratio of about 5000:1. Little correlation was found between the measured peak height and sample loading when 3‐amino‐4‐hydroxybenzoic acid was used as the matrix and the signal appeared to saturate at a sample level of around 30 pmol. However, good correlation was found between the amount of sample loaded onto the target and the response when an analogous compound was used as an internal standard and peak ratios were measured. In contrast to this, the use of 2,5‐dihydroxy‐benzoic acid as the matrix enabled the oligosaccharide to be measured over the range 100fmol to at least 100pmol with an excellent linear correlation between sample quantity and response and without the need of a standard. No evidence of saturation was found with this matrix. With 2,5‐DHB (other matrices were not tested), the oligosaccharide signal strength was found to fall with increasing molecular weight in a linear manner and similar to that found previously with proteins. Signal strength from individual sugars also fell when these were measured in mixtures. Derivatization (peracetylation) generally caused an increase in signal strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Umaña, P., Jean–Mairet, J., Moudry, R., Amstutz, H., & Bailey, J. E. (1999) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/6179 · Cited by 764
Structural Investigations of Glycoconjugates at High Sensitivity
Mechref, Y., & Novotny, M. V. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0103017 · Cited by 341
Simpson, S. D., Ashford, D. A., Harvey, D. J., & Bowles, D. J. (1998) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/8.6.579 · Cited by 108
Self-citationQuantitative MALDI-TOF MS of oligonucleotides and a nuclease assay
Sarracino, D., & Richert, C. (1996) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/0960-894x(96)00465-9 · Cited by 72
Harvey, D. J. (2018) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.21530 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Harvey, D. J.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 614-619
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W1999629817
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative aspects of the matrix‐assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry of complex oligosaccharides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1290070712
- The paper
- Harvey, D. J. (1993). Quantitative aspects of the matrix‐assisted laser desorption mass spectrometry of complex oligosaccharides. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1290070712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.