The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrogen balance and δ 15 N: why you're not what you eat during pregnancy
Abstract
Carbon ( 13 C/ 12 C) and nitrogen ( 15 N/ 14 N) stable isotope ratios were longitudinally measured in human hair that reflected the period from pre‐conception to delivery in 10 pregnant women. There was no significant change in the δ 13 C results, but all subjects showed a decrease in δ 15 N values (−0.3 to −1.1‰) during gestation. The mechanisms causing this decrease in hair δ 15 N have not been fully elucidated. However, since the δ 15 N values of dietary nitrogen and urea nitrogen are significantly lower compared to maternal tissues, it is hypothesized that the increased utilization of dietary and urea nitrogen for tissue synthesis during pregnancy resulted in a reduction of the steady state diet to a body trophic level effect by approximately 0.5–1‰. An inverse correlation (R 2 = 0.67) between hair δ 15 N and weight gain was also found, suggesting that positive nitrogen balance results in a reduction of δ 15 N values independent of diet. These results indicate that δ 15 N measurements have the ability to monitor not only dietary inputs, but also the nitrogen balance of an organism. A potential application of this technique is the detection of fertility patterns in modern and ancient species that have tissues that linearly record stable isotope ratios through time. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiology of Pregnancy and Nutrient Metabolism
King, J. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1218s · Cited by 525
Cited by
Fuller, B. T., Fuller, J. L., Harris, D. A., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20249 · Cited by 586
Self-citationBeyond diet reconstruction: Stable isotope applications to human physiology, health, and nutrition
Reitsema, L. J. (2013) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.22398 · Cited by 289
Min, K.-J., Hogan, M. F., Tatar, M., & O’Brien, D. M. (2006) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.04.004 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuller, B. T., Fuller, J. L., Sage, N. E., Harris, D. A., O'Connell, T. C., & Hedges, R. E. M.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2889-2896
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W1989210181
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrogen balance and δ 15 N: why you're not what you eat during pregnancy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.1708
- The paper
- Fuller, B. T., Fuller, J. L., Sage, N. E., Harris, D. A., O'Connell, T. C., & Hedges, R. E. M. (2004). Nitrogen balance and δ 15 N: why you're not what you eat during pregnancy. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.