Cited by 65Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Resource allocation to reproduction and soma in Drosophila: a stable isotope analysis of carbon from dietary sugar

Min, Kyung-Jin, Hogan, Meghan F., Tatar, Marc, O’Brien, Diane M.·2006·Journal of Insect Physiology

Abstract

Metabolic resources in adults of holometabolous insects may derive either from larval or adult feeding. In Drosophila melanogaster, reproduction and lifespan are differently affected by larval vs. adult resource availability, and it is unknown how larval vs. adult acquired nutrients are differentially allocated to somatic and reproductive function. Here we describe the allocation of carbon derived from dietary sugar in aging female D. melanogaster. Larval and adult flies were fed diets contrasting in sucrose (13)C/(12)C, from which we determined the extent to which carbon acquired at each stage contributed to adult somatic tissue and to egg manufacture. Dietary sugar is very important in egg provisioning; at every age, roughly one half of the carbon in eggs was derived from sugar, which turned over from predominantly larval to entirely adult dietary sources. Sucrose provided approximately 40% of total somatic carbon, of which adult dietary sucrose came to supply approximately 75%. Unlike in eggs, however, adult acquired sucrose did not entirely replace the somatic carbon from larvally acquired sucrose. Because carbon from larval sucrose appears to be fairly "replaceable", larval sucrose cannot be a limiting substrate in resource allocation between reproduction and lifespan.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2006.04.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The actual δ13C values for flies on beet/cane and cane/beet represent a weighted average of contributions of carbon from larval and adult feeding.

    “The actual δ 13 C values for flies on beet/cane and cane/beet represent a weighted average of contributions of carbon from larval and adult feeding (Min et al., 2006), allowing us to estimate the relative contributions of larval and adult carbon derived from sugar.”
  • Energy reserves acquired during the larval stages of holometabolous insects are stored in the larval fat body to fuel the later re-architecture of the animal to the adult form during metamorphosis.

    “Energy reserves acquired during the larval stages of holometabolous insects are stored in the larval fat body to fuel the later re-architecture of the animal to the adult form during metamorphosis.”
  • A high-turnover 'fast' pool of carbon associated with reproductive effort and a 'slow' pool of somatic carbon exist.

    “Min et al. (Min et al., 2006) proposed the existence of a high-turnover 'fast' pool of carbon associated with reproductive effort, and a 'slow' pool of somatic carbon.”
  • Early egg production is largely supported by larval nutrition, with half of the carbon content of the eggs derived from dietary sugar.

    “Previous work has shown that early egg production is largely supported by larval nutrition, with half of the carbon content of the eggs derived from dietary sugar (Min et al., 2006;O'Brien et al., 2008).”
  • Larval nutrients not consumed during metamorphosis are allocated to somatic maintenance and reproduction in the adult.

    “Those larval nutrients that are not consumed during metamorphosis are allocated to somatic maintenance and reproduction in the adult (Fischer et al., 2004;Boggs and Freeman, 2005;Min et al., 2006;Boggs, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Min, K.-J., Hogan, M. F., Tatar, M., & O’Brien, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Wellesley College (US)
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
Corresponding author
O’Brien, Diane M.
Venue
Journal of Insect Physiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
763-770
ISSN
0022-1910 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028169219
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Insect Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG021953-03, R01 AG024360-01)
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Science Foundation (EPS-0346770)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
Drosophila melanogaster, resource allocation, reproduction, somatic maintenance, lifespan, dietary sucrose, carbon isotope labeling, egg provisioning
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Isotopes, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Larva, Nitrogen, Ovum, Reproduction, Sucrose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review