Cited by 37Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesGeological and Geochemical AnalysisAnalytical chemistry methods development

Temperature dependencies of high-temperature reduction on conversion products and their isotopic signatures

Leuenberger, Markus C., Filot, Marc S.·2007·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

High-temperature reduction (HTR) is widely used for oxygen and hydrogen isotope determination. Decomposition of cellulose, sucrose and polyethylene foil by HTR is quantitative for temperatures around 1450 degrees C. For lower reaction temperature production of CO(2), water and the deposition of carbon inside the reactor are significant and thus the element of interest for isotopic analysis is split into different pools, leading to isotope fractionation. After reduction of cellulose or sucrose at 1125 degrees C less than 60% of the oxygen is found as CO, which is monitored with the isotope ratio mass spectrometer to determine the delta(18)O value. The remaining oxygen is unevenly distributed between CO(2) and H(2)O, preferentially as CO(2). Raising the reaction temperature to 1425 degrees C yields almost quantitative conversion of oxygen into CO and results in a 3 per thousand more positive delta(18)O value. Similarly, only 40-50% of the carbon of cellulose and sucrose is transformed into CO in the HTR reactor at 1125 degrees C. This is far from the stoichiometric expected value of 83% for quantitative carbon transfer for cellulose and 92% for sucrose. Of the carbon 40-50% is deposited in the reactor and the remainder can be found as CO(2). Based on the comparison of carbon isotope results from HTR and those obtained from combustion, we hypothesize that CO produced during the HTR originates partly from sample carbon and glassy carbon. A combined combustion and HTR carbon isoto…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.2998

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leuenberger, M. C., & Filot, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Leuenberger, Markus C.
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-27
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1587-1598
ISSN
  • 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0231
OpenAlex
W2063460738
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
Keywords
high-temperature reduction, oxygen isotope fractionation, carbon isotope fractionation, cellulose, sucrose, polyethylene, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, isotope ratio mass spectrometry, reaction temperature, carbon deposition, glassy carbon, isotope calibration, organic matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review