The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technical considerations for RNA‐based stable isotope probing: an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function
Abstract
An ongoing challenge within microbial ecology is the development of methodologies that attribute microbial community functions to microbial diversity. One approach, involving the incorporation of stable isotopes from labelled tracer compounds into biological signature molecules (biomarkers), may overcome this current limitation. To examine the potential of RNA as the biomarker in stable isotope probing we have generated a series of atom % 13 C‐enriched RNA samples through exploitation of the anabolic abilities of a phenol‐degrading environmental isolate. Isotope ratio mass spectrometry was used to determine the atom % 13 C of each RNA sample (ca. 1–100%). The corresponding buoyant density (1.755–1.795 g mL −1 ) was determined by equilibrium density gradient centrifugation and agarose gel electrophoresis. This empirically defined relationship between the atom % 13 C of RNA and its buoyant density suggests ribonucleic acids with atom % 13 C enrichments greater than 10% can be isolated by equilibrium density centrifugation. The processing and analysis of isolated RNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, cloning and sequencing are discussed. The RNA‐based stable isotope probing protocol presented here will find particular utility in assessing the roles of microbial community members in the biodegradation of natural and anthropogenic xenobiotic compounds. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boschker, H. T. S., Nold, S. C., Wellsbury, P., Bos, D., de Graaf, W., Pel, R., Parkes, R. J., & Cappenberg, T. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/33900 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Raman Microscopic Analysis of Single Microbial Cells
Huang, W. E., Griffiths, R. I., Thompson, I. P., Bailey, M. J., & Whiteley, A. S. (2004) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac049753k · Cited by 411
Self-citationWagner, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073233 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Manefield, M., Whiteley, A. S., Ostle, N., Ineson, P., & Bailey, M. J.
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2179-2183
- ISSN
- 0951-4198 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0231
- OpenAlex
- W2093289319
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technical considerations for RNA‐based stable isotope probing: an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rcm.782
- The paper
- Manefield, M., Whiteley, A. S., Ostle, N., Ineson, P., & Bailey, M. J. (2002). Technical considerations for RNA‐based stable isotope probing: an approach to associating microbial diversity with microbial community function. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.