The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Follow‐up on the characterization of peptidic markers in hair and fur for the identification of common North American species
Abstract
Rationale: Species identification of hair is routinely done by microscopic analysis. Following previous studies that used protein analysis to characterize species markers in hair and wool, the present work aims at covering a larger number of species and to ultimately offer a method for rapid hair identification in forensics and archaeology. Methods: Hair is mostly made of alpha‐keratins; these proteins have only been sequenced in a handful of species and most animal families are under‐represented. Using a methodology developed for the characterization of peptidic markers in tissues such as bone (peptide mass fingerprinting or PMF) and commonly applied on collagen, hair from common North American fur‐bearing species was analyzed by MALDI‐TOF‐MS to obtain peptidic profiles. Results: Alpha‐keratin peptides that are typically dominant on peptide mass profiles of hair were chosen as markers. Matching peaks were identified for each species tested and compared to known sequences from related organisms whenever possible. The markers were used to create a flowchart to narrow down identification to the family level. Conclusions: The methodology was developed on a limited numbers of markers chosen for their variability and reliability on the peptide mass fingerprint. In the absence of genetic sequences, this strategy is a quick way to compare species from a common geographic origin. The work presented here was focused on North American species but could be applied to other animal families.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments, woolen textiles and other fibers, and silks.
“Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has also been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments (57, 128, 129), woolen textiles, and other fibers (130–132) and silks (133, 134).”
From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [132]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1086/279782 · DOI
- 10.1086/280006 · DOI
- Wildman AB, 1954, The Microscopy of Animal Textile Fibres
- 10.2307/3625853 · DOI
- Appleyard HM, 1978, Guide to the Identification of Animal Fibres
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1966.tb02948.x · DOI
- Hicks JW, 1977, Microscopy of Hairs: A Practical Guide and Manual
- 10.5962/bhl.title.142652 · DOI
- Teerink BJ, 1991, Hair of West European Mammals: Atlas and Identification Key
- 10.1080/00222930802267187 · DOI
- 10.1080/11250009309355815 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0015-7368(88)72862-5 · DOI
- 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[305:HIKOWA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Brunner H, 1974, The Identification of Mammalian Hair
- 10.1292/jvms.13-0569 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.part.82264 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.part.85550 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.part.82410 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.part.82410 · DOI
- Debrot S, 1982, Atlas des poils de mammiferes d'Europe
- 10.1533/9781845695651.1.6 · DOI
- Greaves PH, 1995, Microscopy of Textile Fibres
- 10.2307/1379911 · DOI
- 10.5962/bhl.part.75960 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00414-009-0383-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12024-010-9169-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.008 · DOI
- 10.4103/0974-7753.51928 · DOI
- Tridico SR, 2005, Examination, analysis, and application of hair in forensic science – Animal hair, Forensic Sci Rev, 17, 17
- 10.1177/004051759906901109 · DOI
- 10.1177/004051750207200809 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.scijus.2008.09.002 · DOI
- 10.1533/9781845695651.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1533/9781845695651.2.133 · DOI
- 10.1177/004051750407400311 · DOI
- 10.1177/004051750307300906 · DOI
- 10.1177/004051750307300811 · DOI
- Rast‐Eicher A, 2016, Fibres: Microscopy of Archaeological Textiles and Furs
- 10.1533/9781845695651.3.335 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12549-015-0227-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90020-9 · DOI
- Batcheller JC, 2005, Scientific Analysis of Ancient and Historic Textiles: Informing Preservation, Display and Interpretation, 52
- Dove CJ, 2002, Microscopic analysis of feather and hair fragments associated with human mummified remains from Kagamil Island, Alaska, Ethnograph Series, 20, 51
- 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.064 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.023 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00553.x · DOI
- 10.1520/JFS15515J · DOI
- 10.1186/2041-2223-2-2 · DOI
- 10.1177/0040517508090488 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.010 · DOI
- 10.1533/9781845695651.2.224 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac020347f · DOI · Paper page
- Hollemeyer K, 2007, Identification of furs of domestic dog, racoon dog, rabbit and domestic cat by hair analysis using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry, Spectrosc Eur, 19, 8
- 10.1002/rcm.3679 · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.6277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/rcm.6730 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0106875 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0003598X00062141 · DOI · Paper page
- Jones AM, 2016, Preserved in the Peat: an Extraordinary Bronze Age Burial on Whitehorse Hill, Dartmoor, and its Wider Context
- 10.1016/j.jas.2014.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3795673 · DOI
- Moore TD, 1974, Identification of the Dorsal Guard Hairs of Some Mammals of Wyoming
- 10.2307/2422262 · DOI
- Obbard ME, 1987, Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America, 1007
- Clayton JL, 1966, The growth and economic significance of the American fur trade, 1790–1890, Minn Hist, 40, 210
- Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein.
- 10.1038/nmeth.f.371 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ancient protein analysis in archaeology
Hendy, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Solazzo, C.
- Affiliations
- Museum Conservation Institute, Museum Support Center Smithsonian Institution 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland MD 20746 USA
- ORCID
- Solazzo, Caroline
- Venue
- Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-31
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1375-1384
- ISSN
- 0951-4198
- 1097-0231
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review