Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Follow‐up on the characterization of peptidic markers in hair and fur for the identification of common North American species

Solazzo, Caroline·2017·Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Rationale: Species identification of hair is routinely done by microscopic analysis. Following previous studies that used protein analysis to characterize species markers in hair and wool, the present work aims at covering a larger number of species and to ultimately offer a method for rapid hair identification in forensics and archaeology. Methods: Hair is mostly made of alpha‐keratins; these proteins have only been sequenced in a handful of species and most animal families are under‐represented. Using a methodology developed for the characterization of peptidic markers in tissues such as bone (peptide mass fingerprinting or PMF) and commonly applied on collagen, hair from common North American fur‐bearing species was analyzed by MALDI‐TOF‐MS to obtain peptidic profiles. Results: Alpha‐keratin peptides that are typically dominant on peptide mass profiles of hair were chosen as markers. Matching peaks were identified for each species tested and compared to known sequences from related organisms whenever possible. The markers were used to create a flowchart to narrow down identification to the family level. Conclusions: The methodology was developed on a limited numbers of markers chosen for their variability and reliability on the peptide mass fingerprint. In the absence of genetic sequences, this strategy is a quick way to compare species from a common geographic origin. The work presented here was focused on North American species but could be applied to other animal families.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rcm.7923

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments, woolen textiles and other fibers, and silks.

    “Where cold, arid, or oxygen-deprived environments have permitted exceptional organic survival, paleoproteomics has also been applied to understand manufacturing of clothing, garments, and textiles such as leather and skin garments (57, 128, 129), woolen textiles, and other fibers (130–132) and silks (133, 134).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [132]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1086/279782 · DOI
  2. 10.1086/280006 · DOI
  3. Wildman AB, 1954, The Microscopy of Animal Textile Fibres
  4. 10.2307/3625853 · DOI
  5. Appleyard HM, 1978, Guide to the Identification of Animal Fibres
  6. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1966.tb02948.x · DOI
  7. Hicks JW, 1977, Microscopy of Hairs: A Practical Guide and Manual
  8. 10.5962/bhl.title.142652 · DOI
  9. Teerink BJ, 1991, Hair of West European Mammals: Atlas and Identification Key
  10. 10.1080/00222930802267187 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/11250009309355815 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0015-7368(88)72862-5 · DOI
  13. 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[305:HIKOWA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. Brunner H, 1974, The Identification of Mammalian Hair
  15. 10.1292/jvms.13-0569 · DOI
  16. 10.5962/bhl.part.82264 · DOI
  17. 10.5962/bhl.part.85550 · DOI
  18. 10.5962/bhl.part.82410 · DOI
  19. 10.5962/bhl.part.82410 · DOI
  20. Debrot S, 1982, Atlas des poils de mammiferes d'Europe
  21. 10.1533/9781845695651.1.6 · DOI
  22. Greaves PH, 1995, Microscopy of Textile Fibres
  23. 10.2307/1379911 · DOI
  24. 10.5962/bhl.part.75960 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00414-009-0383-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s12024-010-9169-6 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.04.008 · DOI
  29. 10.4103/0974-7753.51928 · DOI
  30. Tridico SR, 2005, Examination, analysis, and application of hair in forensic science – Animal hair, Forensic Sci Rev, 17, 17
  31. 10.1177/004051759906901109 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/004051750207200809 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.scijus.2008.09.002 · DOI
  34. 10.1533/9781845695651.1.3 · DOI
  35. 10.1533/9781845695651.2.133 · DOI
  36. 10.1177/004051750407400311 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/004051750307300906 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/004051750307300811 · DOI
  39. Rast‐Eicher A, 2016, Fibres: Microscopy of Archaeological Textiles and Furs
  40. 10.1533/9781845695651.3.335 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s12549-015-0227-7 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/0305-4403(88)90020-9 · DOI
  43. Batcheller JC, 2005, Scientific Analysis of Ancient and Historic Textiles: Informing Preservation, Display and Interpretation, 52
  44. Dove CJ, 2002, Microscopic analysis of feather and hair fragments associated with human mummified remains from Kagamil Island, Alaska, Ethnograph Series, 20, 51
  45. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.05.064 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.023 · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00553.x · DOI
  48. 10.1520/JFS15515J · DOI
  49. 10.1186/2041-2223-2-2 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/0040517508090488 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.010 · DOI
  52. 10.1533/9781845695651.2.224 · DOI
  53. 10.1021/ac020347f · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hollemeyer K, 2007, Identification of furs of domestic dog, racoon dog, rabbit and domestic cat by hair analysis using MALDI TOF mass spectrometry, Spectrosc Eur, 19, 8
  55. 10.1002/rcm.3679 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/rcm.6277 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1002/rcm.6730 · DOI
  58. 10.1371/journal.pone.0106875 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1017/S0003598X00062141 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Jones AM, 2016, Preserved in the Peat: an Extraordinary Bronze Age Burial on Whitehorse Hill, Dartmoor, and its Wider Context
  61. 10.1016/j.jas.2014.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.2307/3795673 · DOI
  63. Moore TD, 1974, Identification of the Dorsal Guard Hairs of Some Mammals of Wyoming
  64. 10.2307/2422262 · DOI
  65. Obbard ME, 1987, Wild Furbearer Management and Conservation in North America, 1007
  66. Clayton JL, 1966, The growth and economic significance of the American fur trade, 1790–1890, Minn Hist, 40, 210
  67. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein.
  68. 10.1038/nmeth.f.371 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Solazzo, C.
Affiliations
Museum Conservation Institute, Museum Support Center Smithsonian Institution 4210 Silver Hill Road Suitland MD 20746 USA
Venue
Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
31
Issue
17
Pages
1375-1384
ISSN
  • 0951-4198
  • 1097-0231
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review