Cited by 44Poverty, Education, and Child WelfareEducational Outcomes and InfluencesSchool Choice and Performance

A systematic review of the literature on the causes of early school leaving in Africa and Asia

Open access
Momo, Michelle S. M., Cabus, Sofie J., De Witte, Kristof, Groot, Wim·2019·Review of Education

Abstract

This paper systematically reviews the literature on the causes of leaving school early in Africa and Asia. Despite the improvement in primary school enrolment in the developing countries by 2015, the persistence of school dropout, however, renders this improvement almost insignificant. This leads to the necessity of observing the prolonged determinants of dropping out from school amid the current global development efforts to improve educational attainment in these countries. For this purpose, we review 43 articles in this study. These articles are peer‐reviewed publications on the causes of early school leaving or school dropout in Africa and Asia, from the year 2001 to present (2018). A great number of causes are found to be linked to the reason for leaving school early. However, the most common causes for early school leaving include lack of income, parents’ education and employment status, living in a single‐parent household, being a illegitimate child, age, region of residence and school performance. Specifically, for Asia, immigration and ethnicity are important factors. This paper recommends that policies to prevent early school leaving require multi‐perspective targeting, involving individual, school, community and family. For instance, attention needs to be drawn to the effective trickling down of necessary school provisions and other contemporary societal provisions to all communities. There is also need for improved individual and family awareness on the positive impact of education as well as the dangers of certain cultural beliefs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rev3.3134

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical studies relying on secondary transition rates (lower to upper secondary and upper secondary to higher education) are absent.

    “empirical studies relying on secondary transition rates (i.e., the likelihood of moving from lower to upper secondary and from upper secondary to higher education) are absent.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Momo, M. S. M., Cabus, S. J., De Witte, K., & Groot, W.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Department of Humanities and Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Momo, Michelle S. M.
Venue
Review of Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-25
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
496-522
ISSN
2049-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892731304
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2022-04-08)
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
school dropout, causes of school dropout, Africa, Asia, parental education, parental employment, single-parent families, illegitimate children, academic performance, immigration, ethnicity, educational attainment, dropout prevention policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review