The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review and meta‐analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection
Abstract
We reviewed studies that reported results of systematic cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening on fetuses and/or live‐born infants. The overall birth prevalence of congenital CMV infection was 0.64%, but varied considerably among different study populations. About 11% of live‐born infants with congenital CMV infection were symptomatic, but the inter‐study differences in definitions of symptomatic cases limit the interpretation of these data. Non‐white race, low socioeconomic status (SES), premature birth, and neonatal intensive care unit admittance were risk factors for congenital CMV infection. Birth prevalence increased with maternal CMV seroprevalence. Maternal seroprevalence accounted for 29% of the variance in birth prevalence between study populations. Maternal seroprevalence and birth prevalence were both higher in study populations that were ascertained at birth rather than in the prenatal period. Thus, timing of ascertainment should be considered when interpreting birth prevalence estimates. Birth prevalence was inversely correlated with mean maternal age, but this relationship was not significant when controlling for maternal seroprevalence. The rate of transmission to infants born to mothers who had a primary infection or a recurrent infection during pregnancy was 32% and 1.4%, respectively. Possible maternal primary infections (i.e. seropositive mother with CMV IgM) resulted in congenital infections about 20% of the time, but are likely to represent a mixture of primary and recurrent infections. In summary, CMV is a common congenital infection worldwide that can lead to permanent disabilities. There is an urgent need for interventions that can reduce the substantial burden of this often overlooked disease. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dollard, S. C., Grosse, S. D., & Ross, D. S. (2007) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.544 · Cited by 1,257
Rawlinson, W. D., Boppana, S. B., Fowler, K. B., Kimberlin, D. W., Lazzarotto, T., Alain, S., Daly, K., Doutré, S., Gibson, L., Giles, M. L., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30143-3 · Cited by 841
Hearing Loss and Congenital CMV Infection: A Systematic Review
Goderis, J., De Leenheer, E., Smets, K., Van Hoecke, H., Keymeulen, A., & Dhooge, I. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1173 · Cited by 586
Risks associated with viral infections during pregnancy
Racicot, K., & Mor, G. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci87490 · Cited by 312
John, S., Yuzhakov, O., Woods, A., Deterling, J., Hassett, K., Shaw, C. A., & Ciaramella, G. (2018) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.029 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenneson, A., & Cannon, M. J.
- Venue
- Reviews in Medical Virology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 253-276
- ISSN
- 1052-9276 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1654
- OpenAlex
- W2133963802
- Cited by
- 1,720
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review and meta‐analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rmv.535
- The paper
- Kenneson, A., & Cannon, M. J. (2007). Review and meta‐analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Reviews in Medical Virology. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.