The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sliding window filter with application to planetary landing
Abstract
We are concerned with improving the range resolution of stereo vision for entry, descent, and landing (EDL) missions to Mars and other planetary bodies. The goal is to create accurate and precise three‐dimensional planetary surface‐structure estimates by filtering sequences of stereo images taken from an autonomous landing vehicle. We describe a sliding window filter (SWF) approach based on delayed state marginalization. The SWF can run in constant time, yet still achieve experimental results close to those of the bundle adjustment solution. This technique can scale from the offline batch least‐squares solution to fast online incremental solutions. For instance, if the window encompasses all time, the solution is equivalent to full bundle adjustment; if only one time step is maintained, the solution matches the extended Kalman filter; if poses and landmarks are slowly marginalized out over time such that the state vector ceases to grow, then the filter becomes constant time, like visual odometry. Within the constant time regime, the sliding window approach demonstrates convergence properties that are close to those of the full batch solution and strictly superior to visual odometry. Experiments with real data show that ground structure estimates follow the expected convergence pattern that is predicted by theory. These experiments indicate the effectiveness of filtering long‐range stereo for EDL. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
(1981) · Cited by 11,963
Numerical Methods for Unconstrained Optimization and Nonlinear Equations
Dennis, J. E., & Schnabel, R. B. (1996) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611971200 · Cited by 7,615
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
Cook, S. A. (1971) · Proceedings of the third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '71 · doi:10.1145/800157.805047 · Cited by 6,385
The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory
Moré, J. J. (1978) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0067700 · Cited by 5,773
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
Rousseeuw, P. J., & Leroy, A. M. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725382 · Cited by 5,609
Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_34 · Cited by 4,555
On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering
Doucet, A., Godsill, S., & Andrieu, C. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1023/a:1008935410038 · Cited by 4,411
Cited by
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669
On-Manifold Preintegration for Real-Time Visual--Inertial Odometry
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2016.2597321 · Cited by 1,502
High-precision, consistent EKF-based visual-inertial odometry
Li, M., & Mourikis, A. I. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913481251 · Cited by 813
Visual Odometry : Part II: Matching, Robustness, Optimization, and Applications
Fraundorfer, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2182810 · Cited by 620
IMU Preintegration on Manifold for Efficient Visual-Inertial Maximum-a-Posteriori Estimation
Forster, C., Carlone, L., Dellaert, F., & Scaramuzza, D. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.006 · Cited by 499
Keyframe-Based Visual-Inertial SLAM using Nonlinear Optimization
Leutenegger, S., Furgale, P., Rabaud, V., Chli, M., Konolige, K., & Siegwart, R. (2013) · Robotics: Science and Systems IX · doi:10.15607/rss.2013.ix.037 · Cited by 447
Place Recognition with ConvNet Landmarks: Viewpoint-Robust, Condition-Robust, Training-Free
Suenderhauf, N., Shirazi, S., Jacobson, A., Dayoub, F., Pepperell, E., Upcroft, B., & Milford, M. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.022 · Cited by 379
Information fusion in navigation systems via factor graph based incremental smoothing
Indelman, V., Williams, S., Kaess, M., & Dellaert, F. (2013) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.05.001 · Cited by 271
Get Out of My Lab: Large-scale, Real-Time Visual-Inertial Localization
Lynen, S., Sattler, T., Bosse, M., Hesch, J., Pollefeys, M., & Siegwart, R. (2015) · Robotics: Science and Systems XI · doi:10.15607/rss.2015.xi.037 · Cited by 243
Batch nonlinear continuous-time trajectory estimation as exactly sparse Gaussian process regression
Anderson, S., Barfoot, T. D., Tong, C. H., & Särkkä, S. (2015) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-015-9455-y · Cited by 87
Consistent sparsification for graph optimization
Huang, G., Kaess, M., & Leonard, J. J. (2013) · 2013 European Conference on Mobile Robots · doi:10.1109/ecmr.2013.6698835 · Cited by 70
Gaussian Process Gauss–Newton for non-parametric simultaneous localization and mapping
Tong, C. H., Furgale, P., & Barfoot, T. D. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913478672 · Cited by 68
Deep Learning Crater Detection for Lunar Terrain Relative Navigation
Downes, L., Steiner, T. J., & How, J. P. (2020) · AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1838 · Cited by 57
Direct semi-dense SLAM for rolling shutter cameras
Kim, J.-H., Cadena, C., & Reid, I. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487263 · Cited by 46
Graph-based terrain relative navigation with optimal landmark database selection
Steiner, T. J., Brady, T. M., & Hoffman, J. A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference · doi:10.1109/aero.2015.7119053 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Sibley, G., Matthies, L., & Sukhatme, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 587-608
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W4246483956
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 11.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
