The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot
Open accessAbstract
Flying robots that can locomote efficiently in GPS‐denied cluttered environments have many applications, such as in search and rescue scenarios. However, dealing with the high amount of obstacles inherent to such environments is a major challenge for flying vehicles. Conventional flying platforms cannot afford to collide with obstacles, as the disturbance from the impact may provoke a crash to the ground, especially when friction forces generate torques affecting the attitude of the platform. We propose a concept of resilient flying robots capable of colliding into obstacles without compromising their flight stability. Such platforms present great advantages over existing robots as they are capable of robust flight in cluttered environments without the need for complex sense and avoid strategies or three‐dimensional mapping of the environment. We propose a design comprising an inner frame equipped with conventional propulsion and stabilization systems enclosed in a protective cage that can rotate passively thanks to a three‐axis gimbal system, which reduces the impact of friction forces on the attitude of the inner frame. After addressing important design considerations thanks to a collision model and validation experiments, we present a proof‐of‐concept platform, named GimBall, capable of flying in various cluttered environments. Field experiments demonstrate the robot's ability to fly fully autonomously through a forest while experiencing multiple collisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones
Floreano, D., & Wood, R. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14542 · Cited by 1,476
Self-citationA Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots
Giusti, A., Guzzi, J., Ciresan, D. C., He, F.-L., Rodriguez, J. P., Fontana, F., Faessler, M., Forster, C., Schmidhuber, J., Caro, G. D., et al. (2016) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2015.2509024 · Cited by 665
The current state and future outlook of rescue robotics
Delmerico, J., Mintchev, S., Giusti, A., Gromov, B., Melo, K., Horvat, T., Cadena, C., Hutter, M., Ijspeert, A., Floreano, D., et al. (2019) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21887 · Cited by 371
Self-citationSurvey on Anti-Drone Systems: Components, Designs, and Challenges
Park, S., Kim, H. T., Lee, S., Joo, H., & Kim, H. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3065926 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Briod, A., Kornatowski, P., Zufferey, J., & Floreano, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-26
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 496-509
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-4967
- OpenAlex
- W1496729756
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rob.21495
- The paper
- Briod, A., Kornatowski, P., Zufferey, J., & Floreano, D. (2014). A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot. Journal of Field Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.