Cited by 665Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

A Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots

Open access
Giusti, Alessandro, Guzzi, Jerome, Ciresan, Dan C., He, Fang-Lin, Rodriguez, Juan P., Fontana, Flavio, Faessler, Matthias, Forster, Christian +4 more·2016·IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Abstract

We study the problem of perceiving forest or mountain trails from a single monocular image acquired from the viewpoint of a robot traveling on the trail itself. Previous literature focused on trail segmentation, and used low-level features such as image saliency or appearance contrast; we propose a different approach based on a deep neural network used as a supervised image classifier. By operating on the whole image at once, our system outputs the main direction of the trail compared to the viewing direction. Qualitative and quantitative results computed on a large real-world dataset (which we provide for download) show that our approach outperforms alternatives, and yields an accuracy comparable to the accuracy of humans that are tested on the same image classification task. Preliminary results on using this information for quadrotor control in unseen trails are reported. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first letter that describes an approach to perceive forest trials, which is demonstrated on a quadrotor micro aerial vehicle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/lra.2015.2509024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A deep neural network-based vision recognition system trained on a large dataset performs better than humans at recognising and evaluating forest or mountain trails from a single monocular image.

    “The obtained results showed that a deep neural network-based system, trained on a large dataset, performs better than humans.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giusti, A., Guzzi, J., Ciresan, D. C., He, F.-L., Rodriguez, J. P., Fontana, F., Faessler, M., Forster, C., Schmidhuber, J., Caro, G. D., Scaramuzza, D., & Gambardella, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Venue
IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
Published
2016-07
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
661-667
ISSN
  • 2377-3766 (ISSN-L)
  • 2377-3774
OpenAlex
W2296673577
Cited by
665
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 113 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 15
FWCI
43.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
  • National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) Robotics
  • Supervised Deep/Recurrent Nets (140399)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
deep neural network, mobile robots, quadrotor control, micro air vehicles, visual perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review