Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autonomous, Vision‐based Flight and Live Dense 3D Mapping with a Quadrotor Micro Aerial Vehicle

Open access
Faessler, Matthias, Fontana, Flavio, Forster, Christian, Mueggler, Elias, Pizzoli, Matia, Scaramuzza, Davide·2016·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

The use of mobile robots in search‐and‐rescue and disaster‐response missions has increased significantly in recent years. However, they are still remotely controlled by expert professionals on an actuator set‐point level, and they would benefit, therefore, from any bit of autonomy added. This would allow them to execute high‐level commands, such as “execute this trajectory” or “map this area.” In this paper, we describe a vision‐based quadrotor micro aerial vehicle that can autonomously execute a given trajectory and provide a live, dense three‐dimensional (3D) map of an area. This map is presented to the operator while the quadrotor is mapping, so that there are no unnecessary delays in the mission. Our system does not rely on any external positioning system (e.g., GPS or motion capture systems) as sensing, computation, and control are performed fully onboard a smartphone processor. Since we use standard, off‐the‐shelf components from the hobbyist and smartphone markets, the total cost of our system is very low. Due to its low weight (below 450 g), it is also passively safe and can be deployed close to humans. We describe both the hardware and the software architecture of our system. We detail our visual odometry pipeline, the state estimation and control, and our live dense 3D mapping, with an overview of how all the modules work and how they have been integrated into the final system. We report the results of our experiments both indoors and outdoors. Our quadrotor was demonstrated over 100 times at multiple trade fairs, at public events, and to rescue professionals. We discuss the practical challenges and lessons learned. Code, datasets, and videos are publicly available to the robotics community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.21581

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Faessler, M., Fontana, F., Forster, C., Mueggler, E., Pizzoli, M., & Scaramuzza, D.
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
431-450
ISSN
  • 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4967
OpenAlex
W1530919911
Cited by
247
References
7
FWCI
40.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.