The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control to Improve Vision-based Mobile Robot Path Tracking
Abstract
This paper presents a Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (LB-NMPC) algorithm to achieve high-performance path tracking in challenging off-road terrain through learning. The LB-NMPC algorithm uses a simple a priori vehicle model and a learned disturbance model. Disturbances are modeled as a Gaussian process (GP) as a function of system state, input, and other relevant variables. The GP is updated based on experience collected during previous trials. Localization for the controller is provided by an onboard, vision-based mapping and navigation system enabling operation in large-scale, GPS-denied environments. The paper presents experimental results including over 3 km of travel by three significantly different robot platforms with masses ranging from 50 to 600 kg and at speeds ranging from 0.35 to 1.2 m/s (associated video at http://tiny.cc/RoverLearnsDisturbances). Planned speeds are generated by a novel experience-based speed scheduler that balances overall travel time, path-tracking errors, and localization reliability. The results show that the controller can start from a generic a priori vehicle model and subsequently learn to reduce vehicle- and trajectory-specific path-tracking errors based on experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Terrain Adaptive Navigation for Planetary Rovers
Helmick, D., Angelova, A., & Matthies, L. (2009) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20292 · Cited by 103
Cited by
A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving
Grigorescu, S., Trasnea, B., Cocias, T., & Macesanu, G. (2020) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21918 · Cited by 1,809
Learning-Based Model Predictive Control: Toward Safe Learning in Control
Hewing, L., Wabersich, K. P., Menner, M., & Zeilinger, M. N. (2020) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-090419-075625 · Cited by 835
Learning-Based Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Racing
Kabzan, J., Hewing, L., Liniger, A., & Zeilinger, M. N. (2019) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2019.2926677 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Ostafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., Barfoot, T. D., & Collier, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Field Robotics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06-15
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-152
- ISSN
- 1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1591375184
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.