Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control to Improve Vision-based Mobile Robot Path Tracking

Ostafew, Chris J., Schoellig, Angela P., Barfoot, Timothy D., Collier, Jack·2016·Journal of Field Robotics

Abstract

This paper presents a Learning-based Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (LB-NMPC) algorithm to achieve high-performance path tracking in challenging off-road terrain through learning. The LB-NMPC algorithm uses a simple a priori vehicle model and a learned disturbance model. Disturbances are modeled as a Gaussian process (GP) as a function of system state, input, and other relevant variables. The GP is updated based on experience collected during previous trials. Localization for the controller is provided by an onboard, vision-based mapping and navigation system enabling operation in large-scale, GPS-denied environments. The paper presents experimental results including over 3 km of travel by three significantly different robot platforms with masses ranging from 50 to 600 kg and at speeds ranging from 0.35 to 1.2 m/s (associated video at http://tiny.cc/RoverLearnsDisturbances). Planned speeds are generated by a novel experience-based speed scheduler that balances overall travel time, path-tracking errors, and localization reliability. The results show that the controller can start from a generic a priori vehicle model and subsequently learn to reduce vehicle- and trajectory-specific path-tracking errors based on experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rob.21587

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Ostafew, C. J., Schoellig, A. P., Barfoot, T. D., & Collier, J.
Venue
Journal of Field Robotics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-15
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
133-152
ISSN
1556-4959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591375184
Cited by
196
References
2
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.