The DOI matches its Crossref record; 221 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MODELING THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RIVER MORPHODYNAMICS AND RIPARIAN VEGETATION
Open accessAbstract
The study of river‐riparian vegetation interactions is an important and intriguing research field in geophysics. Vegetation is an active element of the ecological dynamics of a floodplain which interacts with the fluvial processes and affects the flow field, sediment transport, and the morphology of the river. In turn, the river provides water, sediments, nutrients, and seeds to the nearby riparian vegetation, depending on the hydrological, hydraulic, and geomorphological characteristic of the stream. In the past, the study of this complex theme was approached in two different ways. On the one hand, the subject was faced from a mainly qualitative point of view by ecologists and biogeographers. Riparian vegetation dynamics and its spatial patterns have been described and demonstrated in detail, and the key role of several fluvial processes has been shown, but no mathematical models have been proposed. On the other hand, the quantitative approach to fluvial processes, which is typical of engineers, has led to the development of several morphodynamic models. However, the biological aspect has usually been neglected, and vegetation has only been considered as a static element. In recent years, different scientific communities (ranging from ecologists to biogeographers and from geomorphologists to hydrologists and fluvial engineers) have begun to collaborate and have proposed both semiquantitative and quantitative models of river‐vegetation interconnections. These models demonstrate the importance of linking fluvial morphodynamics and riparian vegetation dynamics to understand the key processes that regulate a riparian environment in order to foresee the impact of anthropogenic actions and to carefully manage and rehabilitate riparian areas. In the first part of this work, we review the main interactions between rivers and riparian vegetation, and their possible modeling. In the second part, we discuss the semiquantitative and quantitative models which have been proposed to date, considering both multi‐ and single‐thread rivers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–221 of 221
New evidence of scroll‐bar formation on the Beatton River
Nanson, G. C. (1981) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.1981.tb01950.x · Cited by 53
Cadol, D., Rathburn, S. L., & Cooper, D. J. (2010) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.1399 · Cited by 51
Biomass selection by floods and related timescales. Part 2: Stochastic modeling
Crouzy, B., & Perona, P. (2011) · Advances in Water Resources · doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.09.018 · Cited by 48
Stream channels in peatlands: The role of biological processes in controlling channel form
Watters, J. R., & Stanley, E. H. (2006) · Geomorphology · doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.015 · Cited by 47
Pettit, N. E., Latterell, J. J., & Naiman, R. J. (2006) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.959 · Cited by 45
Rood, S. B., Goater, L. A., Gill, K. M., & Braatne, J. H. (2010) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-010-1758-2 · Cited by 45
Cooper, D. J., Dickens, J., Hobbs, N. T., Christensen, L., & Landrum, L. (2005) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.5965 · Cited by 44
Effect of density of riparian vegetation on effective tractive force
Ishikawa, Y., Sakamoto, T., & Mizuhara, K. (2003) · Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1007/s10310-003-0032-4 · Cited by 41
Riparian roots through time, space and disturbance
Kiley, D. K., & Schneider, R. L. (2005) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-004-0542-7 · Cited by 40
Landscape structure and diversity of fleshy-fruited species at forest edges
Kollmann, J., & Schneider, B. (1999) · Plant Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1009880506495 · Cited by 36
Smith, J. D. (2004) · Water Science and Application · doi:10.1029/008wsa06 · Cited by 33
Liffen, T., Gurnell, A. M., O’Hare, M. T., Pollen‐Bankhead, N., & Simon, A. L. (2011) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.015 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAsynchronous forest–stream coupling in a fire‐prone boreal landscape: insights from woody debris
Arseneault, D., Boucher, É., & Bouchon, É. (2007) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01251.x · Cited by 31
Ménard, A., Dubé, P., Bouchard, A., Canham, C. D., & Marceau, D. J. (2002) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(01)00503-8 · Cited by 30
Pollen‐Bankhead, N., Thomas, R. E., Gurnell, A. M., Liffen, T., Simon, A. L., & O’Hare, M. T. (2011) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.06.027 · Cited by 30
Self-citationThe Influence of trees on stream bank erosion: Evidence from root-plate abutments
Rutherfurd, I. D., & Grove, J. (2004) · Water science and application · doi:10.1029/008wsa11 · Cited by 28
BLACK WILLOW CUTTING SURVIVAL IN STREAMBANK PLANTINGS, SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES1
Pezeshki, S. R., & Shields, F. D. (2006) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb03833.x · Cited by 25
Modelling the effects of vegetation on flow and morphology in rivers.
Baptist, M. J., van den Bosch, L. V., Dijkstra, J. T., & Kapinga, S. (2003) · Large Rivers · doi:10.1127/lr/15/2003/339 · Cited by 20
Temple, D. M. (1987) · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1987)113:9(1224 · Cited by 16
Effect of Riparian Vegetation on Flow Resistance and Flood Potential
Darby, S. E. (1999) · Journal of Hydraulic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(1999)125:5(443
Cited by
Vargas‐Luna, A., Crosato, A., & Uijttewaal, W. S. J. (2015) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.3633 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., & Gurnell, A. M.
- Venue
- Reviews of Geophysics
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2013-07-25
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-414
- ISSN
- 0096-1043 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1209
- 1944-9208
- OpenAlex
- W1916467160
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 221
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
