Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Channel adjustments and alteration of sediment fluxes in gravel‐bed rivers of North‐Eastern Italy: potentials and limitations for channel recovery

Surian, Nicola, Ziliani, Luca, Comiti, Francesco, Lenzi, Mario A., Mao, Luca·2009·River Research and Applications

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explore possibilities and limitations of restoring physical processes in five gravel‐bed rivers (Brenta, Piave, Cellina, Tagliamento and Torre Rivers) in north‐eastern Italy. The selected rivers were analysed through a range of techniques, specifically analysis of historical maps and aerial photographs with geographical information systems (GIS), comparison of topographic surveys and geomorphological surveys. After illustrating channel adjustments and sediment fluxes, we discuss how the understanding of physical processes can be used for channel restoration. The studied river channels have undergone notable adjustments in the last 100 years, specifically narrowing by up to 76%, incision by up to 8.5 m, and changes in channel configuration. Alteration of sediment fluxes, mainly due to in‐channel mining, has been the main factor driving such channel adjustments. Evolutionary trends show that channel recovery is on‐going in several of the selected reaches, since widening and aggradation have occurred over the last 15–20 years. This channel recovery has been possible because sediment mining has significantly decreased or ceased along the study reaches. However, several constraints still exist on sediment fluxes (e.g. dams). Four categories of river channel were defined, taking into account the recent evolution of the studied channels (from ‘A’, high channel recovery, to ‘D’, no channel recovery). The impact of different sediment management strategies on channel dynamics over the next 40–50 years was then analysed. Without any intervention, channel recovery would only be possible in those reaches that have a relatively high degree of connectivity with upstream sediment sources or tributaries, while further incision and narrowing would be expected in those reaches where connectivity is low. A more substantial channel recovery could be obtained through interventions at reach (e.g. removal of bank protection) and basin (e.g. sediment transfer downstream of dams) scales. Notwithstanding such actions, it is likely that channels will not recover in the next few decades to the morphology they exhibited in the first half of the 20th century, when bed‐load yield and connectivity were higher. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rra.1231

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Surian, N., Ziliani, L., Comiti, F., Lenzi, M. A., & Mao, L.
Venue
River Research and Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-04
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
551-567
ISSN
  • 1535-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1467
OpenAlex
W2153839336
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Channel adjustments and alteration of sediment fluxes in gravel‐bed rivers of North‐Eastern Italy: potentials and limitations for channel recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rra.1231
The paper
Surian, N., Ziliani, L., Comiti, F., Lenzi, M. A., & Mao, L. (2009). Channel adjustments and alteration of sediment fluxes in gravel‐bed rivers of North‐Eastern Italy: potentials and limitations for channel recovery. River Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1231

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.