Cited by 168Reading and Literacy DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentEducational Games and Gamification

Assessing the Effectiveness of Two Theoretically Motivated Computer‐Assisted Reading Interventions in the United Kingdom: GG Rime and GG Phoneme

Kyle, Fiona, Kujala, Janne, Richardson, Ulla, Lyytinen, Heikki, Goswami, Usha·2013·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

We report an empirical comparison of the effectiveness of two theoretically motivated computer‐assisted reading interventions (CARI) based on the Finnish GraphoGame CARI: English GraphoGame Rime (GG Rime) and English GraphoGame Phoneme (GG Phoneme). Participants were 6–7‐year‐old students who had been identified by their teachers as being relatively poor at reading. The students were divided into three groups. Two of the groups played one of the games as a supplement to normal classroom literacy instruction for five sessions per week for a period of 12 weeks. The third group formed an untreated control. Both games led to gains in reading, spelling, and phonological skills in comparison with the untreated control group. The two interventions also had some differential effects. The intervention gains were maintained at a four‐month follow‐up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rrq.038

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For less transparent writing systems such as English and French, it is necessary to introduce and train mappings at various grain sizes including graphemes, syllables, rimes, whole words, and sentences.

    “it is necessary for the acquisition of less transparent writing systems (such as English and to a lesser extent French) to introduce and train these mappings at various grain sizes including graphemes, syllables, rimes, whole words and even sentences”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kyle, F., Kujala, J., Richardson, U., Lyytinen, H., & Goswami, U.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
61-76
ISSN
  • 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2722
OpenAlex
W2095721077
Cited by
168
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4
FWCI
26.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
Keywords
reading difficulties, early literacy, spelling, phonological skills, game-based learning, intervention effectiveness, children aged 6-7

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review