Cited by 189Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningReading and Literacy Development

The Effects of Extensive Reading on Reading Comprehension, Reading Rate, and Vocabulary Acquisition

Suk, Namhee·2017·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

Several empirical studies and syntheses of extensive reading have concluded that extensive reading has positive impacts on language learning in second‐ and foreign‐language settings. However, many of the studies contained methodological or curricular limitations, raising questions about the asserted positive effects of extensive reading. The present research adds to the limited set of well‐controlled studies by investigating the impact of an extensive reading approach over a 15‐week semester on the reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition of Korean university students studying English as a foreign language. A quasi‐experimental research design was employed using four intact classes: two control (n = 88) and two experimental (n = 83). The control classes received 100‐minute intensive reading instruction per week, whereas the experimental classes received equivalent 70‐minute intensive reading instruction and 30‐minute extensive reading instruction per week. A repeated‐measures multivariate analysis of variance revealed that the experimental classes significantly outperformed the control classes on the combination of the three dependent variables (i.e., reading comprehension, reading rate, vocabulary acquisition). Subsequent analyses of variance confirmed the positive impacts of extensive reading on all three areas. Instructional implications for extensive reading in second‐language curricula are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/rrq.152

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suk, N.
Affiliations
Pukyong National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Suk, Namhee
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-06-25
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
73-89
ISSN
  • 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2722
OpenAlex
W2472760694
Cited by
188
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
21.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reading Research Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
extensive reading, reading comprehension, reading speed, vocabulary acquisition, English as a foreign language, Korean university students, second language reading, foreign language curriculum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review