The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the river murray, Australia
Abstract
Regulation of lowland rivers often alienates large areas of the floodplain, altering the natural regime of flooding frequency, duration, and magnitude. The extent to which such changes alter the productivity of river‐floodplain ecosystems and the contribution of aquatic invertebrates emerging from dry floodplain sediments is unknown. To examine this in a section of the River Murray in South Australia, fourteen replicate sods of dry sediment collected from four areas of the floodplain that had experienced different average flood recurrence frequencies (annually, 1 in 7, 1 in 11, and 1 in 22 years) were inundated in the laboratory, simulating flooding. Invertebrates emerging from the dry sediments were sampled with replacement 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, and 28 days after inundation, enabling comparisons of temporal changes in faunal composition and biomass. The greatest biomass and numbers of invertebrates emerged from annually‐flooded sods whereas sediments usually flooded once in 22 years yielded only protozoans. Large numbers of cladocerans and rotifers were recorded within two days of inundation whereas ostracods were not numerous until two weeks later. Heterogeneity in faunal composition and biomass among replicates probably reflected patchiness in microtopography and resting stage settlement, and variable hatching ‘strategies’. Although experimental conditions rapidly diverged from the natural situation over time because of the unrealistic constraints of enclosure, results suggest a potentially significant contribution by emergent invertebrates to the newly‐inundated floodplain foodweb. Reducing floodplain inundation frequency through regulation and flood mitigation probably severely reduces this reserve, removing a food resource for young fish and other predators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kingsford, R. T. (2000) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2000.01036.x · Cited by 1,010
A perspective on dryland river ecosystems
Walker, K. F., Sheldon, F., & Puckridge, J. T. (1995) · Regulated Rivers: Research & Management · doi:10.1002/rrr.3450110108 · Cited by 423
Brock, M. A., Nielsen, D. L., Shiel, R. J., Green, J. D., & Langley, J. D. (2003) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01083.x · Cited by 364
Fish recruitment on floodplains: the roles of patterns of flooding and life history characteristics
King, A. J., Humphries, P., & Lake, P. S. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f03-057 · Cited by 351
Large-scale impacts of hydroelectric development
Rosenberg, D. M., Berkes, F., Bodaly, R. A., Hecky, R. E., Kelly, C. A., & Rudd, J. W. (1997) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a97-001 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Boulton, A. J., & Lloyd, L. N.
- Venue
- Regulated Rivers: Research & Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-151
- ISSN
- 0886-9375 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1646
- OpenAlex
- W2101298212
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the river murray, Australia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/rrr.3450070203
- The paper
- Boulton, A. J., & Lloyd, L. N. (1992). Flooding frequency and invertebrate emergence from dry floodplain sediments of the river murray, Australia. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450070203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.