A graph‐based approach to find teleconnections in climate data
Abstract
Pressure dipoles are important long distance climate phenomena (teleconnection) characterized by pressure anomalies of the opposite polarity appearing at two different locations at the same time. Such dipoles have been proven important for understanding and explaining the variability in climate in many regions of the world, e.g. the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) climate phenomenon, which is described by opposite pressure anomalies between the west and east Pacific and is known to be responsible for precipitation and temperature anomalies worldwide. This paper presents a graph‐based approach called shared reciprocal nearest neighbor approach that considers only reciprocal positive and negative edges in the shared nearest neighbor graph to find the dipoles. One crucial aspect of our approach to the analysis of such networks is a careful treatment of negative correlations, whose proper consideration is critical for finding the dipoles. Further, our work shows the importance of modeling the time‐dependent patterns of the dipoles in a changing climate in order to better capture the impact of important climate phenomena on the globe. To show the utility of finding dipoles using our approach, we show that the data driven dynamic climate indices generated from our algorithm generally perform better than static indices formed from the fixed locations used by climate scientists in terms of capturing impact on global temperature and precipitation. Our approach can generate a single snapshot picture of all the dipole interconnections on the globe in a given dataset and thus makes it possible to study the changes in dipole interactions and movements. As teleconnections are crucial in the understanding of the global climate system, there is a pressing need to better understand the behavior and interactions of these atmospheric processes as well as to capture them precisely. Our systematic graph‐based approach to find the teleconnections in climate data is an attempt in that direction. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining 6: 158–179, 2013
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The paradigm of TGDS has already begun to show promise in scientific problems from diverse disciplines.
“The paradigm of TGDS has already begun to show promise in scientific problems from diverse disciplines.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The architecture of the climate network
Tsonis, A. A., & Roebber, P. J. (2004) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2003.10.045 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2720168 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kawale, J., Liess, S., Kumar, A., Steinbach, M., Snyder, P., Kumar, V., Ganguly, A. R., Samatova, N. F., & Semazzi, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kawale, Jaya
- Venue
- Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 158-179
- ISSN
- 1932-1864 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-1872
- OpenAlex
- W2045272935
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- University of Minnesota
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- teleconnections, negative correlation, ENSO, atmospheric pressure anomalies, global temperature, precipitation, climate variability, time-dependent networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review