Cited by 1,752Model Reduction and Neural NetworksMachine Learning in Materials ScienceMachine Learning and Data Classification

Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data

Open access
Karpatne, Anuj, Atluri, Gowtham, Faghmous, James H., Steinbach, Michael, Banerjee, Arindam, Ganguly, Auroop, Shekhar, Shashi, Samatova, Nagiza +1 more·2017·IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering

Abstract

Data science models, although successful in a number of commercial domains, have had limited applicability in scientific problems involving complex physical phenomena. Theory-guided data science (TGDS) is an emerging paradigm that aims to leverage the wealth of scientific knowledge for improving the effectiveness of data science models in enabling scientific discovery. The overarching vision of TGDS is to introduce scientific consistency as an essential component for learning generalizable models. Further, by producing scientifically interpretable models, TGDS aims to advance our scientific understanding by discovering novel domain insights. Indeed, the paradigm of TGDS has started to gain prominence in a number of scientific disciplines such as turbulence modeling, material discovery, quantum chemistry, bio-medical science, bio-marker discovery, climate science, and hydrology. In this paper, we formally conceptualize the paradigm of TGDS and present a taxonomy of research themes in TGDS. We describe several approaches for integrating domain knowledge in different research themes using illustrative examples from different disciplines. We also highlight some of the promising avenues of novel research for realizing the full potential of theory-guided data science.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Theory-guided data science (TGDS) is proposed as a paradigm that integrates scientific knowledge with data science models to improve generalizability and scientific interpretability. The paper formalizes TGDS and presents a taxonomy of five research themes with illustrative examples from domains such as climate science, hydrology, materials discovery, quantum chemistry, and turbulence modeling.

Key findings

  • The paper conceptualizes TGDS as blending theory-based and data-driven models, with the revised performance objective: Performance ∝ Accuracy + Simplicity + Consistency.
  • It identifies five TGDS research themes: theory-guided design of data science models, theory-guided learning, theory-guided refinement of outputs, learning hybrid models of theory and data science, and augmenting theory-based models using data science.
  • Illustrative examples include Google Flu Trends overestimating flu propensity by more than a factor of two, discovery of a hundred new ternary oxide compounds, DFT methods with computational complexity O(N^3), and cardiac electrophysiological imaging with approximately 2000 heart-wall locations and approximately 100 torso electrodes.
  • The paper argues that physical consistency can reduce model variance by pruning physically inconsistent solutions without likely affecting bias.

Methods

  • This is a conceptual/vision paper, not an empirical study; it formally conceptualizes TGDS and presents a taxonomy of research themes.
  • It uses illustrative examples from diverse scientific disciplines, including turbulence modeling, material discovery, quantum chemistry, bio-medical science, bio-marker discovery, climate science, and hydrology.
  • The main analysis is qualitative synthesis and organization of approaches for integrating domain knowledge into data science models.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the TGDS research themes are not exhaustive and anticipates novel TGDS themes in the future.
  • It states that success will require significant innovations in handling the diversity of forms in which scientific knowledge is represented and ingested across disciplines, including differences in granularity, type, completeness, and uncertainty.
  • It states that most discussion focuses on supervised learning problems; evident from the text, the paper provides no empirical validation or quantitative evaluation of TGDS as a unified paradigm, relying instead on prior examples and conceptual argument.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tkde.2017.2720168

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 46 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingreasoning
    § Example 3 (Mapping Surface Water Dynamics). · p. 8

    In the illustrative two-dimensional training set, a linear classifier that disregards elevation information makes mistakes in the lower-left corner of the feature space.

    “If we disregard the elevation information and learn a linear classifier to simply minimize the training errors, we would learn the decision boundary shown using a dotted line in Figure 3a. This classifier would make some mistakes in the lower-left corner of the feature space, where the class confusion is difficult to resolve using a linear separator.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    The limited number of labeled instances available for training or cross-validation can often fail to represent the true nature of relationships in scientific problems.

    “For this reason, the limited number of labeled instances available for training or crossvalidation can often fail to represent the true nature of relationships in scientific problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Standard methods for assessing and ensuring generalizability of data science models may break down and lead to misleading conclusions in scientific problems.

    “Hence, standard methods for assessing and ensuring generalizability of data science models may break down and lead to misleading conclusions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisenone given
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Scientific problems are often under-constrained because they suffer from a paucity of representative training samples while involving a large number of physical variables.

    “First, scientific problems are often under-constrained in nature as they suffer from paucity of representative training samples while involving a large number of physical variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Premisenone given
    § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1

    Physical variables commonly show complex and non-stationary patterns that dynamically change over time.

    “Further, physical variables commonly show complex and non-stationary patterns that dynamically change over time.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 25
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Example 3 (Mapping Surface Water Dynamics). · p. 8

    In the illustrative example, using elevation information shows that the entire group of instances in the lower-left corner has higher elevation than the instances on the right labeled as land, and are thus less likely to be filled with water.

    “However, if we use the elevation information, we can see that the entire group of instances in the lower lower-left corner has a higher elevation than the instances shown on the right (labeled as land), and are thus less likely to be filled with water.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Example 4 (Post-processing using elevation constraints). · p. 10

    In an example lake in Africa, the post-processed classification map does not suffer from the errors of the initial classification map and visually matches well with the remote sensing image of the water body.

    “Figure 4 illustrates the effectiveness of this approach using an example lake in Africa, where the post-processed classification map does not suffer from the errors of the initial classification map and visually matches well with the remote sensing image of the water body.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Theory-guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data · p. 1

    Data science models have had limited applicability in scientific problems involving complex physical phenomena, and black-box application of data science has met with limited success in scientific domains.

    “Data science models, although successful in a number of commercial domains, have had limited applicability in scientific problems involving complex physical phenomena.”
    • Also stated in: § 1 INTRODUCTION · p. 1 · plain
      “Unfortunately, this notion of black-box application of data science has met with limited success in scientific domains (e.g., [14], [15], [16]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] [14] P. M. Caldwell, C. S. Bretherton, M. D. Zelinka, S. A. Klein, B. D. Santer, and B. M. Sanderson, 'Statistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data mining,' Geophysical Research Letters , vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1803-1808, 2014. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] [15] D. Lazer, R. Kennedy, G. King, and A. Vespignani, 'The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis,' Science (New York, N.Y.) , vol. 343, no. 6176, pp. 1203-5, Mar. 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24626916 - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] [16] G. Marcus and E. Davis, 'Eight (no, nine!) problems with big data,' The New York Times , vol. 6, no. 04, p. 2014, 2014. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 THEORY-GUIDED DATA SCIENCE · p. 2

    Theory-based models are well-suited for representing processes that are conceptually well understood using known scientific principles.

    “Theorybased models (see top-left corner of Figure 1) are wellsuited for representing processes that are conceptually well understood using known scientific principles.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 2 THEORY-GUIDED DATA SCIENCE · p. 2

    A number of scientific problems involve processes that are not completely understood by the current body of knowledge because of the inherent complexity of the processes.

    “For example, a number of scientific problems involve processes that are not completely understood by our current body of knowledge, because of the inherent complexity of the processes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § 2 THEORY-GUIDED DATA SCIENCE · p. 2

    Traditional data science models mainly rely on information contained in data and have wide applicability in domains where ample representative data samples exist.

    “On the other hand, traditional data science models mainly rely on the information contained in the data and thus reside in the bottom-right corner of Figure 1. They have a wide range of applicability in domains where we have ample supply of representative data samples, e.g., in Internet-scale problems such as text mining and object recognition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Example 1 (Hydrological Modeling). · p. 4

    Data science methods can help in augmenting theory-based models to make effective use of observational data.

    “Fifth, data science methods can also help in augmenting theory-based models to make effective use of observational data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Scientific theories used to guide data science models are sufficiently accurate and complete to provide useful constraints for improving model generalization.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Example 1 (Hydrological Modeling). · p. 4

    The outputs of data science models can be refined using explicit or implicit scientific knowledge.

    “Third, the outputs of data science models can be refined using explicit or implicit scientific knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Scientific theories used to guide data science models are sufficiently accurate and complete to provide useful constraints for improving model generalization.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Example 1 (Hydrological Modeling). · p. 3

    Most data science models can only capture associative relationships between variables and do not fully serve the goal of understanding causative relationships in scientific problems.

    “Further, since most data science models can only capture associative relationships between variables, they do not fully serve the goal of understanding causative relationships in scientific problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Example 1 (Hydrological Modeling). · p. 4

    Hybrid models can be constructed where some aspects of a problem are modeled using theory-based components while other aspects are modeled using data science components.

    “Fourth, another way of blending scientific knowledge and data science is to construct hybrid models, where some aspects of the problem are modeled using theory-based components while other aspects are modeled using data science components.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Scientific theories used to guide data science models are sufficiently accurate and complete to provide useful constraints for improving model generalization.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 4.3 Theory-guided Constrained Optimization · p. 6

    In scientific applications where theory-based constraints can be represented using linear equality or inequality conditions, they can be readily integrated in existing constrained optimization formulations, which provide computationally efficient solutions especially when the objective function is convex.

    “In scientific applications where theorybased constraints can be represented using linear equality or inequality conditions, they can be readily integrated in existing constrained optimization formulations, which are known to provide computationally efficient solutions especially when the objective function is convex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1 Theory-guided Initialization · p. 6

    Pretraining strategies for ANN initialization rely on plentiful amounts of unlabeled or labeled data and are not directly applicable in scientific domains where data sizes are small relative to the number of variables.

    “However, they rely on plentiful amounts of unlabeled or labeled data and hence are not directly applicable in scientific domains where the data sizes are small relative to the number of variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Pretraining strategies have made major impact on our ability to learn complex hierarchies of features in speech and image processing.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2 Theory-guided Probabilistic Models · p. 6

    Knowledge of convection-diffusion equations was used as priors for determining the connectivity structure of subsurface aquifers.

    “Another example of theory-guided priors can be found in the field of geophysics [51], where the knowledge of convection-diffusion equations was used as priors for determining the connectivity structure of subsurface aquifers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] [51] H. Denli, N. Subrahmanya et al. , 'Multi-scale graphical models for spatio-temporal processes,' in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2014, pp. 316-324. -

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Example 2 (Computational Chemistry). · p. 7

    A regression model that only focuses on minimizing training error leads to highly inconsistent solutions of the ground-state density and is not useful for quantum chemical calculations.

    “It was shown in [25] that a regression model that only focuses on minimizing the training error leads to highly inconsistent solutions of the ground-state density, and is thus not useful for quantum chemical calculations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] [25] L. Li, J. C. Snyder, I. M. Pelaschier, J. Huang, U.-N. Niranjan, P. Duncan, M. Rupp, K.-R. M¨ uller, and K. Burke, 'Understanding machine-learned density functionals,' International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , 2015. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Theory-guided Regularization · p. 9

    This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables obtained using domain knowledge.

    “This resulted in an MTL formulation where the task structure was inferred using contextual variables, obtained using domain knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] [67] A. Karpatne, A. Khandelwal, S. Boriah, and V. Kumar, 'Predictive learning in the presence of heterogeneity and limited training data.' in SDM . SIAM, 2014, pp. 253-261. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5 THEORY-GUIDED REFINEMENT OF DATA SCIENCE OUTPUTS · p. 9

    Domain knowledge can be used to refine the outputs of data science models so that they comply with current understanding of physical phenomena.

    “Domain knowledge can also be used to refine the outputs of data science models so that they are in compliance with our current understanding of physical phenomena.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 5.2 Using Implicit Domain Knowledge · p. 9

    In scientific applications, the domain structure among output variables may not always be known in the form of explicit equations that can be easily integrated in existing model refinement frameworks.

    “In scientific applications, the domain structure among the output variables may not always be known in the form of explicit equations that can be easily integrated in existing model refinement frameworks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4 Theory-guided Regularization · p. 9

    In recent work, the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in model parameters at related vegetation types.

    “In recent work [67], the presence of heterogeneity due to varying vegetation types was first inferred by clustering vegetation time series, which was then used to induce similarity in the model parameters at related vegetation types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [67] [67] A. Karpatne, A. Khandelwal, S. Boriah, and V. Kumar, 'Predictive learning in the presence of heterogeneity and limited training data.' in SDM . SIAM, 2014, pp. 253-261. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 6 LEARNING HYBRID MODELS OF THEORY AND DATA SCIENCE · p. 11

    Singh et al. used a machine learning component to directly augment a RANS approximation.

    “In another work by Singh et al. [20], a machine learning component was used to directly augment a RANS approximation in the following manner:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] [20] A. P. Singh, S. Medida, and K. Duraisamy, 'Machine learningaugmented predictive modeling of turbulent separated flows over airfoils,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03990 , 2016. -

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 6 LEARNING HYBRID MODELS OF THEORY AND DATA SCIENCE · p. 10

    Wang et al. explored the use of machine learning methods to assist RANS models and reduce their discrepancies.

    “recent work by Wang et al. [21] explored the use of machine learning methods to assist RANS models and reduce their discrepancies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] J.-X. Wang, J.-L. Wu, and H. Xiao, 'Physics-informed machine learning for predictive turbulence modeling: Using data to improve rans modeled reynolds stresses,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07987 , 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Current RANS models are still insufficient for modeling complex flows with separation, curvature, or swirling.
    • Rests on an assumption: Direct numerical simulations (DNS) at fine spatial grids are computationally too expensive to be feasible for studying practical turbulence problems in industry.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6 LEARNING HYBRID MODELS OF THEORY AND DATA SCIENCE · p. 11

    Wang et al.'s approach can be used with any generic RANS model to estimate its discrepancy, but it does not alter the form of approximation used in obtaining τ_RANS because Δτ_ML is learned independently of τ_RANS.

    “Although this approach can be used with any generic RANS model to estimate its discrepancy, it does not alter the form of approximation used in obtaining τ RANS , since ∆ τ ML is learned independently of τ RANS .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] J.-X. Wang, J.-L. Wu, and H. Xiao, 'Physics-informed machine learning for predictive turbulence modeling: Using data to improve rans modeled reynolds stresses,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07987 , 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 6 LEARNING HYBRID MODELS OF THEORY AND DATA SCIENCE · p. 10

    Depending on the nature of the model and the requirements of the application, there can be multiple ways of introducing data science outputs in theory-based models.

    “Depending on the nature of the model and the requirements of the application, there can be multiple ways of introducing data science outputs in theory-based models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § 7 AUGMENTING THEORY-BASED MODELS USING DATA SCIENCE · p. 11

    Data science methods can help in calibrating the parameters of theory-based models so that they provide a better realization of the physical system.

    “Data science methods can also help in calibrating the parameters of theorybased models so that they provide a better realization of the physical system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 6 LEARNING HYBRID MODELS OF THEORY AND DATA SCIENCE · p. 11

    In Wang et al.'s approach, the Reynolds stress is approximated as the sum of a RANS model term and a machine-learning-estimated discrepancy term, with the discrepancy estimated using a random forest.

    “where τ RANS is obtained from a RANS model while ∆ τ ML is the model discrepancy that is estimated using a random forest model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] [21] J.-X. Wang, J.-L. Wu, and H. Xiao, 'Physics-informed machine learning for predictive turbulence modeling: Using data to improve rans modeled reynolds stresses,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07987 , 2016. - source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: The exact form of the Reynolds stress is unknown.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Example 4 (Post-processing using elevation constraints). · p. 10

    The post-processed labels can help in obtaining a better estimate of the elevation ordering, resulting in an iterative solution that simultaneously infers the elevation ordering and produces physically consistent classification maps.

    “Further, the post-processed labels can help in obtaining a better estimate of the elevation ordering, thus resulting in an iterative solution that simultaneously infers the elevation ordering and produces physically consistent classification maps.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Calibrating Theory-based Models using Data · p. 11

    A number of computationally efficient approaches have been explored in different disciplines for parsimoniously calibrating model parameters with the help of observational data.

    “A number of computationally efficient approaches have been explored in different disciplines for parsimoniously calibrating model parameters with the help of observational data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] [75] K. Beven and A. Binley, 'The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction,' Hydrological processes , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 279-298, 1992.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Calibrating Theory-based Models using Data · p. 11

    The problem of parameter selection has recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community in the context of multi-armed bandit problems.

    “The problem of parameter selection has recently received considerable attention in the machine learning community in the context of multi-armed bandit problems [76], [77], [78].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [76] [76] O. Chapelle and L. Li, 'An empirical evaluation of thompson sampling,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2011, pp. 2249-2257.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [77] [77] L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and R. E. Schapire, 'A contextualbandit approach to personalized news article recommendation,' in Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web . ACM, 2010, pp. 661-670. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [78] [78] M. Jordan and T. Mitchell, 'Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects,' Science , vol. 349, no. 6245, pp. 255-260, 2015. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Calibrating Theory-based Models using Data · p. 11

    GLUE models the uncertainty associated with every parameter combination using Monte Carlo approaches and uses a Bayesian formulation to incrementally update the uncertainties as new observations are made available.

    “This approach models the uncertainty associated with every parameter combination using Monte Carlo approaches, and uses a Bayesian formulation to incrementally update the uncertainties as new observations are made available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] [75] K. Beven and A. Binley, 'The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction,' Hydrological processes , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 279-298, 1992.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 7.2 Calibrating Theory-based Models using Data · p. 11

    In GLUE, at any given iteration, the parameter combination that shows maximum agreement with the observations is employed in the model, and the results are used to update the uncertainties on the next iteration.

    “At any given iteration, the parameter combination that shows maximum agreement with the observations is employed in the model, the results of which are used to update the uncertainties on the next iteration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] [75] K. Beven and A. Binley, 'The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction,' Hydrological processes , vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 279-298, 1992.

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 8 CONCLUSION · p. 12

    The use of physical principles to constrain spatiotemporal pattern mining algorithms has been explored for finding ocean eddies from satellite data.

    “For example, the use of physical principles to constrain spatiotemporal pattern mining algorithms has been explored in [81], [82] for finding ocean eddies from satellite data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [81] [81] J. H. Faghmous, L. Styles, V. Mithal, S. Boriah, S. Liess, F. Vikebo, M. d. S. Mesquita, and V. Kumar, 'Eddyscan: A physically consistent ocean eddy monitoring application,' in Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU), 2012 Conference on , oct. 2012, pp. 96 -103. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [82] [82] J. H. Faghmous, H. Nguyen, M. Le, and V. Kumar, 'Spatiotemporal consistency as a means to identify unlabeled objects in a continuous data field,' in AAAI , 2014, pp. 410-416. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 8 CONCLUSION · p. 12

    Scientific knowledge can also be used to advance other aspects of data science, such as the design of scientific workflows or the generation of model simulations.

    “Scientific knowledge can also be used to advance other aspects of data science, e.g., the design of scientific work-flows [83], [84] or the generation of model simulations [85].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [83] [83] V. G. Honavar, 'The promise and potential of big data: A case for discovery informatics,' Review of Policy Research , vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 326-330, 2014. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [84] [84] Y. Gil, E. Deelman, M. Ellisman, T. Fahringer, G. Fox, D. Gannon, C. Goble, M. Livny, L. Moreau, and J. Myers, 'Examining the challenges of scientific workflows,' Ieee computer , vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 26-34, 2007. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [85] [85] M. Paganini, L. d. Oliveira, and B. Nachman, 'Calogan: Simulating 3d high energy particle showers in multi-layer electromagnetic calorimeters with generative adversarial networks,' arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.02355 , 2017. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § 8 CONCLUSION · p. 12

    Reducing the search space of the learning algorithm to physically consistent models may also have the additional benefit of reducing the computational cost of the algorithm.

    “Reducing the search space of the learning algorithm to physically consistent models may also have an additional benefit of reducing the computational cost of the algorithm.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
32 of 32
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Scientific theories used to guide data science models are sufficiently accurate and complete to provide useful constraints for improving model generalization.

    “By pruning candidate models that are inconsistent with known scientific principles (shown as shaded regions in Figure 2), we can significantly reduce the variance of models without likely affecting their bias.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The species mean provides a robust estimate of the average behavior across all organisms.

    “This relies on the basic principle that the species mean provides a robust estimate of the average behavior across all organisms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Artificial neural networks are susceptible to getting stuck at local minimas, saddle points, and flat regions in the loss curve.

    “One of the data science models that requires special efforts in choosing an appropriate combination of initial model parameters is the artificial neural network, which is known to be susceptible to getting stuck at local minimas, saddle points, and flat regions in the loss curve.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Water bodies have a concave elevation structure, so locations at lower elevation are filled up first before the water level reaches locations at higher elevations.

    “To address these challenges, there is an opportunity for improving the quality of classification maps by using the domain knowledge that water bodies have a concave elevation structure. Hence, locations at a lower elevation are filled up first before the water level reaches locations at higher elevations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Manually encoding domain knowledge in graphical models requires a great deal of expert supervision, which is cumbersome for problems involving a large number of variables with complex interactions.

    “However, manually encoding domain knowledge in graphical models requires a great deal of expert supervision, which can be cumbersome for problems involving a large number of variables with complex interactions-a common feature of scientific problems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many scientific problems involve constraints represented in complex forms, such as PDEs or non-linear transformations, which are not easily handled by traditional constrained optimization methods.

    “However, many scientific problems involve constraints that are represented in complex forms, e.g., using partial differential equations (PDE) or non-linear transformations of variables, which are not easily handled by traditional constrained optimization methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Obtaining the ground-state density n0(r) is challenging because the exact form of the interaction functional U[n] is unknown.

    “However, obtaining n 0 ( r ) is challenging because of the interaction functional, U [ n ] , whose exact form is unknown.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Kohn-Sham DFT methods have a computational complexity of O(N^3), which makes them challenging to apply on large systems.

    “Also, KS DFT methods have a computational complexity of O ( N 3 ) , which makes them challenging to apply on large systems.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most multi-task learning formulations require explicit knowledge of the composition of every task and the similarity structure among tasks, which is not always known in practical applications.

    “However, most MTL formulations require explicit knowledge of the composition of every task and the similarity structure among the tasks, which is not always known in practical applications.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Elevation information is seldom available at the desired granularity for most water bodies around the world.

    “However, such information is seldom available at the desired granularity for most water bodies around the world.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The space of all possible materials is extremely large, making it impractical to perform computationally expensive ab initio calculations on every material.

    “However, since the space of all possible materials is extremely large, it is impractical to perform computationally expensive ab initio calculations on every material to estimate their structure and properties.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Regularization techniques such as Lp norm minimization are agnostic to the physical feasibility of the learned model.

    “However, these techniques are agnostic to the physical feasibility of the learned model and thus can lead to physically inconsistent solutions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pretraining strategies have made major impact on our ability to learn complex hierarchies of features in speech and image processing.

    “These pretraining strategies have made major impact on our ability to learn complex hierarchies of features in several application domains such as speech and image processing.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the presence of heterogeneity in data sub-populations, different groups of instances show different relationships between inputs and outputs.

    “In the presence of heterogeneity in data sub-populations, different groups of instances in the data show different relationships between the inputs and outputs.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Current RANS models are still insufficient for modeling complex flows with separation, curvature, or swirling.

    “Despite the continued efforts in approximating τ , current RANS models are still insufficient for modeling complex flows with separation, curvature, or swirling.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.

    “Theory-based models often involve a large number of parameters in their equations that need to be calibrated in order to provide an accurate representation of the physical system.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The exact form of the Reynolds stress is unknown.

    “Since the exact form of the Reynolds stress is unknown, different approximations of τ have been explored in previous studies, resulting in a variety of RANS models.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Direct numerical simulations (DNS) at fine spatial grids are computationally too expensive to be feasible for studying practical turbulence problems in industry.

    “The high computational costs of DNS make it infeasible for studying practical turbulence problems in the industry, which are typically solved using inexact but computationally cheap approximations.”
18 of 18

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rationale behind Theory-guided Data Science is the need for databased models to generate knowledge that is the prior knowledge brought by the field in which it operates.

    “The rationale behind this rising paradigm is the need for databased models to generate knowledge that is the prior knowledge brought by the field in which it operates.”
  • Hybrid models leveraging both deep learning and bio-physical models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.

    “such hybrid models tend to be less data-intensive, avoid incoherent predictions, and are generally more interpretable than purely data-driven models.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

  • The hybrid models paradigm is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of visual cues.

    “This “hybrid models” paradigm48,50 is one of the most exciting avenues in modern ML and promises real collaboration between domains of application and ML, especially when coupled with algorithmic designs that allow interpretation and understanding of the visual cues that are being used136.”

    From Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Ground-state density is called ground-state energy

    Minor

    The paper defines n 0 ( r ) as the ground-state density and E [ n 0 ] as its energy, but later calls n 0 ( r ) the ground-state energy.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 2016, Physics Informed Machine Learning Conference
  2. graham-rowe, 2008, Big data: Science in the petabyte era, Nature, 455, 8
  3. jonathan, 2011, Special issue: Dealing with data, Science, 331, 639
  4. marcus, 2014, Eight (no, nine!) problems with big data, New York Times, 6
  5. melville, 2011, Recommender systems, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, 829

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karpatne, A., Atluri, G., Faghmous, J. H., Steinbach, M., Banerjee, A., Ganguly, A., Shekhar, S., Samatova, N., & Kumar, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering
Published
2017-10-01
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2318-2331
ISSN
1041-4347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734256217
Cited by
1,752
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 436 · 2025: 233 · 2024: 230 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 206 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 7
FWCI
30.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
US National Science Foundation (#1029711)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
scientific discovery, domain knowledge integration, interpretable models, turbulence modeling, materials discovery, quantum chemistry, biomarker discovery, climate science, hydrology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review