Cited by 409Network Traffic and Congestion ControlWireless Networks and ProtocolsOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks

TCP Hybla: a TCP enhancement for heterogeneous networks

Caini, Carlo, Firrincieli, Rosario·2004·International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking

Abstract

In heterogeneous networks, TCP connections that incorporate a terrestrial or satellite radio link are greatly disadvantaged with respect to entirely wired connections, because of their longer round trip times (RTTs). To cope with this problem, a new TCP proposal, the TCP Hybla, is presented and discussed in the paper. It stems from an analytical evaluation of the congestion window dynamics in the TCP standard versions (Tahoe, Reno, NewReno), which suggests the necessary modifications to remove the performance dependence on RTT. TCP Hybla performance is firstly evaluated in the case of an ideal channel, with good correlation between analytical and simulation data. Then, more realistic situations, which require the adoption of a benchmark network topology and a careful ns‐2 simulation set‐up, are examined. In particular, TCP Hybla performance is compared with that achievable by TCP standard in the presence of congestion and link losses, either separately or jointly considered. In all the examined cases, the superiority of TCP Hybla is evident, as it greatly reduces the severe penalization suffered by wireless, and especially satellite, TCP connections. Finally, it is worth noting that TCP Hybla does not infringe the end to end semantics of TCP and is compatible with other promising enhancements. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sat.799

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results demonstrate that PCC outperforms standard TCP and other variants specially designed for particular networks, such as TCP-Hybla for satellite networks and TCP-SABUL for inter-data center networks.

    “The results demonstrate that PCC outperforms standard TCP and other variants specially designed for particular networks, such as TCP-Hybla [83] for satellite networks and TCP-SABUL [172] for inter-data center networks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caini, C., & Firrincieli, R.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Caini, Carlo
Venue
International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-31
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
547-566
ISSN
  • 1542-0973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-0981
OpenAlex
W2151594619
Cited by
409
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
14.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Keywords
TCP congestion control, heterogeneous networks, satellite links, wireless TCP, round-trip time, TCP Reno, TCP Tahoe, TCP NewReno, link loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review