The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge
Open accessAbstract
This study investigated the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) within a group of 12 preservice chemistry teachers (all M.Sc.) during the first semester of their one‐year post‐graduate teacher education program. The study focused on PCK with respect to a central issue in science teaching, that is, the relation between observable phenomena, like chemical reactions, and macroscopic properties (e.g., boiling point, solubility) on the one hand, and their interpretation in terms of corpuscular characteristics on the other hand (macro–micro). For secondary school students, shifting mentally between the macro and micro levels is usually problematic, whereas their teachers are often unaware of students' learning difficulties in this domain. The collection of data involved two written questionnaires, interviews with each preservice teacher and their respective mentors, and an audio recording of a specific workshop session in the teacher education program. Results indicated a growing awareness among the preservice teachers concerning the need, in teaching situations, to explicitly relate the macro and micro levels to each other. Moreover, the importance of the careful and consistent use of language was noticed by many preservice teachers. The growth of PCK was influenced mostly by the preservice teachers' teaching experiences. Also, the workshop contributed substantially. Finally, for some preservice teachers, their mentors had influenced the growth of PCK. Implications for science teacher education are discussed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 86:572–590, 2002; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543062002129 · Cited by 1,960
Cited by
The Development of Prospective Secondary Biology Teachers PCK
Brown, P., Friedrichsen, P., & Abell, S. (2013) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9312-1 · Cited by 95
Azam, S. (2020) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/8941 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Driel, J. H., Jong, O. D., & Verloop, N.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-18
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 572-590
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W1991545639
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sce.10010
- The paper
- Van Driel, J. H., Jong, O. D., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of preservice chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.