Cited by 1,960Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsReflective Practices in Education

Professional Growth Among Preservice and Beginning Teachers

Kagan, Dona M.·1992·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

I began this review with three objectives: (a) to determine whether recent learning-to-teach studies form a coherent body of literature, (b) to use any common themes that emerged from these studies to construct a model of professional growth for novice and beginning teachers, and (c) to draw inferences from the model concerning the nature of preservice teacher education programs likely to promote growth by capitalizing on naturally occurring processes and stages. I review 40 learning-to-teach studies published or presented between 1987 and 1991: 27 deal with preservice teachers, 13 with first-year or beginning teachers. All were naturalistic and qualitative in methodology. Studies within each of those divisions are clustered and summarized according to major themes that emerged from findings. The model I ultimately infer from the 40 studies confirms, explicates, and integrates Fuller’s (Fuller & Bown, 1975) developmental model of teacher concerns and Berliner’s (1988) model of teacher development based on cognitive studies of expertise. Preservice and first-year teaching appears to constitute a single developmental stage during which novices accomplish three primary tasks: (a) acquire knowledge of pupils; (b) use that knowledge to modify and reconstruct their personal images of self as teacher; and (c) develop standard procedural routines that integrate classroom management and instruction. In general, preservice programs fail to address these tasks adequately.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543062002129

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Past histories are powerful in determining teachers' identities as teachers.

    “Research has shown that these past histories are powerful in determining teachers' identities as teachers.Kagan's (1992) review of the literature highlights representative studies whose results document the significant impact of”

    From Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation (2007) · cites this paper as Kagan's (1992)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kagan, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Kagan, Dona M.
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
1992-06
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
129-169
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2111008343
Cited by
1,960
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 96
FWCI
194.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
Keywords
teacher professional development, initial teacher education, novice teachers, learning to teach, teacher concerns, cognitive expertise, teacher self-concept, classroom management, Fuller, Berliners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review