The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners
Open accessAbstract
The construction and reconstruction of meanings by learners requires that they actively seek to integrate new knowledge with knowledge already in their cognitive structure. Ausubel's assimilation theory of cognitive learning has been shown to be effective in guiding research and instructional design to facilitate meaningful learning (Ausubel, The psychology of meaningful verbal learning, New York: Grune and Stratton, 1963; Educational psychology: A cognitive view, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968; The acquisition and retention of knowledge, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000). Gowin's Vee heuristic has been employed effectively to aid teachers and students in understanding the constructed nature of knowledge (Gowin, Educating, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981). “Situated learning” occurs when learning is by rote or at a lower level of meaningful learning. Concept mapping has been used effectively to aid meaningful learning with resulting modification of student's knowledge structures. When these knowledge structures are limited or faulty in some way, they may be referred to as Limited or Inappropriate Propositional Hierarchies (LIPH's). Conceptual change, or more accurately conceptual reconstrution, requires meaningful learning to modify LIPH's. Collaborative group learning facilitates meaningful learning and new knowledge construction. World‐wide economic changes are forcing major changes in business and industry placing a premium on the power and value of knowledge and new knowledge production. These changes require changes in school and university education that centers on the nature and power of meaningful learning. New computer tools are available to facilitate teaching activities targeted at modifying LIPH's, and aiding meaningful learning in general. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 86:548–571, 2002; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10032
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“” Chi (1994) has developed another model to explain problems in acquisition of valid concepts that emphasizes that a specific class of constructs, namely those that are invented by scientists and involve dynamic interactions of several underlying components.”
Background(1999) · Cited by 12,812
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Hall, M. B., & Kuhn, T. S. (1963) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1847040 · Cited by 7,755
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,203
Self-citationNovak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Kahle, J. B. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173469 · Cited by 5,199
Self-citationAccommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Conceptual Change in Childhood
Carey, S. E. (1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,851
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Bartow S. T.(1981).Misconceptions in science concept learning. Unpublished MS Thesis Cornell University Ithaca NY.
- Chi M. T. H.(1994).Barriers to conceptual change in learning science concepts: A theoretical conjecture. Proceedings of the fifteenth annual cognitive science society conference Boulder CO.
- Edmondson K., 1992, The history and philosophy of science in science education, 253
- Feldsine J. E.Jr.(1987).Distinguishing student's misconceptions from alternative conceptual frameworks through construction of concept maps. In J. D. Novak (Ed.) Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Ithaca NY: Dept. of Education Cornell University.
- Feldsine J. N.(1983).Concept mapping: A method for detection of possible student misconceptions. In H. Helm & J. D. Novak Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Ithaca NY Department of Education Cornell University.
- Flavel J. H., 1973, In the nature of intelligence
- Fuata'i K. A.(1985).Use of vee maps and concept maps in learning form five mathematics. Unpublished M.S. Thesis Cornell University.
- Fuata'i K. A., 1998, Learning to solve mathematics problems through concept mapping and Vee mapping
- Gonzales F. M., 1993, Serie: Educacion y Futuro no. 18
- Gowin D. B., 1981, Educating
- Hassard J., 1992, Minds on science
- Helm H. & Novak J. D. (Eds.) (1983).Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. Department of Education Cornell University Ithaca NY.
- Macnamara J. T., 1982, Names for things: A study of human learning
- Novak J. D.(1983).Overview of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics. In H. Helm & J. D. Novak (Eds.) Proceedings of the international seminar on misconceptions in science and mathematics (pp.1–4).
- Novak J. D., 1994, A view on the current status of Ausubel's assimilation theory of learning, CADMO: Giornale Italiano di Pedagogia, Sperimentale, Didattica, Docimologia, Tecnologia dell'instruzione, 2, 7
- Novak J. D. &Iuli R. I.(1995).Meaningful learning as the foundation for constructivist epistemology. In F. Finley D. Allchin D. Rhees & S. Fifield (Eds.) Proceedings of the third international history philosophy and science teaching conference (Vol. 2 pp.873–896). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
- Novak J. D., 1990, Special issue: Concept mapping, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 921
- 1989, The Private Universe Project
- Sadler P. M., 2000, Assessing science understanding, 249
- Toulmin S., 1972, Human understanding
- von Glasersfeld E., 1984, The invented reality, 17
- 10.1037/11193-000 · DOI
- Waterman M. A., 1982, Use of scientific research reports to develop higher‐level cognitive skills, Journal of College Science Teaching, 11, 336
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Where's the evidence that active learning works?
MICHAEL, J. A. (2006) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006 · Cited by 1,719
A teoria subjacente aos mapas conceituais e como elabora-los e usa-los
Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2010) · Praxis Educativa · doi:10.5212/praxeduc.v.5i1.009029 · Cited by 1,681
Self-citationSchraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529
Putting Education in “Educational” Apps
Hirsh‐Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015) · Gothic.net · doi:10.1177/1529100615569721 · Cited by 1,305
The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them
Novak, J. D. (2004) · Cited by 994
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Novak, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Novak, Joseph D.
- ORCID
- Novak, Joseph D.
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-18
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 548-571
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2135814321
- Cited by
- 914
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 21.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- meaningful learning, conceptual change, conceptual reconstruction, situated learning, concept mapping, knowledge construction, student empowerment, computer-assisted instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review