Cited by 1,529Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning

Schraw, Gregory, Crippen, Kent J., Hartley, Kendall·2006·Research in Science Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Venue
Research in Science Education
Published
2006-03
Volume
36
Issue
1-2
Pages
111-139
ISSN
  • 0157-244X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1898
OpenAlex
W2038252642
Cited by
1,529
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 76 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 100 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 59
FWCI
19.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
student self-regulation, metacognition, science education, motivation, teaching methods, inquiry-based learning, cooperative learning, problem-solving instruction, mental models, educational technology, self-efficacy, epistemological beliefs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review