The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century
Abstract
The laboratory has been given a central and distinctive role in science education, and science educators have suggested that rich benefits in learning accrue from using laboratory activities. Twenty years have been elapsed since we published a frequently cited, critical review of the research on the school science laboratory (Hofstein & Lunetta, Rev. Educ. Res. 52 (2), 201–217, 1982). Twenty years later, we are living in an era of dramatic new technology resources and new standards in science education in which learning by inquiry has been given renewed central status. Methodologies for research and assessment that have developed in the last 20 years can help researchers seeking to understand how science laboratory resources are used, how students' work in the laboratory is assessed, and how science laboratory activities can be used by teachers to enhance intended learning outcomes. In that context, we take another look at the school laboratory in the light of contemporary practices and scholarship. This analysis examines scholarship that has emerged in the past 20 years in the context of earlier scholarship, contemporary goals for science learning, current models of how students construct knowledge, and information about how teachers and students engage in science laboratory activities. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 88: 28–54, 2004; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/.sce10106
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smaller, more informal teaching groups can promote cooperative learning and allow meaningful student inquiry.
“smaller, more informal teaching groups can promote cooperative learning and allow meaningful student inquiry [3]”
Face-to-face tutorials are effective in equipping students with sufficient basic knowledge.
“This is effective in equipping the students with the sufficient amount of basic knowledge”
The guidance students receive to instruct their lab activities is essential to their learning.
“The guidance that students receive to instruct their lab activities is recognized as being essential to their learning [3].”
Cites
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges with graph interpretation: a review of the literature
Glazer, N. (2011) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.605307 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M. W., & Gadegaard, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155895 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Establishing the Laboratory as the Place to Learn How to Do Chemistry
Seery, M. K. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00764 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Kelley, E. W. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00457 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Enneking, K. M., Breitenstein, G. R., Coleman, A. F., Reeves, J. H., Wang, Y., & Grove, N. P. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00637 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Bumbacher, E., Salehi, S., Wieman, C., & Blikstein, P. (2018) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-017-9719-8 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Exploring Science and Technology Teachers’ Experiences with Integrating Simulation-Based Learning
Singh-Pillay, A. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14080803 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Does Virtual Titration Experiment Meet Students’ Expectation? Inside Out from Indian Context
Jennifer G., A., George Thomas, M., & Vijay Solomon, R. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01034 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Science teachers’ data use practices: A descriptive analysis
Snodgrass Rangel, V., Monroy, C., & Bell, E. (2016) · Education Policy Analysis Archives · doi:10.14507/epaa.24.2348 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Drumm, B. T., Bree, R., Griffin, C. S., & O’Leary, N. (2024) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00257.2023 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
On-the-Go Lab for Aqueous Reactions Demonstrations: Activities at the Microscale
Davila-Diaz, K. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01317 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N.
- Affiliations
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lunetta, Vincent N.
- ORCID
- Hofstein, Avi
- Venue
- Science Education
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-03
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-54
- ISSN
- 0036-8326 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-237X
- OpenAlex
- W2162357379
- Cited by
- 2,699
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 224 · 2025: 171 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 163 · 2018: 172 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 116
- FWCI
- 65.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Experimental Learning in Engineering
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Outcomes
- Keywords
- school science laboratories, laboratory exercises, inquiry-based learning, science education standards, student assessment, knowledge construction, teacher practices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review